Abstract
An experimental investigation was conducted to compare the blast mitigation performances of water layers, whose mass ratios to an explosive were \( m_{{\text{W}}} /m_{{\text{E}}} = 12.2,44.5,\;{\text{and}}\;107.2 \), with water droplets surrounding the explosive. The blast waveforms were measured using pressure transducers, and the motion of the water layer was recorded using a high-speed camera. When mW/mE was equivalent between the water layer and water droplets, the water layer exhibited less mitigation of the peak overpressure and positive impulse than the water droplets. The results demonstrated high efficiency of the water droplets in blast mitigation and the existence of an optimal apparent density of the water barrier. The velocities of the water layers determined using high-speed photography agreed with the prediction model of the barrier material accelerated by explosion. It suggested that the primary cause of the blast overpressure mitigation by the water layer was the allocation of the explosion energy into the kinetic energy of the water.
References
Chen, L., Zhang, L., Fang, Q., Mao, Y.: Performance based investigation on the construction of anti-blast water wall. Int. J. Impact Eng. 81, 17–33 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.03.003
Pontalier, Q., Loiseau, J., Goroshin, S., Frost, D.L.: Experimental investigation of blast mitigation and particle-blast interaction during the explosive dispersal of particles and liquids. Shock Waves 28(3), 489–511 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-018-0821-5
Loiseau, J., Pontalier, Q., Milne, A.M., Goroshin, S., Frost, D.L.: Terminal velocity of liquids and granular materials dispersed by a high explosive. Shock Waves 28(3), 473–487 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-018-0822-4
Gurney, R.W.: The initial velocities of fragments from bombs, shell and grenades. Technical Report BRL-405, US Army Ballistic Research Laboratory (1943)
Homae, T., Wakabayashi, K., Matsumura, T., Nakayama, Y.: Attenuation of blast wave using water gel. Sci. Technol. Energ. Mater. 67(6), 182–186 (2006) (in Japanese)
Sugiyama, Y., Homae, T., Wakabayashi, K., Matsumura, T., Nakayama, Y.: Numerical simulations on the attenuation effect of a barrier material on a blast wave. J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 32, 135–143 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2014.08.007
Willauer, H.D., Ananth, T., Farley, J.P., Williams, F.W.: Mitigation of TNT and Destex explosion effects using water mist. J. Hazard. Mater. 165, 1068–1073 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.130
Jourdan, G., Biamino, L., Mariani, C., Blanchot, C., Daniel, E., Massoni, J., Houas, L., Tosello, R., Praguine, D.: Attenuation of a shock wave passing through a cloud of water droplets. Shock Waves 20(4), 285–296 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-010-0251-5
Chauvin, A., Jourdan, G., Daniel, E., Houas, L., Tosello, R.: Experimental investigation of the propagation of a planar shock wave through a two-phase gas-liquid medium. Phys. Fluids 23, 113301 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3657083
Tamba, T., Sugiyama, Y., Ohtani, K., Wakabayashi, K.: Experimental investigation of blast wave pressure mitigation by water droplets interaction. Sci. Technol. Energ. Mater. 81(1), 29–32 (2020)
Schwer, D.A., Kailasanath, K.: Numerical simulations of the mitigation of unconfined explosions using water-mist. Proc. Combust. Inst. 31(2), 2361–2369 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.145
Ananth, R., Ladouceur, H.D., Willauer, H.D., Farley, J.P., Williams, F.W.: Effect of fine water mist on a confined blast. Fire Technol. 48(3), 641–675 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-010-0156-y
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by M. Brouillette.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tamba, T., Sugiyama, Y., Ohtani, K. et al. Comparison of blast mitigation performance between water layers and water droplets. Shock Waves 31, 89–94 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-021-00990-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-021-00990-3