Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in sugar, organic acid, flavonol and carotenoid composition during ripening of berries of three seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) cultivars

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soluble solid, sugar, organic acid, flavonol and carotenoid content were determined in seabuckthorn berries of the three German cultivars Askola, Hergo and Leikora, collected at different harvesting times, to provide a more thorough knowledge of quality changes occurring during ripening of the berries. The main organic acids were malic (1940–4660 mg/100 g), quinic (810–2820 mg/100 g), ascorbic (180–370 mg/100 g) and citric acid (90–160 mg/100 g). In all three cultivars a marked decline in total organic acid concentration was observed during ripening. The pattern of variation of sugars, glucose (0.26–2.10 g/100 g) and fructose (0.14–0.54 g/100 g), was somewhat different among the three cultivars. In all three cultivars ascorbic acid concentration decreased during ripening. The main flavonols were isorhamnetin (350–660 mg/kg), quercetin (30–100 mg/kg) and kaempferol (2–5 mg/kg). The trends of flavonol content during ripening were quite different among the three cultivars. The main carotenoids were zeaxanthin (30–150 mg/kg), β-carotene (3–50 mg/kg) and β-criptoxanthin (5–19 mg/kg). The genotype seemed to affect both the extent of carotenoid accumulation and the carotenoid profile but in all three cultivars ripening was accompanied by an increase in total carotenoid concentration. The various classes of antioxidants showed quite different patterns of variation during ripening, achieving their maximum level at different harvesting dates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li TSC, Schroeder WR (1996) Hort Tech 6:370–380

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yang B, Kallio H (2002) Trends Food Sci Technol 13:160–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beveridge T, Li TSC, Oomah DB, Smith A (1999) J Agric Food Chem 47:3480–3488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tang X, Tigerstedt PMA (2001) Scientia Hort 88:203–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gao X, Ohlander M, Jeppsson N, Björk L, Trajkovski V (2000) J Agric Food Chem 48:1485–1490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang B, Karlsson R, Oksman P, Kallio H (2001) J Agric Food Chem 49:5620–5629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eccleston C, Yang B, Tahvonen R, Kallio H, Rimbach GH, Minihane A (2002) J Nutr Biochem 13:346–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang B, Kalimo KO, Mattila LM, Kallio SE, Katajisto JK, Peltola OJ, Kallio HP (1999) J Nutr Biochem 10:622–630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Johansson AK, Korte H, Yang B, Stanley JC, Kallio HP (2000) J Nutr Biochem 11:491–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng J, Kondo K, Suzuki Y, Ikeda Y, Meng X, Umemura K (2003) Life Sciences 72:2263–2271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Geetha S, Sai Ram M, Singh V, Ilavazhagan G, Sawhney RC (2002) J Ethnopharmacol 79:373–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kallio H, Yang B and Peippo P (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:6136–6142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tang X (2002) J Hort Sci Biotechnol 77: 177–185

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rösch D, Bergmann M, Knorr D, Kroh LW (2003) J Agric Food Chem 51:4233–4239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jeppsson N, Gao X (2000) Agric Food Sci Finl 9:17–22

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tang X, Kalviainen N and Tuorila H (2001) Lebensm-Wiss u-Technol 34:102–110

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hakkinen S, Auriola S (1998) J Chromatogr A 829:91–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hart DJ, Scott KJ (1995) Food Chem 54:101–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gatke R, Klein G, Wolf D (1990) Erwerbsobstbau 32(8): 224–226

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rousi A, Aulin H (1977) Ann Agric Fenn 16:80–87

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Macheix JJ, Fleuriet A, Billot J (1990) Fruit phenolics. CRC, Boca Raton, pp149–221

  22. Dixon RA, Paiva NL (1995) Plant Cell 7:1085–1097

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hertog MGH, Hollman PCH and Katan MB (1992) J Agric Food Chem 40:2379–2383

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hakkinen SH, Karenlampi SO, Heinonen IM, Mykkanen HM, Torronen AR (1999) J Agric Food Chem 47:2274–2279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hollman PCH, Arts ICW (2000) J Sci Food Agric 80:1081–1093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yamamoto N, Moon JH, Tsushida T, Nagao A, Terao J (1999) Arch Biochem Biophys 372:347–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ibarra M, Perez-Vizcaino F, Cogolludo A, Duarte J, Zaragoza-Arnaez F, Lopez-Lopez JG, Tamargo J (2002) Planta Med 68:307–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yokozawa T, Kim HY, Cho EJ, Choi JS, Chung HY (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:5490–5495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kudritskaya SE, Zagorodskaya LM, Shishkina EE (1989) Chem Nat Comp 25:724–725

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sergeeva NV, Shapiro DK, Bandyukova VA, Anikhimovskaya LV, Narizhnaya TI (1979) Khimiya Prirodnykh Soedinenii 1:100–101

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mangels AR, Holden JM, Beecher GR, Forman MR, Lanza E (1993) J Am Diet Assoc 93:284–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Johnson EJ, Hammond BR, Yeum KJ, Qin J, Wang XD, Castaneda C, Snodderly DM, Russell RM (2000) Am J Clin Nutr 71:1555–1562

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chasan-Taber L, Willett WC, Seddon JM, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Colditz GA, Speizer FE, Hankinson SE (1999) Am J Clin Nutr 70:509–516

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Albrecht HJ (1990) Gartenbau 37:207–208

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Raffo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raffo, A., Paoletti, F. & Antonelli, M. Changes in sugar, organic acid, flavonol and carotenoid composition during ripening of berries of three seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) cultivars. Eur Food Res Technol 219, 360–368 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-004-0984-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-004-0984-4

Keywords

Navigation