Abstract
This paper presents an alternative framework for the decomposition of the Malmquist productivity index by using the concept of a metafrontier. The approach employed allows the calculation of technical efficiency changes, as well as technical changes, for economic agents operating under different technologies. It also enables the computation of the technological gap and its changes for economic agents operating under different technologies. This framework is applied to the analysis of panel data on 58 countries over a period of 31 years from 1970 to 2000. The empirical results show that Asian countries have attempted to move towards the frontier technology and that European countries have taken the lead in the world frontier technology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Battese GE, Rao DSP (2002) Technology gap, efficiency, and a stochastic metafrontier function. Int J Bus Econ 1: 87–93
Battese GE, Rao DSP, O’Donnell CJ (2004) A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies. J Prod Anal 21: 91–103
Caves DW, Christensen LR, Diewert WE (1982) The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica 50: 1393–1414
Chang C, Luh Y (2000) Efficiency change and growth in productivity: the asian growth experience. J Asian Econ 10: 551–570
Coelli TJ, Rao DSP (2005) Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: a malmquist index analysis of 93 countries, 1980–2000. Agric Econ 32: 115–134
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK, Yaisawarng S (1993) Derivation of shadow prices for undesirable outputs: a distance function approach. Rev Econ Stat 75: 374–380
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang Z (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am Econ Rev 84: 66–83
Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productivity efficiency. J R Stat Soc Ser A 120: 252–267
Grifell-Tatjé E, Lovell CAK (1999) A generalized Mamlquist productivity index. Soc Est Inv Oper 7: 81–101
Hayami Y (1969) Sources of agricultural productivity gap among selected countries. Am J Agric Econ 51: 564–575
Hayami Y, Ruttan VW (1970) Agricultural productivity differences among countries. Am Econ Rev 60: 895–911
Hayami Y, Ruttan VW (1971) Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Lall P, Featherstone AM, Norman DW (2002) Productivity growth in the western hemisphere (1978–94): The Caribbean in perspective. J Prod Anal 17: 213–231
Lee YH (2006) A stochastic production frontier model with group-specific temporal variation in technical efficiency. Eur J Oper Res 174: 1616–1630
Pastor JT, Lovell CAK (2005) A global Malmquist productivity index. Econ Lett 88: 266–271
Rezitis AN (2009) Efficiency and productivity effects of bank mergers: evidence from the greek banking industry. Econ Model (in press)
Ruttan VW, Binswanger HP, Hayami Y et al (1978) Induced innovation: technology, institution, and developments. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Trueblood MA, Coggins J (2003) Intercountry agricultural efficiency and productivity: a Malmquist index approach. World Bank, Washington
Tulkens H, Vanden Eeckaut P (1995) Non-parametric efficiency, progress and regress measures for panel data: Methodological aspects. Eur J Oper Res 80: 474–499
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oh, Dh., Lee, Jd. A metafrontier approach for measuring Malmquist productivity index. Empir Econ 38, 47–64 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0255-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0255-0