Skip to main content
Log in

Upper limits of the estimated incapability index: a practical application on the reliability assessment of printed circuit boards

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Upper confidence limits are derived for the incapability index. Useful maximum values of the estimated incapability index required to ensure the process reaches a certain desirable level of time are also tabulated. A practical example is provided to illustrate how the results may be applied. The proposed results, which are more general than those as derived in earlier studies will facilitate process monitoring and reliability evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kane VE (1986) Process capability indices. J Qual Technol 18:41–52

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pearn WL, Lin GH, Chen KS (1998) Distributional and inferential properties of the process accuracy and process precision indices. Commun Stat Theory Methods 27:985–1000

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyles RA (1991) The Taguchi capability index. J Qual Technol 23:17–26

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chou YM, Owen DB (1989) On the distributions of the estimated process capability indices. Communi Stat Theory Methods 18:4549–4560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kotz S, Pearn WL, Johnson NL (1993) Some process capability indices are more reliable than one might think. Appl Stat 42:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin GH, Pearn WL (2004) On the distributional properties of the estimated process accuracy index Ca. Int J Ind Eng, accepted, Qual Technol 24:221–215

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pearn WL, Kotz S, Johnson NL (1992) Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices. J Qual Technol 24:216–231

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chan LK, Cheng SW, Spiring FA (1998) A new measure of process capability: Cpm. J Qual Technol 20:162–175

    Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson T (1992) The relationship of Cpm to squared error loss. J

  10. Greenwich M, Jahr-Schaffrath BL (1995) A process incapability index. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 12:58–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pearn WL, Lin GH (2001) On the reliability of the estimated process incapability index. Qual Reliab Eng Int 17:279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pearn WL, Lin GH. Estimated incapability index: Reliability and decision making with sample information. Qual Reliab Eng Int 18:141–147

  13. Lin GH (2002) Process incapability index for contaminated normal processes. Adv Appl Stat 2:119–130

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen KS (1998) Incapability index with asymmetric tolerances. Stat Sinica 8:253–262

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lin PC, Pearn WL, Chen KS (2001) Distributional properties and implications of the estimated process incapability index \(\hat{\mathrm{C}}{}_{\mathrm{pp}}^{\prime\prime}\). Am J Math Manage Sci 23:1–18

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gu Hong Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, G. Upper limits of the estimated incapability index: a practical application on the reliability assessment of printed circuit boards. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 24, 841–846 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1795-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1795-7

Keywords

Navigation