Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the femoral midshaft in children with cerebral palsy using magnetic resonance imaging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Magnetic resonance imaging was used to show that children with quadriplegic cerebral palsy and unable to ambulate independently compared to typically developing children have a remarkably underdeveloped femoral midshaft as indicated by a very thin diameter, a very thin cortical wall, and very low strength estimates.

Introduction

The femoral shaft is very susceptible to fracture in children with quadriplegic cerebral palsy (QCP); however, its structure and strength have not been evaluated.

Methods

The volume and width of the middle third of the femur (midfemur) and its cortical wall and medullary cavity were assessed in children with QCP and unable to ambulate independently and typically developing children (n = 10/group) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Estimates of cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI), section modulus (Z), and polar moment of inertia (J) were also determined.

Results

Total volume of the midfemur and volume of its cortical wall and medullary cavity were substantially lower in children with QCP than controls (51–55%; p < 0.001). In addition, the total midfemur, its medullary cavity and the anterior, posterior, and lateral sections of its cortical wall were thinner (27–43%) in children with QCP (p < 0.001). The midfemur in children with QCP also had remarkably lower CSMI, Z, and J (60–71%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Children with QCP who lack the ability to ambulate independently have midfemurs that are very thin with very thin cortical walls and very low estimated strength. The disparity can be detected using MRI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McIvor WC, Samilson RL (1966) Fractures in patients with cerebral palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 48:858–866

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Presedo A, Dabney KW, Miller F (2007) Fractures in patients with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop 27:147–153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Henderson RC, Lark RK, Gurka MJ, Worley G, Fung EB, Conaway M, Stallings VA, Stevenson RD (2002) Bone density and metabolism in children and adolescents with moderate to severe cerebral palsy. Pediatrics 110:e5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Modlesky CM, Subramanian P, Miller F (2008) Underdeveloped trabecular bone microarchitecture is detected in children with cerebral palsy using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoporos Int 19:169–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ciarelli TE, Fyhrie DP, Schaffler MB, Goldstein SA (2000) Variations in three-dimensional cancellous bone architecture of the proximal femur in female hip fractures and in controls. J Bone Miner Res 15:32–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kleerekoper M, Villanueva AR, Stanciu J, Rao DS, Parfitt AM (1985) The role of three-dimensional trabecular microstructure in the pathogenesis of vertebral compression fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 37:594–597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Majumdar S, Link TM, Augat P, Lin JC, Newitt D, Lane NE, Genant HK (1999) Trabecular bone architecture in the distal radius using magnetic resonance imaging in subjects with fractures of the proximal femur. Osteoporos Int 10:231–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ott SM (1993) When bone mass fails to predict bone failure. Calcif Tissue Int 53(Suppl 1):S7–S13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferretti JL, Capozza RF, Zanchetta JR (1996) Mechanical validation of a tomographic (pQCT) index for noninvasive estimation of rat femur bending strength. Bone 18:97–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dempster DW (2000) The contribution of trabecular architecture to cancellous bone quality [editorial]. J Bone Miner Res 15:20–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Link TM, Majumdar S, Augat P, Lin JC, Newitt D, Lu Y, Lane NE, Genant HK (1998) In vivo high resolution MRI of the calcaneus: differences in trabecular structure in osteoporosis patients. J Bone Miner Res 13:1175–1182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Parfitt AM (1987) Trabecular bone architecture in the pathogenesis and prevention of fracture. Am J Med 82:68–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Siffert RS, Luo GM, Cowin SC, Kaufman JJ (1996) Dynamic relationships of trabecular bone density, architecture, and strength in a computational model of osteopenia. Bone 18:197–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Woodhead HJ, Kemp AF, Blimkie CJR, Briody JN, Duncan CS, Thompson M, Lam A, Howman-Giles R, Cowell CT (2001) Measurement of midfemoral shaft geometry: repeatability and accuracy using magnetic resonance imaging and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 16:2251–2259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bouxsein ML, Myburgh KH, van der Meulen MCH, Lindenberger E, Marcus R (1994) Age-related differences in cross-sectional geometry of the forearm bones in healthy women. Calcif Tissue Int 54:113–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jee D, Gilsanz V, Wren TA (2007) Limitations of peripheral quantitative computed tomography metaphyseal bone density measurements. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:4248–4253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Guo SS, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Mei Z, Wei R, Curtin LR, Roche AF, Johnson CL (2002) 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat 11:1–190

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miller F, Koreska J (1992) Height measurement of patients with neuromuscular disease and contractures. Dev Med Child Neurol 34:55–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Guo SS, Wei R, Mei Z, Curtin LR, Roche AF, Johnson CL (2000) CDC growth charts: United States. Adv Data 314:1–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tanner J (1962) Growth and adolescence. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wood E, Rosenbaum P (2000) The gross motor function classification system for cerebral palsy: a study of reliability and stability over time. Dev Med Child Neurol 42:292–296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Turner CH, Burr DB (2001) Experimental techniques for bone mechanics. In: Cowen SC (ed) Bone mechanics handbook. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 1–35

    Google Scholar 

  23. Puyau MR, Adolph AL, Vohra FA, Zakeri I, Butte NF (2004) Prediction of activity energy expenditure using accelerometers in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36:1625–1631

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Weight Control Information Network (August 2006) Just enough for you. In National Institutes of Health (NIH) Publication No 03–5287

  25. USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies, 1.0. In. Agricultural Research Service, Food Surveys Research Group, Beltsville, MD

  26. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lin PP, Henderson RC (1996) Bone mineralization in the affected extremities of children with spastic hemiplegia. Dev Med Child Neurol 38:782–786

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Binkley T, Johnson J, Vogel L, Kecskemethy H, Henderson R, Specker B (2005) Bone measurements by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) in children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr 147:791–796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Modlesky CM, Slade JM, Bickel CS, Meyer RA, Dudley GA (2005) Deteriorated geometric structure and strength of the mid-femur in men with complete spinal cord injury. Bone 36:331–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Eser P, Frotzler A, Zehnder Y, Wick L, Knecht H, Denoth J, Schiessl H (2004) Relationship between the duration of paralysis and bone structure: a pQCT study of spinal cord injured individuals. Bone 34:869–880

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wehrli FW, Hwang SN, Ma J, Song HK, Ford JC, Haddad JG (1998) Cancellous bone volume and structure in the forearm: noninvasive assessment with MR microimaging and image processing. Radiology 206:347–357

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lingam S, Joester J (1994) Spontaneous fractures in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. BMJ 309:265

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Stallings VA, Cronk CE, Zemel BS, Charney EB (1995) Body composition in children with spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy. J Pediatr 126:833–839

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Samson-Fang LJ, Stevenson RD (2000) Identification of malnutrition in children with cerebral palsy: poor performance of weight-for-height centiles. Dev Med Child Neurol 42:162–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary References Intakes, Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine (1997) Dietary reference intakes for calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, vitamin D, and flouride. In: Institute of Medicine. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (HD050530), the National Osteoporosis Foundation and the United Cerebral Palsy Research and Educational Foundation. We express our deepest gratitude to all research participants and their families. We also thank the staff in the MRI Suite at the AI duPont Hospital for Children.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. M. Modlesky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Modlesky, C.M., Kanoff, S.A., Johnson, D.L. et al. Evaluation of the femoral midshaft in children with cerebral palsy using magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoporos Int 20, 609–615 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0718-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0718-8

Keywords

Navigation