Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting the cookie quality of flours by using Mixolab®

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the possibility of using Mixolab® to predict the cookie baking quality of different wheat flours. Mixolab data was also compared with various flour quality characteristics. There were significant correlations (P < 0.001) between Mixolab stability and some of the flour quality characteristics (protein and wet gluten contents, Zeleny sedimentation value). Alveoconsistograph T value was negatively correlated with Mixolab C3, C4 and C5 values. The cookie diameter gave highly significant correlations with protein content, Zeleny sedimentation value and damaged starch content. Mixolab C3 and C4 values were highly correlated (P < 0.001) with both cookie diameter and spread ratio. A significant correlation coefficient (r = 0.556) was determined between the cookie diameter and C1–C2 value which is an indication of protein quality. The dependence of cookie diameter and spread ratio on Mixolab C3 value, damaged starch content and Zeleny sedimentation value were analyzed with multiple regression analysis and high multiple correlation coefficients were found between these parameters (r = 0.948 and 0.861, respectively).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bloksma AH, Bushuk W (1988) Rheology and chemistry of doughs. In: Pomeranz Y (ed) Wheat: chemistry and technology, 3rd edn, vol II. AACC, St Paul, pp 131–218

  2. Sliwinski EL, Kolster P, van Vliet T (2004) J Cereal Sci 39:231–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anonymous (2005) Mixolab® user’s manual. Tripette & Renaud Chopin, France

  4. Manthey F, Tulbek MC, Sorenson B (2006) AACC annual meeting: World Grain Summit: foods and beverages, 17–20 Sep 2006, San Francisco, CA, p 336

  5. Kahraman K, Sakiyan O, Ozturk S, Koksel H, Sumnu G, Dubat A (2008) European food research and technology. doi:10.1007/s00217-007-0757-y

  6. Rosell CM, Collar C, Haros M (2007) Food Hydrocolloid 21:452–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tulbek MC, Hall C (2006) AACC annual meeting: World Grain Summit: foods and beverages, 17–20 Sep 2006, San Francisco, CA, p 140

  8. Bonet A, Blaszczak W, Rosell CM (2006) Cereal Chem 83:655–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. AACC (2000) Approved methods of the AACC. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, MN

  10. Hoseney RC (1994) Principles of cereal science and technology. American Association of Cereal Chemists Inc, St Paul, MN

    Google Scholar 

  11. Finney KF, Yamazaki WT (1967) Quality of hard, soft and durum wheats. In: Quinsberry KS, Reitz LP (eds) Wheat and wheat improvement. American Society of Agronomy Inc., Madison, WI, pp 471–503

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Chopin Technologies for lending us the Mixolab® instrument.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamit Koksel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ozturk, S., Kahraman, K., Tiftik, B. et al. Predicting the cookie quality of flours by using Mixolab® . Eur Food Res Technol 227, 1549–1554 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-008-0879-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-008-0879-x

Keywords

Navigation