Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Development of a laboratory-scale Upset Protrusion Joining (UPJ) system for dissimilar materials

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Magnesium alloys have a significant benefit over steel and aluminum alloys in manufacturing components for many automotive and structural applications because of their higher light-weighting potential, lowest density, and higher strength to weight ratio. However, one of the impediments to the success of multi-material integration of the above materials for automotive manufacturing is joining these materials together without any cracking or corrosion during in-service use. The present work aims to develop and demonstrate a cost-effective, novel, and versatile mechanical joining technique, named Upset Protrusion Joining (UPJ), to mechanically and rapidly join a cast magnesium component to an aluminum alloy sheet. The process involves a cylindrical protrusion emanating perpendicular to the flat surface of a cast plate that fits through a hole in an aluminum sheet. The two components are then clamped together, electrically heated, and compressed perpendicular to the protrusion axis. During compression, the protrusion expands circumferentially to fill the hole as well as the region above the hole, thus entrapping the sheet metal between the mushroomed head and the casting. The effect of different UPJ process parameters such as applied current, current duration, compression loading rate, and compression distance were studied through experimentation on die-cast magnesium alloy, with protrusion of 11 mm diameter and 14 mm height. Material-specific process window was identified to achieve a satisfactory joint quality in terms of post-UPJ joint strength with appearance. UPJ method shows a great promise to implement in automotive and other industrial manufacturing environments for fastening cast components to a similar or dissimilar wrought sheet component.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The raw and processed data required to reproduce the present work’s findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study. Some data is available upon request.

References

  1. Kainer KU, Dieringa H, Dietzel W, Hort N, Blawert C (2006) The use of magnesium alloys: past, present and future. In: Pekguleryuz MO, Mackenzie LWF (eds) “Magnesium Technology in the Global Age”, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Magnesium Technology in the Global Age, Montreal, QC, Canada, October 1-4, 2006. Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, Montreal, pp 3–19

    Google Scholar 

  2. Luo AA (2004) Recent magnesium alloy development for elevated temperature applications. Int Mater Rev 49:13–30. https://doi.org/10.1179/095066004225010497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schubert E, Klassen M, Zerner I, Walz C, Sepold G (2001) Light-weight structures produced by laser beam joining for future applications in automobile and aerospace industry. J Mater Process Technol 115:2–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00756-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cam G, Kocak M (1998) Progress in joining of advanced materials. Int Mater Rev 43:1–44. https://doi.org/10.1179/imr.1998.43.1.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cole GS, Sherman AM (1995) Light weight materials for automotive applications. Mater Charact 35:3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/1044-5803(95)00063-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu L, Ren D, Liu F (2014) A review of dissimilar welding techniques for magnesium alloys to aluminum alloys. Materials 7:3735–3757. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7053735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Manladan SM, Yusof F, Ramesh S, Fadzil M (2016) A review on resistance spot welding of magnesium alloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86:1805–1825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8258-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu P, Li YJ, Geng HR, Wang J (2007) Microstructure characteristics in TIG welded joint of Mg/Al dissimilar materials. Mater Lett 61:1288–1291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2006.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Scherm F, Bezold J, Glatzel U (2012) Laser welding of Mg alloy MgAl3Zn1 (AZ31) to Al alloy AlMg3 (AA5754) using ZnAl filler material. Sci Technol Weld Join 17:364–367. https://doi.org/10.1179/136217112X13333824902080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu F, Zhang ZD, Liu LM (2012) Microstructure evolution of Al/Mg butt joints welded by gas tungsten arc with Zn filler metal. Mater Charact 69:84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2012.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cam G (2011) Friction stir welded structural materials: beyond Al-alloys. Int Mater Rev 56(1):1–48. https://doi.org/10.1179/095066010X12777205875750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heidarzadeh F, Mironov S, Kaibyshev R, Cam G, Simar A, Gerlich A, Khodabakhshi F, Mostafaei A, Field DP, Robson JD, Deschamps A, Withers PJ (2020) Friction stir welding/processing of metals and alloys: a comprehensive review on microstructural evolution. Prog Mater Sci:100752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100752

  13. Kashaev N, Ventzke V, Cam G (2018) Prospects of laser beam welding and friction stir welding processes for aluminum airframe structural applications. J Manuf Process 36:571–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cam G, İpekoğlu G (2017) Recent developments in joining of aluminium alloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(5-8):1851–1866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9861-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bozkurt Y, Salman S, Cam G (2013) Effect of welding parameters on lap-shear tensile properties of dissimilar friction stir spot welded AA5754-H22/2024-T3 joints. Sci Technol Weld Join 18(4):337–345. https://doi.org/10.1179/1362171813Y.0000000111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Logan SD, Langer DM (2012) Upset Protrusion Joining. US Patent US 2012/0210558 A1

  17. Logan S (2017) Chrysler Upset Joining techniques for joining dissimilar metals, United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/1395240

  18. Mucha J, Kaščák L, Spišák E (2011) Joining the car-body sheets using clinching process with various thickness and mechanical property arrangements. Arch Civ Mech Eng 11:135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pan H, Pan F, Yang R, Peng J, Zhao C, She J, Gao Z, Tang A (2014) Thermal and electrical conductivity of binary magnesium alloys. J Mater Sci 49:3107–3124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-8012-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr. Sumanth Shankar of the McMaster University and Mr. Steve Logan of Fiat Chrysler Automotive (FCA) for their technical support and many discussions. The authors would also like to acknowledge the technical support of Mr. Ron Lodewyks, Mr. Clealand Berwick, Mr. Joe Verhaeghe, Mr. Michal Lee, Mr. John Colenbrander, and Mr. Mark MacKenzie, all part of the Faculty of Engineering at the McMaster University, in the design and development of UPJ system.

Funding

This research was carried out and financially supported under the Automotive Partnership Canada (APC) program of the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada with Dr. Sumanth Shankar of Department of Mechanical Engineering, McMaster University, as Principal Investigator.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, L8S 4L7, Canada

    Nicholas Andreae, Dharmendra Chalasani & Mukesh Jain

  2. Marine Additive Manufacturing Centre of Excellence (MAMCE), University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, E3B 5A1, Canada

    Dharmendra Chalasani

Authors
  1. Nicholas Andreae
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dharmendra Chalasani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mukesh Jain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

N. Andreae: conceptualization, visualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, software, validation, and writing—original draft. C. Dharmendra: investigation, methodology, and writing—original draft. M.K. Jain: conceptualization, visualization, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, and writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dharmendra Chalasani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This article contains research, which is original, unpublished, and has neither previously nor simultaneously been submitted anywhere else. It is not being submitted to any other journal as well.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Andreae, N., Chalasani, D. & Jain, M. Development of a laboratory-scale Upset Protrusion Joining (UPJ) system for dissimilar materials. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 113, 2725–2738 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06826-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06826-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation