Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of geometrical parameters on the strength and energy absorption of the height-reduced joint

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to reduce the height of the protrusion on the clinched joint, a height-reducing method by compressing the joint was studied in the present work. An investigation of effects of geometrical parameters on the strength and energy absorption of the height-reduced joint was carried out by experimental method. A series of experiments were performed by varying the geometrical parameters of the joints. Different forming displacements were applied to generate different geometrical parameters in the mechanical clinching process. The tensile strength of the height-reduced joint is higher than that of the mechanical clinched joint. The height-reduced joint with a bottom thickness of 1.5 mm has the highest tensile strength. The height-reducing method can contribute to increase the energy absorption of the joint. The strength and energy absorption of the joint depend on the neck thickness in this study. The height-reducing method can increase the tensile strength and energy absorption of the joint by increasing the neck thickness. The height-reducing method with a pair of flat dies is a helpful subsequent process of conventional mechanical clinching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee CJ, Kim JY, Lee SK, Ko DC, Kim BM (2010) Design of mechanical clinching tools for joining of aluminium alloy sheets. Mater Des 31:1854–1861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abe Y, Kato T, Mori K, Nishino S (2014) Mechanical clinching of ultra-high strength steel sheets and strength of joints. J Mater Process Technol 214:2112–2118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lambiase F, Di Ilio A, Paotetti A (2015) Joining aluminium alloys with reduced ductility by mechanical clinching. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77(5):1295–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mucha J, Witkowski W (2014) The clinching joints strength analysis in the aspects of changes in the forming technology and load conditions. Thin-Walled Struct 82:55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mucha J, Witkowski W (2013) The experimental analysis of the double joint type change effect on the joint destruction process in uniaxial shearing test. Thin-Walled Struct 66:39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mucha J, Kaščák L, Spišák E (2013) The experimental analysis of forming and strength of clinch riveting sheet metal joint made of different materials. Adv Mech Eng 5:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mucha J, Kaščák L, Spišák E (2011) Joining the car-body sheets using clinching process with various thickness and mechanical property arrangements. Arch Civ Mech Eng 11(1):135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wen T, Huang Q, Liu Q, Ou WX, Zhang S (2014) Joining different metallic sheets without protrusion by flat hole clinching process. Int J Adv Manuf Techn. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7936-y

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lambiase F (2015) Mechanical behaviour of polymer–metal hybrid joints produced by clinching using different tools. Mater Des 87(15):606–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen C, Zhao SD, Han XL, Cui MC, Fan SQ (2016) Optimization of a reshaping rivet to reduce the protrusion height and increase the strength of clinched joints. J Mater Process Technol 234:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eshtayeh M, Hrairi M (2016) Recent and future development of the application of finite element analysis in clinching process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84(9):2589–2608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. He XC, Zhao L, Yang HY, Xing BY, Wang YQ, Deng CJ, Gu FS, Ball A (2014) Investigations of strength and energy absorption of mechanical clinched joints. Comput Mater Sci 94:58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lambiase F (2013) Influence of process parameters in mechanical clinching with extensible dies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66:2123–2131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Coppieters S, Lava P, Hecke RV, Cooreman S, Sol H, Houtte PV, Debruyne D (2013) Numerical and experimental study of the multi-axial quasi-static strength of clinched connections. Int J Mat Form 3:437–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. He XC, Liu FL, Xing BY, Yang HY, Wang YQ, Deng CJ, Gu FS, Ball A (2014) Numerical and experimental investigations of extensible die clinching. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74:1229–1236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Coppieters S, Lava P, Sol H, Van Bael A, Van Houtte P, Debruyne D (2010) Determination of the flow stress and contact friction of sheet metal in a multi-layered upsetting test. J Mater Process Technol 210:1290–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang T, Liu ZX, Wang PC (2015) Quality inspection of clinched joint of steel and aluminum. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(5):1393–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xing BY, He XC, Wang YQ, Yang HY, Deng CJ (2015) Study of mechanical properties for copper alloy H62 sheets joined by self-piercing riveting and clinching. J Mater Process Technol 216:28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lambiase F, Di Ilio A (2015) Mechanical clinching of metal–polymer joints. J Mater Process Technol 215:12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eshtayeh M, Hrairi M, Mohiuddin AKM (2016) Clinching process for joining dissimilar materials: state of the art. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(1):179–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lambiase F, Di Ilio A (2016) Damage analysis in mechanical clinching experimental andnumerical study. J Mater Process Technol 230:109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao SD, Xu F, Guo JH, Han XL (2014) Experimental and numerical research for the failure behaviour of the clinched joint using modified Rousselier model. J Mater Process Technol 214:2134–2145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lambiase F, Di Ilio A (2014) An experimental study on mechanical clinched joints realized with different dies. Thin-Walled Struct 85:71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim HK (2013) Fatigue strength evaluation of the clinched lap joints of a cold rolled mild steel sheet. J Mater Eng Perform 22:294–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lambiase F, Di Ilio A (2013) Finite element analysis of material flow in mechanical clinching with extensible dies. J Mater Eng Perform 22(6):1629–1636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lambiase F, Durante M, Di Ilio A (2016) Fast joining of aluminum sheets with glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) by mechanical clinching. J Mater Process Technol 236:241–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lambiase F, Ko D-C (2016) Feasibility of mechanical clinching for joining aluminum AA6082-T6 and carbon fiber reinforced polymer sheets. Mater Des 107:341–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lambiase F (2015) Joinability of different thermoplastic polymers with aluminium AA6082 sheets by mechanical clinching. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(9):1995–2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Eshtayeh M, Hrairi M, Mohiuddin AKM (2016) Multi objective optimization of clinching joints quality using Grey-based Taguchi method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-016-8471-1

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mori K, Abe Y, Kato T (2012) Mechanism of superiority of fatigue strength for aluminium alloy sheets joined by mechanical clinching and self-pierce riveting. J Mater Process Technol 212:1900–1905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Neugebauer R, Todtermuschke M, Mauermann R, Riedel F (2008) Overview on the state of development and the application potential of dieless mechanical joining processes. Arch Civ Mech Eng 8(4):51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Neugebauer R, Kraus C, Dietrich S (2008) Advances in mechanical joining of magnesium. CIRP Ann-Manuf Techn 57:283–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wen T, Wang H, Yang C, Liu LT (2014) On a reshaping method of clinched joints to reduce the protrusion height. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71(9):1709–1715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jiang T, Liu ZX, Wang PC (2015) Effect of aluminum pre-straining on strength of clinched galvanized SAE1004 steel-to-AA6111-T4 aluminum. J Mater Process Technol 215:193–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lambiase F (2015) Clinch joining of heat-treatable aluminum AA6082-T6 alloy under warm conditions. J Mater Process Technol 225:421–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. He XC, Zhang Y, Xing BY, Gu FS, Ball A (2015) Mechanical properties of extensible die clinched joints in titanium sheet materials. Mater Des 71(15):26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Coppieters S, Lave P, Baes S, Sol H, Van Houtte P, Debruyne D (2012) Analytical method to predict the pull-out strength of clinched connections. Thin-Walled Struct 52:42–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Coppieters S, Cooreman S, Lave P, Sol H, Van Houtte P, Debruyne D (2011) Reproducing the experimental pull-out and shear strength of clinched sheet metal connections using FEA. Int J Mater Form 4:429–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, C., Zhao, S., Cui, M. et al. Effects of geometrical parameters on the strength and energy absorption of the height-reduced joint. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90, 3533–3541 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9619-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9619-8

Keywords

Navigation