Skip to main content
Log in

Simultaneous quantification of ten cytotoxic drugs by a validated LC–ESI–MS/MS method

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A liquid chromatography separation with electrospray ionisation and tandem mass spectrometry detection method was developed for the simultaneous quantification of ten commonly handled cytotoxic drugs in a hospital pharmacy. These cytotoxic drugs are cytarabine, gemcitabine, methotrexate, etoposide phosphate, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, irinotecan, doxorubicin, epirubicin and vincristine. The chromatographic separation was carried out by RPLC in less than 21 min, applying a gradient elution of water and acetonitrile in the presence of 0.1% formic acid. MS/MS was performed on a triple quadrupole in selected reaction monitoring mode. The analytical method was validated to determine the limit of quantification (LOQ) and quantitative performance: lowest LOQs were between 0.25 and 2 ng mL−1 for the ten investigated cytotoxic drugs; trueness values (i.e. recovery) were between 85% and 110%, and relative standard deviations for both repeatability and intermediate precision were always inferior to 15%. The multi-compound method was successfully applied for the quality control of pharmaceutical formulations and for analyses of spiked samples on potentially contaminated surfaces.

Preparation of cytotoxic formulations at the Pharmacy of Geneva University Hospitals

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Delmas A, Gordien JB, Bernadou JM, Roudaut M, Gresser A, Malki L, Saux MC, Breilh D (2009) J Pharm Biomed Anal 49:1213–1220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Perez-Ruiz T, Martinez-Lozano C, Sanz A, Bravo E (2001) Electrophoresis 22:134–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahnik SN, Rizovski B, Fuerhacker M, Mader RM (2004) Anal Bioanal Chem 380:31–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Touzin K, Bussières J-F, Langlois E, Lefebvre M (2009) J Oncol Pharm Pract 15:53–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Turci R, Sottani C, Schierl R, Minoia C (2006) Toxicol Lett 162:256–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. BGW (2009) Forschungsprojekt MEWIP http://www.pharma-monitor.de/download_mewip/MEWIP-Abschlussbericht_Sept_2008.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2010

  7. Latour JF (2008) Eur J Hosp Pharm Pract ESMO Supplement 23–25

  8. Weir PJ, Rigge DC, Holmes A, Fox E (2009) Hosp Pharm Eur 47:58–60

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wallemacq P, Capron A, Vanbinst R, Boeckmans E, Gillard J, Favier B (2006) Am J Health Syst Pharm 63:547–555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Connor TH, Anderson RW, Sissink PJM, Broadfiled L, Power L (1999) Am J Health Syst Pharm 56:1427–1432

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sabatini L, Barbieri A, Tosi M, Violante FS (2005) J Mass Spectrom 40:669–674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sottani C, Porro B, Comell M, Imbriani M, Minoia C (2010) J Chromatogr B 878:2593–2605. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2010.04.030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schreiber C, Radon K, Pethran A, Schierl R, Hauff K, Grimm C-H, Boos K-S, Nowak D (2003) Int Arch Occup Environ Health 76:11–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pethran A, Schierl R, Hauff K, Grimm C-H, Boos K-S, Nowak D (2003) Int Arch Occup Environ Health 76:5–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sottani C, Rinaldi P, Leoni E, Poggi G, Teragni C, Delmonte A, Minoia C (2008) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 22:2645–2659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Turci R, Minoia C (2006) Ann NY Acad Sci 1076:649–656

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Turci R, Sottani C, Spagnoli G, Minoia C (2003) J Chromatogr B 789:169–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmaus G, Schierl R, Funck S (2002) Am J Health Syst Pharm 59:956–961

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sottani C, Turci R, Schierl R, Gaggeri R, Barbieri A, Violante FS, Minoia C (2007) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 21:1289–1296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. IARC (2010) Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans. IARC, Lyon, http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/index.php. Accessed 20 July 2010

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schierl R (2000) Microchem J 67:245–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lenz K, Koellensperger G, Hann S, Weissenbacher N, Mahnik SN, Fuerhacker M (2007) Chemosphere 69:1765–1774

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Geiser L, Rudaz S, Veuthey J-L (2005) Electrophoresis 26:2293–2302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We kindly thank the Proteomics Core Facility at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva (Switzerland) for the loan of the LC–MS/MS instrument.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurent Geiser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nussbaumer, S., Fleury-Souverain, S., Antinori, P. et al. Simultaneous quantification of ten cytotoxic drugs by a validated LC–ESI–MS/MS method. Anal Bioanal Chem 398, 3033–3042 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4243-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4243-1

Keywords

Navigation