Abstract
Synthesis modeling of a geometric error-based traditional method for large-scale grinding machine tools with six axes is too complicated to perform in a real-time compensator with a built-in position control system, and it is difficult to obtain all of the error elements corresponding to the model. This paper proposed a novel strategy in which a machine may be considered as translation axes and rotary axes, and geometric errors of the translation axes and rotary axis are modeled and the geometric error models of the machine are very simple for real-time error compensation. The volumetric errors of the translation axes are measured using spatial circular curve ball bar test, and every element of the rotary axis is also obtained by a series of considerate ball bar tests. According to the characteristics of a position controller used in the machine, a synthesis error compensation system based on the NUM numerical control system was developed. Error compensation experiments were carried out, and the results show that the accuracy of the machine is improved significantly.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Han J, Wang L, Cheng N, Wang H (2012) Thermal error modeling of machine tool based on fuzzy c-means cluster analysis and minimal-resource allocating networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60(5–8):463–472
Schwenke H, Knapp W, Haitjema H, Weckenmann A, Schmitt R, Delbressine F (2008) Geometric error measurement and compensation of machines—an update. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57:660–675
Ramesh R, Mannan MA, Poo AN (2000) Error compensation in machine tools—a review: part I: geometric, cutting-force induced and fixture dependent errors. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 40:1235–1256
Yang SH, Yuan J, Ni J (1996) Accuracy enhancement of a horizontal machining center by real-time error compensation. J Manuf Syst 15:113–118
Jha BK, Kumar A (2003) Analysis of geometric errors associated with five-axis machining center in improving the quality of cam profile. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 43:629–636
Khan AW, Chen WY (2011) A methodology for systematic geometric error compensation in five-axis machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53:615–628
Kong LB, Cheung CF, Toa S, Lee WB, Du JJ, Zhang ZJ (2008) A kinematics and experimental analysis of form error compensation in ultra-precision machining. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 48:1408–1419
Huston RL, Liu YW (1991) Multi-body system dynamics. Tianjin University Press, Tianjin
Yang SH, Kim K-H, Park YK, Lee SG (2004) Error analysis and compensation for the volumetric errors of a vertical machining centre using a hemispherical helix ball bar test. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 23:495–500
Abdul Wahid K, CHEN WY (2010) A methodology for error characterization and quantification in rotary joints of multi-axis machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 51:1009–1022
Guangsheng CHEN, Xuesong MEI, Tao TAO (2011) Convenient strategy for identifying motion errors from rotary table of 4-axis simultaneous control machine tools. Journal of Xi’An Jiaotong University 45(9):6–10
NUM Co. (2007)1020/1040/1050/1060 dynamic operator manual, http://www.num.com, 1–11.
ISO (1997) ISO1328-1:1997(E). Cylindrical gears—ISO system of accuracy, part I: definitions and allowable values of deviations relevant to corresponding flank. ISO, Geneva
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
- E :
-
Spatial error vector
- E cx , E cy , E cz :
-
Projection of spatial errors of rotary axes along the x-, y-, and z-axes
- E tx , E ty , E tz :
-
Projection of spatial errors of translation axes along the x-, y-, and z-axes
- E x , E y , E z :
-
Projection of spatial deviation along the x-, y-, and z-axes
- f pt :
-
Error of single pitch deviation
- f p :
-
Total cumulative pitch deviation
- f Hα :
-
Profile slope deviation
- f fα :
-
Profile form deviation
- f α :
-
Total profile deviation
- f Hβ :
-
Helix slope deviation
- f fβ :
-
Helix form deviation
- f β :
-
Total helix deviation
- Ln(j):
-
N order low-order body of typical j
- T ijP :
-
The static attitude transformation matrix of j body in the subcoordinate of i body
- T ijs :
-
The kinematic attitude transformation matrix of j body in the subcoordinate of i body
- x, y, z, W :
-
Command position of the x-, y-, z-, and W-axes
- α, β, \( \gamma \) :
-
Rotational angles of the A-, B-, and C-axes
- ΔT ijP :
-
Error of static attitude transformation matrix
- ΔT ijS :
-
Error of kinematic attitude transformation matrix
- ΔD :
-
The radius error measured by ball bar
- Δφ xz , Δφ xy , Δφ yz :
-
The squareness errors between the x- and z-axes, x- and y-axes, and y- and z-axes
- Δα zC :
-
Projection of parallelism between the z- and C-axes along the x-axis
- Δβ zC :
-
Projection of parallelism between the z- and C-axes along the y-axes
- Δx, Δy, Δz :
-
The errors of the real point to ideal point in the locus along the x-, y-, and z-axes of multi-machine tools
- Δx x , Δy x , Δz x :
-
The linear position errors of the x-axis along the x-, y-, and z-axes
- Δ\( \alpha \) x , Δ\( \beta \) x , Δ\( \gamma \) x :
-
The roll angle errors of the x-axis along the x-, y-, and z-axes
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, G.S., Mei, X.S. & Li, H.L. Geometric error modeling and compensation for large-scale grinding machine tools with multi-axes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69, 2583–2592 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5203-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5203-7