Skip to main content
Log in

General equilibrium without utility functions: how far to go?

  • Symposium
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How far can we go in weakening the assumptions of the general equilibrium model? Existence of equilibrium, structural stability and finiteness of equilibria of regular economies, genericity of regular economies and an index formula for the equilibria of regular economies have been known not to require transitivity and completeness of consumers’ preferences. We show in this paper that if consumers’ non-ordered preferences satisfy a mild version of convexity already considered in the literature, then the following properties are also satisfied: (1) the smooth manifold structure and the diffeomorphism of the equilibrium manifold with a Euclidean space; (2) the diffeomorphism of the set of no-trade equilibria with a Euclidean space; (3) the openness and genericity of the set of regular equilibria as a subset of the equilibrium manifold; (4) for small trade vectors, the uniqueness, regularity and stability of equilibrium for two version of tatonnement; (5) the pathconnectedness of the sets of stable equilibria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Najjar N.: Non-transitive smooth preferences. J Econ Theory 60, 14–41 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonelli, G.: Sulla teoria matematica della economia politica, 1886, chap. 16, pp. 333–360. In: Chipman et al. (eds.): Preferences, Utility, and Demand. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich (1971)

  • Arrow K.J., Hurwicz L.: On the stability of the competitive equilibrium I. Econometrica 26, 522–552 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K.J., McManus M.: A note on dynamic stability. Econometrica 26, 448–454 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasko Y.: The graph of the Walras correspondence. Econometrica 43, 907–912 (1975a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasko Y.: Some results on uniqueness and on stability of equilibrium in general equilibrium theory. J Math Econ 2, 95–118 (1975b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasko Y.: Connectedness of the set of stable equilibria. SIAM J Appl Math 35, 722–728 (1978a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasko Y.: Economic equilibrium and catastrophe theory: an introduction. Econometrica 46, 557–569 (1978b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasko Y.: Foundations of the Theory of General Equilibrium. Academic Press, Boston (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasko Y.: The set of regular equilibria. J Econ Theory 58, 1–9 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasko Y.: Economies with price-dependent preferences. J Econ Theory 109, 333–359 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasko Y.: Out-of-equilibrium price dynamics. Econ Theory 33, 413–435 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnisseau J.M.: Regular economies with non-ordered preferences. J Math Econ 39, 153–174 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borglin A., Keiding H.: Existence of equilibrium actions and of equilibrium: a note on the “new” existence theorem. J Math Econ 3, 313–316 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J., Hurwicz, L., Richter, M., Sonnenschein, H. (eds.): Preferences, Utility, and Demand. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu G.: Economies with a finite set of equilibria. Econometrica 38, 387–392 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debreu G.: Smooth preferences. Econometrica 40, 603–615 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierker E.: Two remarks on the number of equilibria of an economy. Econometrica 40, 951–953 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale D., Mas-Colell A.: An equilibrium existence theorem for a general model without ordered preferences. J Math Econ 2, 9–15 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzner D. et al.: Demand and exchange in the absence of integrability conditions. In: Chipman, et al. (eds) Preferences, Utility, and Demand, pp. 254–270. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom T., Mas-Colell A., Sonnenschein H.: The demand theory of the weak axiom of revealed preferences. Econometrica 44, 971–978 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein G., Drazen P.: Anomalies in intertemporal choice: evidence and an interpretation. Q J Econ 107, 573–597 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomes G., Taylor C.: Non-transitive preferences over gains and losses. Econ J 102, 357–365 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milnor J.: Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto V.: Manuel d’Economie Politique. Rouge, Lausanne (1909)

    Google Scholar 

  • Philips M.: Must rational preferences be transitive?. Phil Q 39, 477–483 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson P.A.: Foundations of Economic Analysis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1947)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schecter S.: On the structure of the equilibrium manifold. J Math Econ 6, 1–7 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler D.: Competitive equilibria in markets with a continuum of traders and incomplete preferences. Econometrica 37, 578–585 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer W.: The nontransitive consumer. Econometrica 42, 913–919 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer W., Sonnenschein H.: Equilibrium in abstract economies without ordered preferences. J Math Econ 2, 345–348 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smale S.: Global analysis and economics. III. Pareto optima and price equilibria. J Math Econ 1, 107–117 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walras L.: Eléments d’Economie Politique Pure, 1st edn. Corbaz, Lausanne (1874)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yannelis N.C., Prabhakar N.D.: Existence of maximal elements and equilibria in linear topological spaces. J Math Econ 12, 233–245 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yves Balasko.

Additional information

We are grateful to an anonymous referee of this Journal for insightful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balasko, Y., Tvede, M. General equilibrium without utility functions: how far to go?. Econ Theory 45, 201–225 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-009-0496-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-009-0496-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation