Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Low back pain does not improve with surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Our goal was to determine if there is a correlation between low back pain (LBP) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) by assessing for change in LBP after surgical correction of prolapse.

Methods

Patients undergoing POP surgery were recruited to participate. They completed the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a validated back pain questionnaire, at their preoperative and postoperative visits at 1, 3, and 6 months. A higher ODI score (0–100) represents more severe disability. A 9-point change represents a minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The primary outcome was the change in ODI scores from preoperative to 3 months postoperative. We analyzed ODI scores with repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Power analysis showed that a sample size of 50 was needed for 88 % power to resolve a MCID on ODI.

Results

A total of 51 patients were recruited and 43 (84 %), 34 (67 %), and 36 (71 %) completed the 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up, respectively. The mean ODI scores at the preoperative and the 1-, 3-, and 6-month postoperative visits were 15, 19, 9, and 9. The mean ODI score from preoperative to 3 months postoperative improved by 5 points [confidence interval (CI) −9.2 to −0.5, p = 0.03]. Of the participants 7 (20.6 %, CI 11–35 %) experienced a MCID improvement, 24 (70.6 %, CI 56–83 %) reported no substantial change, and 3 (8.8 %, CI 3–20 %) experienced a MCID worsening.

Conclusions

Our study found a statistically significant but not clinically significant improvement of LBP after surgical repair of prolapse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I et al (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women’s Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:1160–1166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berek J, Adashi E, Hillard P (1996) Berek & Novak’s gynecology, 12th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schorge J, Schaffer J, Halvorson L (2008) Williams gynecology, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill, Dallas

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scott J, Gibbs R, Karlan B, Haney A, Nygaard I (2008) Danforth’s obstetrics and gynecology, 10th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heit M, Culligan P, Rosenquist C, Shott S (2002) Is pelvic organ prolapse a cause of pelvic or low back pain? Obstet Gynecol 99(1):23–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(1):10–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 25(22):2940–2952

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Davidson M, Keating J (2002) A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther 82:8–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trevin Lau.

Appendices

Scaling and scoring of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

figure afigure a

ODI version 2.1a

figure b

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lau, T., Weinstein, M., Wakamatsu, M. et al. Low back pain does not improve with surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 24, 147–153 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1797-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1797-9

Keywords

Navigation