Skip to main content
Log in

Degradation mode and criticality analysis based on product usage data

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last decade, a rapid development of internet, wireless mobile telecommunication, and product identification technologies make whole product life cycle visible and controllable, which can improve several operational issues over the whole product life cycle: product design improvement, predictive maintenance, rational decision on end-of-life products, and so on. The key element to solve these issues is to assess the degradation status of a product based on gathered data during product usage period. However, despite its importance, due to the interrupted information flow of the product life cycle after product sales, it has not received enough attention in the literature until now. To overcome this limitation, this study develops a decision support method, called degradation mode and criticality analysis (DMCA), for the analysis of product degradation status based on gathered product usage data. The proposed method enables us to identify and assess the degradation status of a product and give a suitable guide for the next action. To show the effectiveness of the proposed approach, a case study for a heavy construction equipment vehicle is introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. PROMISE project commission (2004) PROMISE—integrated project: annex I—description of work. Project proposal

  2. Thomas V, Neckel W, Wagner S (1999) Information technology and product lifecycle management. Proc IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and Environment pp. 54−57

  3. Middendorf A, Griese H, Grimm WM, Reichl H (2003) Embedded life-cycle information module for monitoring and identification of product use conditions. Proc EcoDesign 2003 pp. 733−739

  4. Chao MT (1999) Degradation analysis and related topics: some thoughts and a review. Proc Natl Sci Counc ROC (A) 23(5):555–566

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lu CJ, Meeker WQ, Escobar LA (1996) A comparison of degradation and failure-time analysis methods for estimating a time-to-failure distribution. Stat Sin 6:531–546

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee J (1996) Measurement of machine performance degradation using a neural network model. Comput Ind 30(3):193–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xu H, Kwan CM, Haynes L, Pryor JD (1997) Machine performance degradation monitoring using fuzzy CMAC. Proc the American Control Conference pp. 1363−1364

  8. Huang YS (2001) A decision model for deteriorating repairable systems. IIE Trans 33:479–485

    Google Scholar 

  9. Djurdjanovic D, Lee J, Ni J (2003) Watchdog agent-an infotronics-based prognostics approach for product performance degradation assessment and prediction. Adv Eng Inform 17(3–4):109–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frangopol DM, Kallen MJ, van Noortwijk JM (2004) Probabilistic models for life-cycle performance of deteriorating structures: review and future directions. Prog Struct Eng Mater 6:197–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang P, Coit DW (2004) Reliability prediction based on degradation modeling for systems with multiple degradation measures. Proc RAMS pp. 302−307

  12. Kara S, Mazhar M, Kaebernick H, Ahmed A (2005) Determining the reuse potential of components based on life cycle data. Ann CIRP 54(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kmenta S (2000) A method for predicting and evaluating failures in products and processes, Ph.D. Dissertation. Stanford University

  14. Koç M, Lee J (2001) A system framework for next-generation E-maintenance systems. Technical report, Center for Intelligent Maintenance Systems. Univ. of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

  15. Bluvband Z, Grabov P, Nakar O (2004) Expanded FMEA (EFMEA). Proc RAMS 2004 pp. 31−36

  16. Lee BH (1999) Design FMEA for mechatronic systems using bayesian network causal models. Proc ASME 1999, Las Vegas, USA pp. 1235−1246

  17. Umeda Y, Ishill M, Shimomura Y, Tomiyama T (1996) Supporting conceptual design based on the function-behaviour-state modeler. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 10(4):275–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stamatis DH (2003) Failure mode effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. American Society for Quality Press

  19. Cattaneo C (2006) Development of a new approach for product design improvement, considering middle-of-life (MOL) data. Master thesis, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, EPFL, Switzerland

  20. Dowling NE (1999) Mechanical behavior of materials. Second Edition, Prentice Hall

  21. Monahan CC (1995) Early fatigue crack growth at welds. Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton UK and Boston USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong-Bae Jun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shin, JH., Jun, HB., Catteneo, C. et al. Degradation mode and criticality analysis based on product usage data. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78, 1727–1742 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6782-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6782-7

Keywords

Navigation