Skip to main content
Log in

Collaborative trial validation of a construct-specific real-time PCR method for detection of genetically modified linseed event ‘CDC Triffid’ FP967

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A real-time PCR-based method for construct-specific detection of the genetically modified (GM) linseed event ’CDC Triffid’ FP967 originating from Canada has been validated in a collaborative trial. The construct-specific method amplifies a 105 bp long fragment of the transgenic insertion present in FP967 spanning the junction of the terminator region of the nopalin synthase gene from Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Tnos) to a sequence region coding for the dehydrofolate reductase gene (dfr) from a class I integron from Escherichia coli. This region is characteristic for the construct used to develop FP967. A total of 11 laboratories participated in the collaborative study. For PCR analysis, each laboratory received 14 DNA samples comprising 7 double-blind DNA samples. The samples consisted of two low GM-levels of FP967 DNA (10 or 50 copies per PCR), of DNA from two different GM-positive linseed products and of DNA from GM-negative linseed, potato and rapeseed materials, respectively. All but one of the FP967-positive DNA samples were detected correctly. No false-positive results were reported. The results demonstrate that the linseed event FP967 is detectable even at low copy number concentrations. The limit of detection (LOD) determined with plasmid DNA was shown to be at 5 copies of the Tnos–dfr sequence. The data provided show that the method can be applied successfully in different laboratories and is fit-for-purpose to test for the presence of the EU-unauthorised linseed event ‘CDC Triffid’ FP967.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. McHughen A (1989) Agrobacterium mediated transfer of chlorsulfuron resistance to commercial flax cultivars. Plant Cell Rep 8:445–449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Petition for Determination of Nonregulated Status for CDC Triffid Flax. US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/98_33501p.pdf

  3. RASFF Portal Notification List. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/rasff-window/portal/index.cfm?event=notificationsList

  4. Sampling and Testing Protocol for the Canadian Flaxseed Exported to the European Union. Canadian Grain Commission, March 10 2010. http://www.grainscanada.gc.ca/gmflax-lingm/stpf-peevl-eng.pdf

  5. Commission Recommendation of 4 October 2004 on technical guidance for sampling and detection of genetically modified organisms and material produced from genetically modified organisms as or in products in the context of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 (787/2004/EC). OJ L 348/18: 18–26

  6. Website of the European Union Reference Laboratory for GM Food & Feed. Detection of flax CDC Triffid (FP967). http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/flax.htm

  7. NOST-Spec construct-specific method for the detection of CDC Triffid Flax (Event FP967) using real-time PCR. http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/doc/Flax-CDCTriffidFlaxJRC091030.pdf

  8. Delobel C, Querci M, Ermolli M, Mazzara M, Cordeil S, Van den Eede G (2009) Report on the verification of the performance of a construct-specific assay for the detection of flax CDC Triffid Event FP967 using real-time PCR. http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/flax.htm

  9. ISO 21571:2005: Foodstuffs—methods of analysis for the detection of genetically modified organisms and derived products—nucleic acid extraction; Annex A.3.1

  10. Arumuganathan K, Earle ED (1991) Nuclear content of some important plant species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 9:208–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Event-specific Method for the Quantification of Amylopectin Potato Event EH92-527-1 Using Real-time PCR. http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/summaries/EH92-527-Validated_method.pdf

  12. Event-specific Method for the Quantification of Oilseed Rape Line RT73 Using Real-time PCR. http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/summaries/RT73_validated_Method.pdf

  13. ISO 5725-2 Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results—part 2: basic method for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method

  14. Horwitz W (1995) Protocol for the design, conduct and interpretation of method performance studies. Pure Appl Chem 67:331–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Proposed Draft Guidelines on Performance Criteria and Validation of Methods for Detection, Identification and Quantification of Specific DNA Sequences and Specific Proteins in Food. Report of the 31st Session of the Codex Committee on Methods of Analysis and Sampling (Alinorm 10/33/23), Appendix III. http://www.codexalimentarius.net/download/report/738/al33_23e.pdf

  16. Holst-Jensen A, Berdal KG (2004) The modular analytical procedure and validation approach and the units of measurement for genetically modified materials in foods and feeds. J AOAC Int 87:927–936

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Definition of minimum performance requirements for analytical methods of GMO testing. European Network of GMO Laboratories (ENGL) 13 October 2008. http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/doc/Min_Perf_Requirements_Analytical_methods.pdf

  18. Fast ID Genomic DNA Extraction Kit—instruction manual. http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/doc/Genomic-DNA-Extraction-Kit-8-3.pdf

  19. Sampling and analysis guidelines for the detection of genetically modified flax. http://www.bvl.bund.de/cln_027/nn_1150464/DE/06__Gentechnik/00__doks__downloads/08__nachweis__kontrollen/gm__flax__guidelines,templateId=raw,property=publicationFile.pdf/gm_flax_guidelines.pdf

  20. Sampling and testing protocol for bulk shipments of Canadian flaxseed exported to Japan for feed or industrial use. Canadian Grain Commission, 26 January 2010. http://www.grainscanada.gc.ca/gmflax-lingm/japan-japon/stpfj-peevlj-eng.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to Helmut Würdemann and Beate Mühlbauer for their excellent technical assistance during this study. We would like to thank Joachim Bendiek (BVL) for carefully reading the manuscript and for helpful comments. The authors are also grateful to all participants of the collaborative trial: Sabine Burkhardt, Landeslabor Berlin Brandenburg (Berlin, Germany), Sabine Domey, Thüringer Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft (Jena, Germany), Anette Hilpert, Thüringer Landesamt für Lebensmittel und Verbraucherschutz (Jena, Germany), Rupert Hochegger, Österreichische Agentur für Gesundheit und Ernährungssicherheit (Wien, Austria), René Köppel, Kantonales Labor (Zürich, Switzerland), Dietrich Mäde, Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz Sachsen Anhalt (Halle, Germany), Gabi Mücher, GEN-IAL GmbH (Troisdorf, Germany), Gabriele Näumann, Institut für Hygiene und Umwelt (Hamburg, Germany), Ralf Reiting, Landesbetrieb Hessisches Landeslabor (Kassel, Germany), Brigitte Speck Landwirtschaftliches Technologiezentrum (Augustenberg, Germany), Jutta Zagon, Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (Berlin, Germany).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lutz Grohmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grohmann, L., Busch, U., Pecoraro, S. et al. Collaborative trial validation of a construct-specific real-time PCR method for detection of genetically modified linseed event ‘CDC Triffid’ FP967. Eur Food Res Technol 232, 557–561 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-010-1403-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-010-1403-7

Keywords

Navigation