Skip to main content
Log in

Association between obstetrical anal sphincter injury and postpartum urinary retention: a contemporary nationwide cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Identification and prompt management of postpartum urinary retention after vaginal birth is essential to minimize long-term morbidity. Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) have been identified as a possible risk factor for urinary retention. The objective of this study was to estimate the association between OASIS and postpartum urinary retention and compare the length of hospital stay and cost of admission between postpartum patients who experienced urinary retention and those who did not.

Methods

We conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study of pregnant individuals delivering singleton fetuses via vaginal birth in the United States using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for the association between OASIS and postpartum urinary retention. Simple linear regression was used to compare means.

Results

A total of 2,013,052 delivery admissions were included, which was representative of a population size of 10,065,253 utilizing the complex sampling design of the NIS database. 47,192 (2.34%) admissions sustained OASIS and 5,339 (0.27%) admissions experienced overt urinary retention. After adjusting for potential confounders, vaginal deliveries where OASIS occurred had 3.60 times the odds of postpartum urinary retention compared with vaginal deliveries where OASIS was not sustained (95% CI 3.26–3.97). Postpartum urinary retention was associated with an increased mean length of stay (2.94 vs 2.28 days, p<0.001) and 1.37 times the mean total cost of admission (US$22,946.38 vs US$16,758.85, p<0.001).

Conclusions

Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries are associated with increased odds of postpartum urinary retention compared with vaginal deliveries where OASIS did not occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yip SK, Brieger G, Hin LY, Chung T. Urinary retention in the post-partum period: the relationship between obstetric factors and the post-partum post-void residual bladder volume. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76(7):667–72. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349709024608.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Carley ME, Carley JM, Vasdev G, et al. Factors that are associated with clinically overt postpartum urinary retention after vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(2):430–3. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.123609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Groutz A, Levin I, Gold R, Pauzner D, Lessing JB, Gordon D. Protracted postpartum urinary retention: the importance of early diagnosis and timely intervention. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(1):83–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yip SK, Sahota D, Chang AMZ, Chung TKH. Four-year follow-up of women who were diagnosed to have postpartum urinary retention. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(3):648–52. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.125278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mohr S, Raio L, Gobrecht-Keller U, Imboden S, Mueller MD, Kuhn A. Postpartum urinary retention: what are the sequelae? A long-term study and review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(6):1601–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05074-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Mulder FEM, Hakvoort RA, Schoffelmeer MA, Limpens J, Van der Post JAM, Roovers JPWR. Postpartum urinary retention: a systematic review of adverse effects and management. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(12):1605–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2418-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mustonen S, Ala-Houhala IO, Tammela TLJ. Long-term renal dysfunction in patients with acute urinary retention. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2001;35(1):44–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365590151030804.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tiberon A, Carbonnel M, Vidart A, Ben Halima M, Deffieux X, Ayoubi JM. Risk factors and management of persistent postpartum urinary retention. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018;47(9):437–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.08.002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Buchanan J, Beckmann M. Postpartum voiding dysfunction: identifying the risk factors. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2014;54(1):41–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Glavind K, Bjørk J. Incidence and treatment of urinary retention postpartum. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003;14(2):119–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-002-1014-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lamblin G, Chene G, Aeberli C, et al. Identification of risk factors for postpartum urinary retention following vaginal deliveries: a retrospective case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;243:7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.10.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ching-Chung L, Shuenn-Dhy C, Ling-Hong T, Ching-Chang H, Chao-Lun C, Po-Jen C. Postpartum urinary retention: assessment of contributing factors and long-term clinical impact. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;42(4):367–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.00367.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li Q, Zhu S, Xiao X. The risk factors of postpartum urinary retention after vaginal delivery: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Sci. 2020;7(4):484–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2020.09.002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mulder F, Schoffelmeer M, Hakvoort R, et al. Risk factors for postpartum urinary retention: a systematic review and meta-analysis: risk factors for postpartum urinary retention. BJOG. 2012;119(12):1440–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03459.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. NIS database documentation. 2021. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/nisdbdocumentation.jsp. Accessed 1 May 2022.

  16. Khera R, Angraal S, Couch T, et al. Adherence to methodological standards in research using the National Inpatient Sample. JAMA. 2017;318(20):2011. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.17653.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sarayani A, Wang X, Thai TN, Albogami Y, Jeon N, Winterstein AG. Impact of the transition from ICD–9–CM to ICD–10–CM on the identification of pregnancy episodes in US health insurance claims data. Clin Epidemiol. 2020;12:1129–38. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S269400.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Merriam A, Ananth C, Wright J, Siddiq Z, D’Alton M, Friedman A. Trends in operative vaginal delivery, 2005–2013: a population-based study. BJOG. 2017;124(9):1365–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14553.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ. 1994;308(6933):887–91. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6933.887.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN. Pudendal nerve damage during labour: prospective study before and after childbirth. BJOG. 1994;101(1):22–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13005.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kandadai P, Saini J, Patterson D, O’Dell K, Flynn M. Urinary retention after hysterectomy and postoperative analgesic use. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(5):257–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Beaumont T. Prevalence and outcome of postpartum urinary retention at an Australian hospital. Midwifery. 2019;70:92–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.12.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosenberg M, Many A, Shinar S. Risk factors for overt postpartum urinary retention—the effect of the number of catheterizations during labor. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(3):529–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04010-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. HCUP Quality Control Procedures. 2021. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/quality.jsp#procedures. Accessed 1 May 2022.

  25. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on postnatal care of the mother and newborn. 2014. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/97603. Accessed 1 May 2022.

Download references

Funding

Dalhousie University Ross Stewart Smith Fellowship in Medical Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Stairs: project development, data analysis, manuscript writing; Rolnik: data interpretation, manuscript editing; Pascali: project development, manuscript editing; Clancy: project development, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jocelyn Stairs.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 33 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stairs, J., Rolnik, D.L., Pascali, D. et al. Association between obstetrical anal sphincter injury and postpartum urinary retention: a contemporary nationwide cohort study. Int Urogynecol J 33, 3473–3479 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05346-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05346-8

Keywords

Navigation