Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carbon footprint tax on fashion supply chain systems

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the impacts brought by the carbon footprint tax on fashion supply chain systems are analytically examined. First, based on various industrial practices in fashion apparel, we construct the two-echelon manufacturer–retailer analytical fashion supply chain model. Second, by exploring the fashion supply chain with a highly fashionable product, we study how the carbon footprint tax can affect the retailer’s optimal choice of sourcing. We further investigate the significance of carbon footprint tax on fashion supply chain management under two commonly adopted contracts, namely the pure wholesale pricing (WP) contract and the markdown money (MM) contract. Our analytical findings illustrate that: (1) under the WP contract case: A properly set carbon footprint tax, which depends on the product’s manufacturing and shipping costs, and manufacturer’s profit margin, can successfully entice the retailer to source locally. (2) Under the MM contract case where the MM contract is set in a way that the supply chain is coordinated: (a) If the carbon footprint tax is equal to the difference between the product costs from the local and offshore sourcing, then the optimal MM rates and the optimal supply chain product quantities from the local and offshore sourcing modes are the same. (b) Similar to the WP contract case, we prove analytically that a properly determined carbon footprint tax can always entice the retailer to source locally. Further analysis with extended models under the consideration of having a stochastically larger demand with the local sourcing mode is conducted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caniato F, Caridi M, Crippa L, Moretto A (2012) Environmental sustainability in fashion supply chains: an exploratory case based research. Int J Prod Econ 135:659–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ho HPY, Choi TM (2012) A five-R analysis for sustainable fashion supply chain management in Hong Kong: a case analysis. J Fash Mark Manag 16:161–175

    Google Scholar 

  3. Choi TM (2013) Local sourcing and fashion quick response system: the impacts of carbon footprint tax. Transportation Research–Part E. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2013.03.006

  4. de Brito MP, Carbone V, Blanquart CM (2008) Towards a sustainable fashion retail supply chain in Europe: organisation and performance. Int J Prod Econ 114:534–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Elmaghraby W, Gulcu A, Keskinocak P (2008) Designing optimal preannounced markdowns in the presence of rational customers with multiunit demands. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 10:126–148

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gemechu ED, Butnar I, Llop M, Castells F (2012) Environmental tax on products and services based on their carbon footprint: a case study of the pulp and paper sector. Energ Pol 50: 336–344

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hossein M, Zarandi F, Sisakht AH, DavariInt S (2012) Design of a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) model using an interactive fuzzy goal programming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56:809–821

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hua G, Cheng TCE, Wang S (2011) Managing carbon footprints in inventory management. Int J Prod Econ 132:178–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Larsen HN, Solli C, Pettersena J (2012) Supply chain management how can we reduce our energy/climate footprint? Energ Procedia 20:354–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee KH (2011) Integrating carbon footprint into supply chain management: the case of Hyundai Motor Company (HMC) in the automobile industry. J Clean Prod 19:1216–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lo CKY, Yeung ACL, Cheng TCE (2012) The impact of environmental management systems on financial performance in fashion and textiles industries. Int J Prod Econ 135:561–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nagurney A, Yu M (2012) Sustainable fashion supply chain management under oligopolistic competition and brand differentiation. Int J Prod Econ 135:532–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pasternack BA (1985) Optimal pricing and returns policies for perishable commodities. Mark Sci 4:166–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Perry P (2012) Exploring the influence of national cultural context on CSR implementation. J Fash Mark Manag 16:141–160

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aichele R, Felbermayr G (2012) Kyoto and the carbon footprint of nations. J Environ Econ Manag 63:336–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shen B, Choi TM, Wang Y, Lo CKY (2013) The coordination of fashion supply chains with a risk averse supplier under the markdown money policy. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics– Systems 43:266–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Song J, Leng M (2012) Analysis of the single-period problem under carbon emission policies. In: Choi TM (ed) Handbook of newsvendor problems: models, extensions and applications. Springer, New York, pp. 297–314

  18. Sundarakani B, de Souza R, Goh M, Wagner SM, Manikandan S (2010) Modeling carbon footprints across the supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 128:43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Whang SJ (2009) Markdown competition. In: N Aggrawal and SA Smith (eds) Retail supply chain management. Springer, Boston, pp. 1–15

  20. Bhattacharya R, Bandyopadhyay S (2011) A review of the causes of bullwhip effect in a supply chain. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54:1245–1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cachon GP (2001) Supply chain coordination with contracts. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania

  22. Chiu CH, Choi TM, Tang CS (2011) Price, rebate, and returns supply contracts for coordinating supply chains with price dependent demand. Prod Oper Manag 20:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yin R, Aviv Y, Pazgal A, Tang CS (2009) Optimal markdown pricing: implications of inventory display formats in the presence of strategic customers. Manag Sci 55:1391–1408

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Marks and Spencer’s Plan A Report: URL: http://plana.marksandspencer.com/media/pdf/how_we-do_business_report_2011.pdf. Accessed 4 Mar 2013.

  25. Kenny T, Gray NF (2009) Comparative performance of six carbon footprint models for use in Ireland. Environ Impact Assess Rev 29:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Choi TM (2013) Game theoretic analysis of a multi-period fashion supply chain with a risk averse retailer. International Journal of Inventory Research (in press)

  27. Weber CL, Matthews HS (2008) Quantifying the global and distributional aspects of American household carbon footprint. Ecol Econ 66:379–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bocken NMP, Allwood JM (2012) Strategies to reduce the carbon footprint of consumer goods by influencing stakeholders. J Clean Prod 35:118–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fan J, Guo X, Marinova D, Wu Y, Zhao D (2012) Embedded carbon footprint of Chinese urban households: structure and changes. J Clean Prod 33:50–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rizet C, Browne M, Cornelis E, Leonardi J (2012) Assessing carbon footprint and energy efficiency in competing supply chains: review—case studies and benchmarking. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 17:293–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsan-Ming Choi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choi, TM. Carbon footprint tax on fashion supply chain systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68, 835–847 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4947-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4947-4

Keywords

Navigation