Skip to main content
Log in

Regional club convergence in the EU: evidence from a panel data analysis

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate club convergence in income per capita in 194 European NUTS-2 regions using a nonlinear, time-varying factor model that allows for individual and transitional heterogeneity. Moreover, we extend an existing club clustering algorithm with two post-clustering merging algorithms that finalize club formation. We also apply an ordered response model to assess the role of initial and structural conditions, as well as geographic factors. Our results indicate the presence of four convergence clubs in the EU-15 countries. In support of the club convergence hypothesis, we find that initial conditions matter for the resulting income distribution. Geographic clustering is quite pronounced; besides a north-to-south division, we detect high-income clusters for capital cities. We conclude that the main supranational policy challenge is the politically sensitive handling of a multi-speed Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Nevertheless, Monfort et al. (2013) do not establish any causality running from Eurozone membership to a higher growth path. It seems more reasonable to assume that certain economic characteristics of these countries qualified them to join the Eurozone.

  2. GIPS refers to Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain.

  3. Discussions of ordered logit models can be found in Verbeek (2012, chap. 7) and Cameron and Trivedi (2005, chap. 15).

  4. We thank Monika Bartkowska and Aleksandra Riedl for kindly providing us with their Matlab code for the PS procedure.

  5. In fact, the average physical capital formation of British regions in 1980 was on average higher in lower-income clubs, contrary to the capital formation of all other regions (cp. Table 11).

  6. Table 18 summarizes the club composition stability.

  7. Table 19 summarizes the club composition stability.

References

  • Abreu M, de Groot HLF, Florax RJ (2005) A meta-analysis of beta-convergence: the legendary two-percent. Discussion paper, vol TI 2005-001/3. Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam [etc.]

  • Apergis N, Panopulu E, Tsoumas C (2010) Old wine in a new bottle: growth convergence dynamics in the EU. Atl Econ J 38(2):169–181. doi:10.1007/s11293-010-9219-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbia G, Le Gallo J, Piras G (2008) Does evidence on regional economic convergence depend on the estimation strategy? Outcomes from analysis of a set of NUTS2 EU regions. Spat Econ Anal 3(2):209–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azariadis C (1996) The economics of poverty traps part one: complete markets. J Econ Growth 1(4):449–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azariadis CC, Drazen A (1990) Threshold externalities in economic development. Q J Econ 105(2):501–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badinger H, Müller WG, Tondl G (2004) Regional convergence in the European Union, 1985–1999: a spatial dynamic panel analysis. Reg Stud 38(3):241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH, Li Q (2002) On instrumental variable estimation of semiparametric dynamic panel data models. Econ Lett 76(1):1–9. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00025-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ, Lee JW (2013) A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. J Dev Econ 104:184–198. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ, Sala-i Martin X (1992) Convergence. J Polit Econ 100(2):223–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartkowska M, Riedl A (2012) Regional convergence clubs in europe: identification and conditioning factors. Econ Model 29(1):22–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basile R (2008) Regional economic growth in Europe: a semiparametric spatial dependence approach. Pap Reg Sci 87(4):527–544. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00175.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battisti M, Vaio Gd (2008) A spatially filtered mixture of b-convergence regressions for EU regions, 1980–2002. Empir Econ 34(1):105–121. doi:10.1007/s00181-007-0168-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol WJ (1986) Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: what the long-run data show. Am Econ Rev 76(5):1072–1085

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsi MT, Metiu N (2015) The evolution of economic convergence in the European Union. Empir Econ 48(2):657–681. doi:10.1007/s00181-014-0801-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai Z, Li Q (2008) Nonparametric estimation of varying coefficient dynamic panel data models. Econ Theor. doi:10.1017/S0266466608080523

  • Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Canova F (2004) Testing for convergence clubs in income per capita: a predictive density approach. Int Econ Rev 45(1):49–77. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2354.2004.00117.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrado L, Martin R, Weeks M (2005) Identifying and interpreting regional convergence clusters across Europe. Econ J 115(502):C133–C160. doi:10.1111/j.0013-0133.2005.00984.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuaresma JC, Feldkircher M (2013) Spatial filtering, model uncertainty and the speed of income convergence in Europe. J Appl Econ 28(4):720–741. doi:10.1002/jae.2277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf SN, Kourtellos A, Minkin A (2001) The local solow growth model. Eur Econ Rev 45(4–6):928–940. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00120-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf SN, Johnson PA (1995) Multiple regimes and cross-country growth behaviour. J Appl Econ 10(4):365–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertur C, Le Gallo J, Baumont C (2006) The European regional convergence process, 1980–1995: do spatial regimes and spatial dependence matter? Int Reg Sci Rev 29(1):3–34. doi:10.1177/0160017605279453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2015) Financial framework 2007–2013. http://ec.europa.eu/budget/figures/fin_fwk0713/fwk0713_en.cfm#cf07_13

