Skip to main content
Log in

Surface roughness analysis in finishing end-milling of duplex stainless steel UNS S32205

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Duplex stainless steel (DSS) UNS S32205 presents high resistance to oxidation, corrosion, and corrosion under stress associated with good mechanical properties, thus being widely used in oil exploration and chemical treatment systems. Due to these characteristics, studies on surface quality are justified in the machining of such materials. In this work, dry machining end-milling tests were performed with positive geometry cutting tools (coated carbide inserts with tip radius of 0.4 mm) with different cutting parameters. Each cutting parameter was evaluated in three levels, combined through Box-Behnken Design of experiments (BBD): cutting speed (30, 45, 60 m/min), feed per tooth (0.05, 0.1, 0.15 mm/tooth), and depth of cut (0.2, 0.4, 0.6 mm). Two surface roughness parameters (Ra and Rz) were measured in the machined surfaces under different cutting combinations. Roughness profiles were analyzed for the highest and lowest measured values of surface roughness, and Abbott-Firestone Curve (AFC) and amplitude-probability distribution (APD) represented its statistical profile. In this way, appropriate combination of cutting parameters for minimum Ra and Rz parameters obtained after finishing end-milling of UNS S32205 were determined, as well as AFC and APD of these values, thus allowing the characterization of the performance of tool-workpiece pair in DSS cutting, resulting in Ra and Rz values of 0.182 and 1.302 μm, respectively. Low surface roughness values were validated using BBD, representation of the statistical profile, and optimization of cutting parameters improved the little bibliographical material in DSS milling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benardos PG, Vosniakos G-C (2003) Predicting surface roughness in machining: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(8):833–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00059-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bordinassi EC (2006) Contribution to the study of the surface integrity of a super duplex stainless steel after machining. 221 f. PhD Thesis, Mechanical Engineering, POLI-USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil (in Portuguese). https://doi.org/10.11606/T.3.2006.tde-22042007-135903

  3. Cabrera J (2003) Hot deformation of duplex stainless steels. J Mater Process Technol 143-144:321–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00434-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferreira SLC, Bruns RE, Silva EGP, Santos WNL, Quintella CM, David JM, Andrade JB, Breitkreitz MC, Jardim ICSF, Neto BB (2007) Statistical designs and response surface techniques for the optimization of chromatographic systems. J Chromatogr A 1158(1–2):2–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.03.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gouveia RM, Silva FJG, Reis P, Baptista APM (2016) Machining duplex stainless steel: comparative study regarding end mill coated tools. Coatings 6(4):6–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings6040051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gunn RN (1997) Duplex stainless steel: microstructure, properties and applications. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge 216p. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9781855733183

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. IMOA (2014) Practical guidelines for the fabrication of duplex stainless steels, 3rd edn. International Molybdenum Association, Pittsburgh TMR Stainless, 48p. http://www.imoa.info/download_files/stainless-steel/Duplex_Stainless_Steel_3rd_Edition.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jebaraj AV, Ajaykumar L, Deepak CR, Aditya KVV (2017) Weldability, machinability and surfacing of commercial duplex stainless steel AISI2205 for marine applications—a recent review. J Adv Res 8(3):183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2017.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Klocke F (2011) Manufacturing processes 1—cutting. RWTH edition. Springer, 504p, Berlin-Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11979-8

    Google Scholar 

  10. Korkut I, Kasap M, Ciftci I, Seker U (2004) Determination of optimum cutting parameters during machining of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. Mater Des 25(4):303–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2003.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M’Saoubi R, Outeiro JC, Changeux B, Lebrun JL, Dias AM (1999) Residual stress snalysis in orthogonal machining of standard and ressulfurized AISI 316L steels. J Mater Process Technol 96(1–3):225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00359-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Manohar M, Joseph J, Selvaraj T, Sivakumar D (2013) Application of Box Behnken design to optimize the parameters for turning Inconel 718 using coated carbide tools. Int J Sci Eng Res 4(4):620–642 https://www.ijser.org/researchpaper/Application-of-Box-Behnken-design-to-optimize-the-parameters-for-turning-Inconel-718-using-coated-carbide-tools.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pawlus P, Grabon W (2008) The method of truncation parameters measurement from material ratio curve. Precis Eng 32(4):342–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2008.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Petropoulos, P.G.N., Pandazaras, N.P., Davim, J.P. (2010) Surface texture characterization and evaluation related to machining. In: Davim, J. Paulo Surface integrity in machining. London: Springer, Cap 2, p. 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-874-2_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Philip SD, Chandramohan P, Rajesh PK (2015) Prediction of surface roughness in end milling operation of duplex stainless steel using response surface methodology. J Eng Sci Technol 10(3):340–352 http://jestec.taylors.edu.my/V10Issue3.htm

    Google Scholar 

  16. Raymundo EA, Ambrozin EW, Ribeiro RB, Toledo JVR, Souza JVC (2014) Análises dos cavacos gerados no processo de fresamento do aço inoxidável duplex UNS S31803 (SAF 2205) como recebido. Rev Gestão Tecnol 1(2):13–20. https://doi.org/10.24279/jmgmt.v2i1.141

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rousset NBS, Chaouachi MA, Chellouf A (1996) Role of surface finishing on pitting corrosion of a duplex stainless steel in sea water. J Mater Eng Perform 5(2):225–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02650891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shashanka R (2016) Fabrication of nano-structured duplex and ferritic stainless steel by planetary milling followed by consolidation. 194 f. PhD Thesis. Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, NIT Rourkela, India, http://ethesis.nitrkl.ac.in/8043/

  19. Tavares SMO (2005) Analysis of surface roughness and models of mechanical contacts. 134 f. MSc Dissertation. Facoltà di Ingegneria (Università di Pisa) / Faculdade de Engenharia (Universidade do Porto) https://paginas.fe.up.pt/~em00021/eramus/project_english.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Megaligas Co. for the donation of workpieces, Walter Tools for the donation of cutting tools, Foundry Laboratory (LAFUN-UFRGS) for the chemical analysis, and CAPES (grant 2017/1691358) for the student scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André J. Souza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Policena, M.R., Devitte, C., Fronza, G. et al. Surface roughness analysis in finishing end-milling of duplex stainless steel UNS S32205. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98, 1617–1625 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2356-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2356-4

Keywords

Navigation