Abstract
As protein–protein interactions are critical for all biological functions, representing a large and important class of targets for human therapeutics, identification of protein–protein interaction sites and detection of specific amino acid residues that contribute to the specificity and strength of protein interactions is very important in the biochemistry field. Alanine scanning mutagenesis has allowed the discovery of energetically crucial determinants for protein association that have been defined as hot spots. Systematic experimental mutagenesis is very laborious and time-consuming to perform, and thus it is important to achieve an accurate, predictive computational methodology for alanine scanning mutagenesis, capable of reproducing the experimental mutagenesis values. Having as a basis the MM–PBSA approach first developed by Massova et al., we performed a complete study of the influence of the variation of different parameters, such as the internal dielectric constant, the solvent representation, and the number of trajectories, in the accuracy of the free energy binding differences. As a result, we present here a very simple and fast methodological approach that achieved an overall success rate of 82% in reproducing the experimental mutagenesis data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arkin MR, Wells AJ (2004). Drug Discov 3:301–317
Sharma SK, Ramsey TM, Bair KW (2002). Curr Med Chem Anticancer Agents 2:311–330
Bogan AA, Thorn KS (1998). J Mol Biol 280:1–9
Delano WL, Ultsch MH, de Vos AM, Wells JA (2000). Science 287:1279–1283
Pons J, Rajpal A, Kirsch J (1999). Protein Sci 8:958–968
Keskin O, Ma B, Nussinov R (2005). J Mol Biol 345:1281–1294
Arkin MR, Randal M, DeLano WL, Hyde J, Luong TN, Oslob JD, Raphael DR, Taylor L, Wang J, McDowell RS, Wells JA, Braisted A (2003). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:1603–1608
Gao Y, Wang R, Lia L (2004). J Mol Model 10:44–54
Lopez MA, Kollman PA (1993). Protein Sci 2:1975–1986
Kortemme T, Baker D (2002). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:14116–14121
Kortemme T, Kim DE, Baker D (2004). Sci STKE 219:12–15
Schapira M, Totrov M, Abagyan RJ (1999). Mol Recognit 12:177–190
Aqvist J, Medina C, Samuelsson JE (1994). Protein Eng 7:385–391
Verkhivker GM, Bouzida D, Gehlhaar DK, Rejto PA, Freer ST, Rose PM (2002). Proteins 48:539–557
Kollman PA, Massova I, Reyes C, Kuhn B, Huo S, Chong L, Lee M, Lee T, Duan Y, Wang W, Donini O, Cieplak P, Srinivasan J, Case DA, Cheatham TE III (2000). Acc Chem Res 33:889–897
Wang W, Donini O, Reyes CM, Kollman PA (2002). Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 30:211–243
Massova I, Kollman PA (1999). J Am Chem Soc 121:8133–8143
Wang J, Morin P, Wang W, Kollman PA (2001). J Am Chem Soc 123:5221–5230
Wang W, Kollman PA (2002). J Mol Biol 303:567–582
Reyes CM, Kollman PA (2000). J Mol Biol 295:1–6
Huo S, Massova I, Kollman PA (2002). J Comput Chem 23:15–27
Mosyak L, Zhang Y, Glasfeld E, Haney S, Stahl M, Seehra J, Somers WS (2000). EMBO J 19:3179–3191
Sauer-Eriksson AE, Kleywegt GJ, Uhlen M, Jones TA (1995). Structure 3:265–278
Bhat TN, Bentley GA, Boulot G, Greene MI, Tello D, Dall’AcquaW, Souchon H, Schwarz FP, Mariuzza RA, Poljak RJ (1994). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 9:1089–1093
Case DA, Darden TA, Cheatham TE III, Simmerling CL, Wang J, Duke RE, Luo R, Merz KM, Wang B, Pearlman DA, Crowley M, Brozell S, Tsui V, Gohlke H, Mongan J, Hornak V, Cui G, Beroza P, Schafmeister C, Caldwell JW, Ross WS, Kollman PA (2004). AMBER 8 University of California, San Francisco
Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM Jr, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA (1995). J Am Chem Soc 117:5179–5197
Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura J, Impey RW, Klein ML (1983). J Chem Phys 79:926–935
Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJ (1977). J Comput Phys 23:327–335
Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, DiNola A, Haak JR (1984). J Chem Phys 81:3684–3690
Case DA, Pearlman DA, Caldwell JW, Cheatham III TE, Ross WS, Simmerling CL, Darden TA, Merz KM, Stanton RV, Cheng AL, Vincent JJ, Crowley M, Tsui V, Radmer R J, Duan Y, Pitera J, Massova I, Seibel GL, Singh UC, Weiner PK, Kollman PA (1999). AMBER 6 University of California, San Francisco
Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz ML, Darden T, Lee H, Pedersen LG (1995). J Chem Phys 103:8577–8593
Pastor RW, Brooks BR, Szabo A (1988). Mol Phys 65:1409–1419
Loncharich RJ, Brooks BR, Pastor RW (1992). Biopolymers 32:523–535
Izaguirre JA, Catarello DP, Wozniak JM, Skeel RD (2001). J Chem Phys 114:2090–2098
Tsui V, Case DA (2001). Biopolymers (Nucl Acid Sci). 56:275–291
Rocchia W, Sridharan S, Nicholls A, Alexov E, Chiabrera A, Honig B (2002). J Comput Chem 23:128–137
Rocchia W, Alexov E, Honig B (2001). J Phys Chem B 105:6507–6514
Sitkoff D, Sharp KA, Honig BJ (1994). Phys Chem 98:1978
Moreira IS, Fernandes PA, Ramos MJ (2005). J Mol Struct (Theochem). 729:11–18
Connolly ML (1983). J Appl Cryst 16:548–558
Gao Y, Wang R, Lia L (2004). J Mol Model 10:44–54
Xia B, Tsui V, Case DA, Dyson J, Wright PE (2002). J Biomol NMR 22:317–331
Sheinerman FB, Norel R, Honig B (2000). Curr Opin Struct Biol 10:153–159
Schutz CN, Warshel A (2001). Proteins 44:400–417
Hsieh MJ, Luo R (2004). Proteins 56:475–486
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moreira, I.S., Fernandes, P.A. & Ramos, M.J. Unravelling Hot Spots: a comprehensive computational mutagenesis study. Theor Chem Acc 117, 99–113 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-006-0151-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-006-0151-z