Abstract
The Hippo signalling pathway plays a crucial role in carcinogenesis. Therefore, we hypothesized that genetic variants in genes related to this pathway are associated with the colorectal cancer risk. A case–control study including 1150 patients and 1342 controls was performed to assess the association of genetic variants of genes involved in the Hippo signalling pathway with the risk of colorectal cancer. The results were corrected for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR). We used a regression model to determine the effects of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on the survival of patients with colorectal cancer in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets. An expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analysis was performed using TCGA datasets and the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets were used to provide additional data on the expression of genes in colorectal cancer. The SCRIB rs13251492 G allele was associated with a significantly decreased risk of colorectal cancer (odds ratio (OR) = 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.70–0.89, P = 7.76 × 10–5, P(FDR) = 6.98 × 10–4). Patients with the rs13251492 AG/GG allele experienced a longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) time (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.42–0.99, P = 0.049) than patients with the rs13251492 A allele. The eQTL analysis revealed a significant association between rs13251492 and the expression of the SCRIB mRNA in colorectal tumors. Dual-luciferase reporter assays in DLD-1 and HCT116 cells revealed a lower enhancer activity of the rs13251492 G allele than the A allele. In addition, the SCRIB mRNA was expressed at markedly higher levels in colorectal cancer tissues than in normal tissues. Therefore, we identified the SCRIB rs13251492 variant as a novel colorectal cancer susceptibility locus and provided evidence of its functional relevance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- eQTL:
-
Expression quantitative trait loci
- FDR:
-
False discovery rate
- HR:
-
Hazards ratio
- HWE:
-
Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium
- LD:
-
Linkage disequilibrium
- MAF:
-
Minor allele frequency
- OR:
-
Odds ratio
- OS:
-
Overall survival
- RFS:
-
Recurrence-free survival
- SNPs:
-
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms
References
Atkin W, Dadswell E, Wooldrage K et al (2013) Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 381(9873):1194–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62186-2
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492
Brumby AM, Richardson HE (2003) scribble mutants cooperate with oncogenic Ras or Notch to cause neoplastic overgrowth in Drosophila. Embo j 22(21):5769–5779. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg548
Camargo FD, Gokhale S, Johnnidis JB et al (2007) YAP1 increases organ size and expands undifferentiated progenitor cells. Curr Biol 17(23):2054–2060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.039
Czene K, Lichtenstein P, Hemminki K (2002) Environmental and heritable causes of cancer among 9.6 million individuals in the Swedish family-cancer database. Int J Cancer 99(2):260–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.10332
Dong J, Feldmann G, Huang J et al (2007) Elucidation of a universal size-control mechanism in Drosophila and mammals. Cell 130(6):1120–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.019
Dossa F, Acuna SA, Rickles AS et al (2018) Association between adjuvant chemotherapy and overall survival in patients with rectal cancer and pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection. JAMA Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5597
Dow LE, Humbert PO (2007) Polarity regulators and the control of epithelial architecture, cell migration, and tumorigenesis. Int Rev Cytol 262:253–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0074-7696(07)62006-3
Edgar BA (2006) From cell structure to transcription: Hippo forges a new path. Cell 124(2):267–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.005
Etienne-Manneville S (2008) Polarity proteins in migration and invasion. Oncogene 27(55):6970–6980. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2008.347
Feigin ME, Akshinthala SD, Araki K et al (2014) Mislocalization of the cell polarity protein scribble promotes mammary tumorigenesis and is associated with basal breast cancer. Cancer Res 74(11):3180–3194. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.Can-13-3415
Galli GG, Carrara M, Yuan WC et al (2015) YAP drives growth by controlling transcriptional pause release from dynamic enhancers. Mol Cell 60(2):328–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.09.001
Gardiol D, Zacchi A, Petrera F, Stanta G, Banks L (2006) Human discs large and scrib are localized at the same regions in colon mucosa and changes in their expression patterns are correlated with loss of tissue architecture during malignant progression. Int J Cancer 119(6):1285–1290. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.21982
Gu D, Li S, Ben S et al (2018) Circadian clock pathway-related genes associated with colorectal cancer risk and prognosis. Arch Toxicol 92(8):2681–2689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-018-2251-7
Halder G, Johnson RL (2010) Hippo signalling: growth control and beyond. Development 138(1):9–22. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.045500
Harvey K, Tapon N (2007) The Salvador–Warts–Hippo pathway—an emerging tumor-suppressor network. Nat Rev Cancer 7(3):182–191. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2070
Harvey KF, Pfleger CM, Hariharan IK (2003) The Drosophila mst ortholog, hippo, restricts growth and cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis. Cell 114(4):457–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00557-9
Harvey KF, Zhang X, Thomas DM (2013) The Hippo pathway and human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 13(4):246–257. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3458
