Skip to main content
Log in

Residual effect of CO2 on hake (Merluccius merluccius L.) stored in modified and controlled atmospheres

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

 The residual effect of CO2 on whole gutted hake kept with three different CO2/O2/N2 gas mixtures: 60/15/25, 80/20/0 and 40/40/20, and two different kinds of atmospheres (controlled and modified) during 12 days followed by conventional storage in ice for up to 30 days was examined by physical, chemical and sensory analyses. Shelf life was longer in lots kept in atmospheres than in control lots and was further prolonged by controlled than by modified atmospheres. The lots kept in the atmosphere with the highest concentrations (80%) of CO2 exhibited the lowest trimethylamine nitrogen and total volatile basic nitrogen values. However, these were also the lots that scored worst in sensory analysis. The lots that scored best in sensory analysis were those which were kept in the gas mixtures with 60% and 40% of CO2. Oxidative rancidity was not a problem in the samples stored in the atmosphere with 40% O2; Thiobarbituric acid levels were lower than 2 mg/100 g in all lots throughout storage, and the assessors detected no rancidity. The residual effect of CO2 on whole gutted hake was more effective in controlled atmosphere lots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 15 June 2000 / Revised version: 17 August 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruiz-Capillas, C., Moral, A. Residual effect of CO2 on hake (Merluccius merluccius L.) stored in modified and controlled atmospheres. Eur Food Res Technol 212, 413–420 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002170000270

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002170000270

Navigation