  • Fiaschi D, Lavezzi AM (2007) Productivity polarization and sectoral dynamics in European regions. J Macroecon 29(3):612–637. doi:10.1016/j.jmacro.2007.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer MM, Stirböck C (2006) Pan-European regional income growth and club-convergence: insights from a spatial econometric perspective. Ann Reg Sci 40(4):693–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer MM, Stumpner P (2008) Income distribution dynamics and cross-region convergence in europe: spatial filtering and novel stochastic kernel representations. J Geogr Syst 10:109–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsche U, Kuzin V (2011) Analysing convergence in Europe using the non-linear single factor model. Empir Econ 41:343–369. doi:10.1007/s00181-010-0385-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galor O (1996) Convergence? Inferences from theoretical models. Econ J 106(437):1056–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getis A, Ord JK (1992) The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr Anal 24(3):189–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodrick RJ, Prescott EC (1997) Postwar U.S. business cycles: an empirical investigation. J Money Credit Bank 29:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam N (1995) Growth empirics: a panel data approach. Q J Econ 110(4):1127–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Stengos T (1996) Semiparametric estimation of partially linear panel data models. J Econ 71(1–2):389–397. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01711-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Rodriguez J (2008) Regional convergence in the European Union: results from a panel data model. Econ Bull 18(2):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw NG, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q J Econ 107(2):407–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monfort M, Cuestas JC, Ordónez J (2013) Real convergence in Europe: a cluster analysis. Econ Model 33:689–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olejnik A (2008) Using the spatial autoregressively distributed lag model in assessing the regional convergence of per-capita income in the EU25. Pap Reg Sci 87(3):371–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran M, Smith R (1995) Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Econ 68(1):79–113. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01644-F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB, Sul D (2003) The elusive empirical shadow of growth convergence. Cowles Foundation discussion paper (1398)

  • Phillips PCB, Sul D (2007) Transition modeling and econometric convergence tests. Econometrica 75(6):1771–1855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB, Sul D (2009) Economic transition and growth. J Appl Econ 24(7):1153–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postiglione P, Benedetti R, Lafratta G (2010) A regression tree algorithm for the identification of convergence clubs. Comput Stat Data An 54(11):2776–2785. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2009.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postiglione P, Andreano MS, Benedetti R (2013) Using constrained optimization for the identification of convergence clubs. Comput Econ 42(2):151–174. doi:10.1007/s10614-012-9325-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramajo J, Márquez MA, Hewings GJD, Salinas-Jiménez MM (2008) Spatial heterogeneity and interregional spillovers in the European Union: do cohesion policies encourage convergence across regions? Eur Econ Rev 52(3):551–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravn MO, Uhlig H (2002) On adjustment the Hodrick–Prescott filter for frequency of observations. Rev Econ Stat 84(2):371–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson D, Symons J (1992) Some strange properties of panel data estimators. J Appl Econom 7(2):175–189. doi:10.1002/jae.3950070206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek M (2012) A guide to modern econometrics, 4th edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge three anonymous referees for valuable comments on an earlier draft. We also thank the participants of the 8th RGS Doctoral Conference on Economics in February 2015 for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rasmus Thoennessen.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.

Table 9 Variables and sources
Table 10 Summary statistics
Table 11 Average p.c. gross fixed capital formation in 1980 (in Euro)
Table 12 Robustness: marginal effects on probabilities (ordered logit) with geographic controls
Table 13 Results of the log t test, 1990–2011
Table 14 Results of the log t test, 1990–2007
Table 15 Results of the log t test, 1980–2011, \(r=0.2\)
Table 16 Results of the log t test, 1980–2011, \(r=0.4\)
Table 17 Stability of club composition: change in the truncation parameter
Table 18 Stability of club composition: change in the significance level
Table 19 Stability of club composition: Eurozone panel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

von Lyncker, K., Thoennessen, R. Regional club convergence in the EU: evidence from a panel data analysis. Empir Econ 52, 525–553 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1096-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1096-2

Keywords

Navigation