Humbert PO, Grzeschik NA, Brumby AM, Galea R, Elsum I, Richardson HE (2008) Control of tumorigenesis by the Scribble/Dlg/Lgl polarity module. Oncogene 27(55):6888–6907. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2008.341
Huyghe JR, Bien SA, Harrison TA et al (2019) Discovery of common and rare genetic risk variants for colorectal cancer. Nat Genet 51(1):76–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0286-6
Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-Year results of the UK MRC CLASICC trial group. J Clin Oncol 25(21):3061–3068. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.09.7758
Jia P, Wang L, Meltzer HY, Zhao Z (2011) Pathway-based analysis of GWAS datasets: effective but caution required. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 14(4):567–572. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1461145710001446
Jiao S, Li C, Hao Q et al (2017) VGLL4 targets a TCF4-TEAD4 complex to coregulate Wnt and Hippo signalling in colorectal cancer. Nat Commun 8:14058. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14058
Keum N, Giovannucci E (2019) Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-019-0189-8
Lee M, Vasioukhin V (2008) Cell polarity and cancer–cell and tissue polarity as a non-canonical tumor suppressor. J Cell Sci 121(Pt 8):1141–1150. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.016634
Liang PS, Chen TY, Giovannucci E (2009) Cigarette smoking and colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 124(10):2406–2415. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.24191
Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK et al (2000) Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer–analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N Engl J Med 343(2):78–85. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200007133430201
Ma S, Meng Z, Chen R, Guan KL (2019) The hippo pathway: biology and pathophysiology. Annu Rev Biochem 88:577–604. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-013118-111829
Marees AT, de Kluiver H, Stringer S et al (2018) A tutorial on conducting genome-wide association studies: quality control and statistical analysis. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 27(2):e1608. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1608
Martin-Belmonte F, Perez-Moreno M (2011) Epithelial cell polarity, stem cells and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 12(1):23–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3169
Meng Z, Moroishi T, Guan KL (2016) Mechanisms of Hippo pathway regulation. Genes Dev 30(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.274027.115
Murphy CC, Harlan LC, Lund JL, Lynch CF, Geiger AM (2015) Patterns of colorectal cancer care in the United States: 1990–2010. J Natl Cancer Inst. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv198
Ouyang Z, Zhan W, Dan L (2010) hScrib, a human homolog of Drosophila neoplastic tumor suppressor, is involved in the progress of endometrial cancer. Oncol Res 18(11–12):593–599. https://doi.org/10.3727/096504010x12767359114045
Pan D (2007) Hippo signalling in organ size control. Genes Dev 21(8):886–897. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1536007
Pan Y, Tong JHM, Lung RWM et al (2018) RASAL2 promotes tumor progression through LATS2/YAP1 axis of hippo signalling pathway in colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer 17(1):102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-018-0853-6
Pearson HB, Perez-Mancera PA, Dow LE et al (2011) SCRIB expression is deregulated in human prostate cancer, and its deficiency in mice promotes prostate neoplasia. J Clin Invest 121(11):4257–4267. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI58509
Sharafeldin N, Slattery ML, Liu Q et al (2015) A candidate-pathway approach to identify gene-environment interactions: analyses of colon cancer risk and survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv160
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2019) Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 69(1):7–34. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21551
St Johnston D, Ahringer J (2010) Cell polarity in eggs and epithelia: parallels and diversity. Cell 141(5):757–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.011
Tapon N, Harvey KF, Bell DW et al (2002) Salvador promotes both cell cycle exit and apoptosis in Drosophila and is mutated in human cancer cell lines. Cell 110(4):467–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00824-3
Vasioukhin V (2006) Lethal giant puzzle of Lgl. Dev Neurosci 28(1–2):13–24. https://doi.org/10.1159/000090749
Wang HY, Long QY, Tang SB et al (2019) Histone demethylase KDM3A is required for enhancer activation of hippo target genes in colorectal cancer. Nucleic Acids Res 47(5):2349–2364. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1317
Wolpin BM, Mayer RJ (2008) Systemic treatment of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 134(5):1296–1310. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.098
Xu X, Chen X, Xu M et al (2019) miR-375-3p suppresses tumorigenesis and partially reverses chemoresistance by targeting YAP1 and SP1 in colorectal cancer cells. Aging 11(18):7357–7385. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.102214
Zhou D, Conrad C, Xia F et al (2009) Mst1 and Mst2 maintain hepatocyte quiescence and suppress hepatocellular carcinoma development through inactivation of the Yap1 oncogene. Cancer Cell 16(5):425–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2009.09.026
Acknowledgements
This study was supported in part by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (Public Health and Preventive Medicine).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZF and MW conceived and designed the experiments. HS and YM wrote the paper. TH and SL contributed reagents/materials/analytical tools. MD, JX, DG, and YW revised the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shen, H., Meng, Y., Hu, T. et al. Genetic variants in Hippo signalling pathway-related genes affect the risk of colorectal cancer. Arch Toxicol 95, 271–281 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-020-02910-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-020-02910-3