Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The need for reference materials when monitoring nitrate intake

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Whether dietary exposure to nitrate metabolites is detrimental or beneficial to human health has long been a matter of controversy. In spite of no consistent epidemiological evidence, nitrate metabolites are associated with the formation of carcinogenic-nitrosamines and gastric cancer. Furthermore, recent studies demonstrate that ingested nitrate plays a role in host defence against gastrointestinal pathogenic bacteria.

Analytical values of nitrate content in foods are essential for estimating nitrate intake. The analytical process is of paramount importance for assessing human nitrate exposure and for establishing a link between these exposures and the current and future observed health effects. Therefore, the quality assurance of the measurement process is crucial to obtaining reliability, comparability and traceability of results.

Certified Reference Materials (CRM) should play a role in the consistency of the measurement process. However, the availability of nitrate CRMs is still poor. When food monitoring is demanded, an approach could be to use In House Reference Materials (IHRM), prepared at a high metrological level, and all preparation steps should be quality driven.

IHRMs were prepared, and available CRMs were used to provide traceability of the process. The homogeneity of IHRM was evaluated using an appropriate statistical design. The stability was monitored using an isochronous method. The material shelf life and storage conditions are presented.

HPLC was optimised for the determination of nitrates in four vegetable categories. When a suite of IHRMs were used, the response of the HPLC system was linear over the range 1 to 8 mg L–1. The detection limit for these compounds was 0.2 μg L−1 and the determination limit 1.2 μg L−1.

The relationship between measurement uncertainty and critical points of the analytical process is presented. The differences in observed relative uncertainty between food categories could reflect current limitations in the food matrix reference materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meah M, Harrinson N, Davies A (1994) Food Addit Contam 11:519–532

    Google Scholar 

  2. Swann P (1975) J Sci Food Agric 26:1761–1770

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tricker A (1997) Eur J Cancer Prev 6:226–268

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Archer D (2002) J Food Protect 65:872–875

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Laurauche M, Anton PM, Garcia-Villar R, Theodorou V, Frexinos J, Bueno L, Fioramonti J (2003) Brit J Nutr 89:777–786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vaessen H, Schothorst R (1999) Food Addit Contam 16:181–188

    Google Scholar 

  7. World Health Organisation (2002) Technical Report Series 913:i-viii, 1–153

    Google Scholar 

  8. EUR 17637 (1997) Reports on tasks for scientific cooperation (SCOOP). Directorate-General III Industry, Brussels

  9. Ysart G, Miller P, Barret G, Farrington D, Lawrance P, Harrison N (1999) Food Addit Contam 16:521–532

    Google Scholar 

  10. Petersen A, Stoltze S(1999) Food Addit Contam 16:291–299

    Google Scholar 

  11. Borawska M, Markiewicz R, Witkowska A (1998) Eur J Clin Nutr 52:489–493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dich J, Järvinen R, Knekt P, Penttilä PL (1996) Food Addit Contam 13:541–552

    Google Scholar 

  13. Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (2003) Reference Materials Catalogues. http://www.irmm.jrc.be/mrm.html. Cited 5 Dec 2003

  14. CORDIS (Community Research and Development Information Service) (2003) Homepage. http://www.cordis.lu/en/home.html. Cited 5 Dec 2003

  15. Oliveira L, Palla-Garcia M, Amaral E, Bartolo M, Vargas C (1997) Actas do 3º Encontro de Química dos Alimentos, Faro, Portugal, pp 46

  16. Alvito P, Oliveira L, Capucho S, Alcobia D, Reis M, Fonseca C, Vasconcelos L, Calhau M (2003) Strategies for Safe Food, 24–26 Sept 2003, Brugge, Belgium, pp 408–411 (ISBN 90-804957-2-7)

  17. IUPAC (2001) Pure Appl Chem 73(4):667–683

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Eurachem-CITAC (2000) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, 2nd edn. Eurachem LGC, Teddington, UK

  19. International Organization for Standardization (1999) ISO Guide 35, 3rd Draft. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

  20. Cortez L, Kramer K (2003) New training tool for use of laboratory reference materials. Ninth International Symposium on Biological and Environmental Reference Materials (BERM9), 15–19 June 2003, Berlin, Germany, Poster A17

  21. International Organization for Standardization (1994) ISO 5725-1:1994 /Cor 1:1998; ISO 5725-2:1994 /Cor 1:2002; ISO 5725-3:1994 /Cor 1:2001; ISO 5725-4:1994; ISO 5725-6:1994 /Cor 1:2001, Geneva, Switzerland

  22. International Organization for Standardization (1998) ISO 5725-5:1998, Geneva, Switzerland

  23. Bonas G, Zervou M, Papaeoannou T, Lees M (2003) Accredit Qual Assur 8:101–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fearn T, Thompson M (2001) Analyst 126:1414–1417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cheng CF, Tsang CW (1998) Food Addit Contam 15:753–758

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Reece P, Hird H (2000) Food Addit Contam 17:219–222

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhong W, Hu C, Wang M (2002) Food Addit Contam 19:1125–1129

    Google Scholar 

  28. Merino L, Edberg V, Fuchs G, Aman P (2000) J AOAC Int 83:365–375

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Eurachem/CITAC (2003) Homepage. http://www.measurementuncertainty.org/. Cited 11 Dec 2003

  30. International Organization for Standardization (1996) ISO 11095:1996. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  31. van der Veen A, Linsinger T, Pauwels J (2001) Accredit Qual Assur 6:26–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. International Organization for Standardization, ISO (2000) Quality management systems-Fundamental and vocabulary. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

  33. International Organization for Standardization, ISO (1993) International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology, 2nd edn. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

  34. Dybkaer R (2003) Accredit Qual Assur 8:46–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bièvre P, Kaarls R, Pieser H, Rasberry S, Reed W (1996) Accredit Qual Assur 1:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vaz D, Castanheira I, Fino H, van der Veen A (2000) OIML Bull 51:8–12

    Google Scholar 

  37. Anglov T, Petersen I, Kristiansen J (1999) Accredit Qual Assur 4:504–510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the staff of the Food Composition Laboratory for technical assistance, Dr. Ricardo Diogo for manuscript revision, and Dr. Maria Antónia Calhau, Head of Department, for her helpful comments, critical reading of the manuscript, and encouragement for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel Castanheira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Castanheira, I., Oliveira, L., Valente, A. et al. The need for reference materials when monitoring nitrate intake. Anal Bioanal Chem 378, 1232–1238 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2382-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2382-3

Keywords

Navigation