Skip to main content
Log in

A new optimization method for sheet metal forming processes based on an iterative learning control model

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aiming at improving the efficiency of process optimization for industrial application, a new intelligent optimization method for sheet metal forming processes is proposed based on an iterative learning control model, which is constructed to imitate the die trial process in production. In this model, process parameters are adjusted according to a learning updating law, in which the deviations between the practical forming quality and the desired forming quality are used to determine input parameters in the next cycle, in combination with experience learned from preceding trials. Each learning process leads to a forming quality deviation smaller than the latest one, and the desired forming quality is obtained when the forming quality deviation becomes small enough to be neglected after several times of learning. To apply this model to actual processes, the forming quality is quantified firstly by accumulating the forming quality of the related elements with their contributions considered. Afterwards, the learning updating law is designed by multiplying the forming quality deviation with a varied learning gain. In the end, the intelligent updating strategy of the learning gain is proposed, which guarantees the proper parameter variation in each trial and gives rise to a fast convergence speed. By using this method, a new optimization algorithm of the drawbead restraining force (DBRF) is proposed, in which the scheme of drawbead segmentation can be decided automatically. The rapidity and practicability of the algorithm are verified by numerical experiments of automobile covering panels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Naceur H, Guo YQ, Batoz JL, Knopf-Lenoir C (2001) Optimization of drawbead restraining forces and drawbead design in sheet metal forming process. Int J Mech Sci 43:2407–2434

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Naceur H, Delameziere A, Batoz JL, Guo YQ, Knopf-Lenoir C (2004) Some improvements on the optimum process design in deep drawing using the inverse approach. J Mater Process Technol 146:250–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huh H, Kim SH (2001) Optimum process design in sheet-metal forming with finite element analysis. J Eng Mater-Tehnol ASME 123:476–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim SH, Huh H (2002) Design sensitivity analysis of sheet metal forming processes with a direct differentiation method. J Mater Process Technol 130–131:504–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sosnowski W, Marczewska I, Marczewski A (2002) Sensitivity based optimization of sheet metal forming tools. J Mater Process Technol 124:319–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ohata T, Nakamura Y, Katayama T, Nakamachi E, Nakano K (1996) Development of optimum process design system by numerical simulation. J Mater Process Technol 60:543–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohata T, Nakamura Y, Katayama T, Nakamachi E, Omori N (1998) Improvement of optimum process design system by numerical simulation. J Mater Process Technol 80–81:635–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu G, Lin ZQ, Bao YX (2002) Optimization design of drawbead in drawing tools of autobody cover panel. J Eng Mater-Tehnol ASME 124:278–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shi XX, Chen J, Peng YH, Ruan XY (2004) A new approach of die shape optimization for sheet metal forming processes. J Mater Process Technol 152:35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sun GY, Li GY, Li Q (2012) Variable fidelity design based surrogate and artificial bee colony algorithm for sheet metal forming process. Finite Elem Anal Des 59:76–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang H, Li EY, Li GY (2009) Development of hybrid fuzzy regression-based metamodeling technique for optimization of sheet metal forming problems. Mater Des 30:2854–2866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu W, Yang YY (2008) Multi-objective optimization of sheet metal forming process using Pareto-based genetic algorithm. J Mater Process Technol 208:499–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Naceur H, Ben-Elechi S, Batoz JL, Knopf-Lenoir C (2008) Response surface methodology for the rapid design of aluminum sheet metal forming parameters. Mater Des 29:781–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu YL, Chen WL, Ding LP, Wang XP (2013) Response surface methodology based on support vector regression for polygon blank shape optimization design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66:1397–1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oguz K, Bulent E (2007) Automated design methodology for automobile side panel die using an effective optimization approach. Mater Des 28:2665–2672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jakumeit J, Herdy M, Nitsche M (2005) Parameter optimization of the sheet metal forming process using an iterative parallel Kriging algorithm. Struct Multidiscip Optim 29:498–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bae GH, Song JH, Huh H, Kim SH, Park SH (2007) Simulation-based prediction model of the draw-bead restraining force and its application to sheet metal forming process. J Mater Process Technol 187–188:123–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang H, Li GY, Zhong ZH (2008) Optimization of sheet metal forming processes by adaptive response surface based on intelligent sampling method. J Mater Process Technol 197:77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Giuseppe I, Rosa DL (2010) A new progressive design methodology for complex sheet metal stamping operations: coupling spatially differentiated restraining forces approach and multi-objective optimization. Comput Struct 88:625–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wei DL, Cui ZS, Chen J (2008) Optimization and tolerance prediction of sheet metal forming process using response surface model. Comput Mater Sci 42:228–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang H, Li EY, Li GY (2008) Optimization of drawbead design in sheet metal forming based on intelligent sampling by using response surface methodology. J Mater Process Technol 206:45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tang BT, Sun JX, Zhao Z, Chen J, Ruan XY (2006) Optimization of drawbead design in sheet forming using one step finite element method coupled with response surface methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31:225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu Q, Liu WJ, Ruan F, Qiu HY (2007) Parameters’ automated optimization in sheet metal forming process. J Mater Process Technol 187–188:159–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun GY, Li GY, Gong ZH, Cui XY, Yang XJ, Li Q (2010) Multiobjective robust optimization method for drawbead design in sheet metal forming. Mater Des 31:1917–1929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ahn HS, Chen YQ, Moore KL (2007) Iterative learning control: brief survey and categorization. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C 37(6):1099–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu JX, Tan Y (2001) On the convergence speed of a class of higher-order ILC Schemes. IEEE Decis Contr P 4932-4937

  27. Du T, Liu YQ, Zhang ZB, Li ZG (2007) Fast FE analysis system for sheet metal stamping—FASTAMP. J Mater Process Technol 187–188:402–406

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stoughton TB (1988) Model of drawbead forces in sheet metalforming. Proc of IDDRG 15th Biennial Congress 205-215

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhibing Zhang.

Ethics declarations

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 2004CB719402.

Conflict of interest

No other conflicts of interest are involved in this research.

Human and animal rights and informed consent

The research is not involving human participants or animals.

Ethical standards

This manuscript complies to the ethical rules applicable for this journal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Q., Liu, Y. & Zhang, Z. A new optimization method for sheet metal forming processes based on an iterative learning control model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85, 1063–1075 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7975-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7975-4

Keywords

Navigation