Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The prospective self-controlled study of unilateral transverse process-pedicle and bilateral puncture techniques in percutaneous kyphoplasty

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Many previous studies have reported excellent clinical results with percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP). In contrast, numerous complications and problems have also been reported, such as puncture difficulty, cement leakage, and adjacent vertebral fracture.

Introduction

This study is to evaluate the application and clinical outcomes of unilateral transverse process-pedicle and bilateral PKP in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF).

Methods

A total of 56 cases with two levels thoracolumbar OVCF were randomly assigned for treatment with unilateral transverse process-pedicle and bilateral PKP. The patients were followed up postoperatively and were assessed mainly with regard to clinical and radiologic outcomes. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with mainly the use of a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain. Radiologic outcomes were assessed mainly on the basis of radiation dose and bone cement distribution.

Results

The operation was completed successfully in 56 cases. In the unilateral level, the operation time, the volume of the injected cement, and radiation dose were significantly less than bilateral level. All patients had significantly improvement on VAS score after the procedures, compared with their preoperative period. In the bilateral level, 7 patients had obvious pain in the puncture sites at 1 month postoperatively caused by facet joint violation. With local block treatment, the pain disappeared in all patients at the last follow-up.

Conclusion

Both bilateral and unilateral PKP are relatively safe and effective treatments for patients with painful OVCF. But unilateral PKP received less radiation dose and operation time, offered a higher degree of deformity correction, and resulted in less complication than bilateral.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klazen CA, Lohle PN, de Vries J, Jansen FH, Tielbeek AV, Blonk MC, Venmans A, van Rooij WJ, Schoemaker MC, Juttmann JR, Lo TH, Verhaar HJ, van der Graaf Y, van Everdingen KJ, Muller AF, Elgersma OE, Halkema DR, Fransen H, Janssens X, Buskens E, Mali WP (2010) Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VERTOS II): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet 376:1085–1092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rousing R, Hansen KL, Andersen MO, Jespersen SM, Thomsen K, Lauritsen JM (2010) Twelve-months’ follow-up in forty-nine patients with acute/semiacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated conservatively or with percutaneous vertebroplasty: a clinical randomized study. Spine 35:478–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kallmes DF, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ, Turner JA, Wilson DJ, Diamond TH, Edwards R, Gray LA, Stout L, Owen S, Hollingworth W, Ghdoke B, Annesley-Williams DJ, Ralston SH, Jarvik JG (2009) A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med 361:569–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR, Wark JD, Mitchell P, Wriedt C, Graves S, Staples MP, Murphy B (2009) A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med 361:557–568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rousing R, Andersen MO, Jespersen SM, Thomsen K, Lauritsen J (2009) Percutaneous vertebroplasty compared to conservative treatment in patients with painful acute or subacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: three-months’ follow-up in a clinical randomized study. Spine 34:1349–1354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen YJ, Tan TS, Chen WH, Chen CC, Lee TS (2006) Intradural cement leakage: a devastatingly rare complication of vertebroplasty. Spine 31:379–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cosar M, Sasani M, Oktenoglu T, Kaner T, Ercelen O, Kose KC, Ozer AF (2009) The major complications of transpedicular vertebroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 11:607–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fribourg D, Tang C, Sra P, Delamarter R, Bae H (2004) Incidence of subsequent vertebral fracture after kyphoplasty. Spine 29:2270–2277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barr JD, Barr MS, Lemley TJ, McCann RM (2000) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization. Spine 25:923–928

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Heini PF, Wa Ichli B, Berlemann U (2000) Percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty with PMMA: operative technique and early results. A prospective study for the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures. Eur Spine J 9:445–450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Frankel BM, Monroe T, Wang C (2007) Percutaneous vertebral augmentation: an elevation in adjacent-level fracture risk in kyphoplasty as compared with vertebroplasty. Spine J 7:575–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mathis JM (2006) Percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty: which one do I choose. Skeletal Radiol 35:629–631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Crandall D, Slaughter D, Hankins PJ, Moore C, Jerman J (2004) Acute versus chronic vertebral compression fractures treated with kyphoplasty: early results. Spine 4:418–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grohs JG, Matzner M, Trieb K, Krepler P (2005) Minimal invasive stabilization of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a prospective nonrandomized comparison of vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:238–242

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shindle MK, Gardner JM, Koob J, Bukata S, Cabin JA, Lane JM (2006) Vertebral height restoration in osteoporotic compression fractures: kyphoplasty balloon tamp is superior to postural correction alone. Ostoporosis Int 17:1815–1819

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang YM, Ren ZW, Ma W, Jha R (2013) Current status of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty—a review. Med Sci Monit 19:826–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Urrutia J, Bono CM, Mery P, Rojas C (2008) Early histologic changes following polymethylmethacrylate injection (vertebroplasty) in rabbit lumbar vertebrae. Spine 33:877–882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr Dingjun Hao and Dr Baorong He contributed equally to this work and should be considered as co-corresponding authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to B. He or D. Hao.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards and the Ethics Committees of Hong Hui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University.

Informed consent

Before surgery, informed consent was obtained from all patients after a full explanation of the therapeutic procedure.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, L., He, B., Guo, H. et al. The prospective self-controlled study of unilateral transverse process-pedicle and bilateral puncture techniques in percutaneous kyphoplasty. Osteoporos Int 27, 1849–1855 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3430-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3430-5

Keywords

Navigation