Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient satisfaction after retropubic and transobturator slings: first assessment using the Incontinence Outcome Questionnaire (IOQ)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim of the Incontinence Outcome Questionnaire (IOQ) is to assess quality of life and patient-reported outcome after midurethral slings.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 626 patients with a minimum follow-up period of 1 year were sent the IOQ. Four hundred twenty-two of 626 (67.4%) patient responses were evaluated.

Results

The mean IOQ QoL extended score was 33.7 ± 17.5 and comparable for tension-free vaginal tape (TVT), outside-in transobturator tape (TOT), and inside-out transobturator vaginal tape (TVT-O). Evaluation of IOQ question about readmission revealed a total of 32 patients (18 TVT, 12 TOT, and 2 TVT-O) who underwent a subsequent operation due to sling-related complications. Freedom from reoperation for recurrent SUI at 1, 2, and 5 years was 100%, 99.7 ± 0.3%, and 99.7 ± 0.3% for TVT, 100% for TVT-O, and 94.2 ± 2.5%, 91.9 ± 2.9%, and 89.9 ± 3.5% for TOT, respectively (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Patient satisfaction, assessed using the IOQ, is high after retropubic and transobturator slings. In our collective, relapse incontinence is higher after TOT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmstein U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hunskaar A, Vinsnes S (1991) The quality of life in women with urinary incontinence as measured by the sickness impact profile. J Am Geriatr Soc 39:378–382

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ogah J, Cody JD, Rogerson L (2009) Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7(4):CD006375

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ulmsten U, Petros P (1995) Intravaginal slingplasty (IVS): an ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol 29:75–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Juma S, Brito CG (2007) Transobturator tape (TOT): two years follow-up. Neurourol Urodyn 26:37–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Delorme E, Droupy S, de Tayrac R, Delmas V (2004) Transobturator tape (Uratape): a new minimally-invasive procedure to treat female urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 45(2):203–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Leval J (2003) Novel surgical technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside-out. Eur Urol 44(6):724–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Staskin D, Kelleher C, Avery K, Bosch R, Cotterill N, Coyne K, Emmanuel A, Yoshida M, Kopp Z (2009) Initial assessment of urinary and faecal incontinence in adult male and female patients. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (eds) Incontinence. Health publication Ltd, Paris, pp 363–389

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nilsson CG, Palva K, Rezapour M, Falconer C (2008) Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 19(8):1043–1047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, Kenton K, Norton PA, Sirls LT, Kraus SR, Chai TC, Lemack GE, Dandreo KJ, Varner RE, Menefee S, Ghetti C, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Khandwala S, Rozanski TA, Johnson H, Schaffer J, Stoddard AM, Holley RL, Nager CW, Moalli P, Mueller E, Arisco AM, Corton M, Tennstedt S, Chang TD, Gormley EA, Litman HJ, The Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (2010) Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. NEJM 362(22):2066–2076

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ross S, Robert M, Swaby C, Dederer L, Lier D, Tang S, Brasher P, Birch C, Cenaiko D, Mainprize T, Murphy M, Carlson K, Baverstock R, Jacobs P, Williamson T (2009) Transobturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for stress incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 114(6):1287–1294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Holmgren C, Hellberg D, Lanner L, Nilsson S (2006) Quality of life after tension-free vaginal tape surgery for female stress incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol 40(2):131–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Barber MD, Kleeman S, Karram MM, Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Vasavada S, Ellerkmann M (2008) Transobturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 111(3):611–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bjelic-Radisic V, Dorfer M, Tamussino K, Frudinger A, Kern P, Winter R, Greimel E (2007) The Incontinence Outcome Questionnaire: an instrument for assessing patient-reported outcomes after surgery for stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 18:1139–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Novara G, Artibani W, Barber MD, Chapple CR, Costantini E, Ficarra V, Hilton P, Nilsson CG, Waltregny D (2010) Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 58:218–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ulmsten U, Johnson P, Rezapour M (1999) A three-year follow up of tension free vaginal tape for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynecol 106:345–350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ts L, Chang TC, As C, Chou HH, Tseng LH, Liang CC (2003) Tension-free vaginal tape procedure on genuine stress incontinent women with coexisting genital prolapse. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82:1049–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Karram MM, Segal JL, Vassallo BJ, Kleeman SD (2003) Complications and untoward effects of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Obstet Gynecol 101:929–932

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nilsson CG, Kuuva N, Falconer C, Rezapour M, Ulmsten U (2001) Long-term results of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure for surgical treatment of females stress urinary incontinence. Int Urocynecol J 56(Suppl2):5–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liapis A, Bakas P, Creatsas G (2008) Long-term efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape in the management of stress urinary incontinence in women: efficacy at 5- and 7-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 19:1509–1512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Liapis A, Bakas P, Creatsas G (2009) Tension-free vaginal tape in the management of recurrent urodynamic stress incontinence after previous failed midurethral tape. Eur Urol 55:1450–1458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Amundsen CL, Visco AG, Ruiz H, Webster GD (2000) Outcome in 104 pubovaginal slings using freeze-dried allograft fascia lata from a single tissue bank. Urology 56:2–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schierlitz L, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, Murray C, Thomas E, De Souza A, Lim YN, Hiscock R (2008) Effectiveness of tension-free vaginal tape compared with transobturator tape in women with stress urinary incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 112:1253–1261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. De Ridder D (2009) Editorial comment on: tension-free vaginal tape in the management of recurrent urodynamic stress incontinence after previous failed midurethral tape. Eur Urol 55:1455–1456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dyrkorn OA, Kulseng-Hanssen S, Sandvik L (2010) TVT compared with TVT-O and TOT: results from the Norwegian National Incontinence Registry. Int Urogynecol J. doi:10.1007/s00192-010-1195-0

    Google Scholar 

  26. Long CY, Hsu CS, Wu MP, Liu CM, Wang TN, Tsai EM (2009) Comparison of tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator tape procedure for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 21(4):342–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Latthe PM, Foon R, Toozs-Hobson P (2007) Transobturator and retropubic tape procedures in stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. BJOG 114:522–531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Elzevier HW, Putter H, Delaere KP, Venema PL, Nijeholt AA Lycklama à, Pelger RC (2008) Female sexual function after surgery for stress urinary incontinence: transobturator suburethral tape vs. tension-free vaginal tape obturator. J Sex Med 5:400–406

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sentilhes L, Berthier A, Loisel C, Descamps P, Marpeau L, Grise P (2009) Female sexual function following surgery for stress urinary incontinence: tension-free vaginal versus transobturator tape procedure. Int Urogynecol J 20:393–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lukacz ES, Lawrence ML, Burchette RJ, Luber KM, Nager CW, Buckwalter JG (2004) The use of Visual Analog Scale in urogynecologic research: a psychometric evaluation. AJOG 191:165–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cornelia Betschart.

Additional information

Cornelia Betschart and David Scheiner contributed equally to this study.

No funding was received for this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Betschart, C., Scheiner, D., Hess, E. et al. Patient satisfaction after retropubic and transobturator slings: first assessment using the Incontinence Outcome Questionnaire (IOQ). Int Urogynecol J 22, 805–812 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1366-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1366-7

Keywords

Navigation