Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of blast mitigation performance between water layers and water droplets

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Shock Waves Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experimental investigation was conducted to compare the blast mitigation performances of water layers, whose mass ratios to an explosive were \( m_{{\text{W}}} /m_{{\text{E}}} = 12.2,44.5,\;{\text{and}}\;107.2 \), with water droplets surrounding the explosive. The blast waveforms were measured using pressure transducers, and the motion of the water layer was recorded using a high-speed camera. When mW/mE was equivalent between the water layer and water droplets, the water layer exhibited less mitigation of the peak overpressure and positive impulse than the water droplets. The results demonstrated high efficiency of the water droplets in blast mitigation and the existence of an optimal apparent density of the water barrier. The velocities of the water layers determined using high-speed photography agreed with the prediction model of the barrier material accelerated by explosion. It suggested that the primary cause of the blast overpressure mitigation by the water layer was the allocation of the explosion energy into the kinetic energy of the water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Chen, L., Zhang, L., Fang, Q., Mao, Y.: Performance based investigation on the construction of anti-blast water wall. Int. J. Impact Eng. 81, 17–33 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pontalier, Q., Loiseau, J., Goroshin, S., Frost, D.L.: Experimental investigation of blast mitigation and particle-blast interaction during the explosive dispersal of particles and liquids. Shock Waves 28(3), 489–511 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-018-0821-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Loiseau, J., Pontalier, Q., Milne, A.M., Goroshin, S., Frost, D.L.: Terminal velocity of liquids and granular materials dispersed by a high explosive. Shock Waves 28(3), 473–487 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-018-0822-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gurney, R.W.: The initial velocities of fragments from bombs, shell and grenades. Technical Report BRL-405, US Army Ballistic Research Laboratory (1943)

  5. Homae, T., Wakabayashi, K., Matsumura, T., Nakayama, Y.: Attenuation of blast wave using water gel. Sci. Technol. Energ. Mater. 67(6), 182–186 (2006) (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sugiyama, Y., Homae, T., Wakabayashi, K., Matsumura, T., Nakayama, Y.: Numerical simulations on the attenuation effect of a barrier material on a blast wave. J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 32, 135–143 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2014.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Willauer, H.D., Ananth, T., Farley, J.P., Williams, F.W.: Mitigation of TNT and Destex explosion effects using water mist. J. Hazard. Mater. 165, 1068–1073 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jourdan, G., Biamino, L., Mariani, C., Blanchot, C., Daniel, E., Massoni, J., Houas, L., Tosello, R., Praguine, D.: Attenuation of a shock wave passing through a cloud of water droplets. Shock Waves 20(4), 285–296 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-010-0251-5

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Chauvin, A., Jourdan, G., Daniel, E., Houas, L., Tosello, R.: Experimental investigation of the propagation of a planar shock wave through a two-phase gas-liquid medium. Phys. Fluids 23, 113301 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3657083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tamba, T., Sugiyama, Y., Ohtani, K., Wakabayashi, K.: Experimental investigation of blast wave pressure mitigation by water droplets interaction. Sci. Technol. Energ. Mater. 81(1), 29–32 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schwer, D.A., Kailasanath, K.: Numerical simulations of the mitigation of unconfined explosions using water-mist. Proc. Combust. Inst. 31(2), 2361–2369 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ananth, R., Ladouceur, H.D., Willauer, H.D., Farley, J.P., Williams, F.W.: Effect of fine water mist on a confined blast. Fire Technol. 48(3), 641–675 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-010-0156-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Tamba.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Brouillette.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tamba, T., Sugiyama, Y., Ohtani, K. et al. Comparison of blast mitigation performance between water layers and water droplets. Shock Waves 31, 89–94 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-021-00990-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-021-00990-3

Keywords

Navigation