Abstract
The “flypaper effect”, when an unconditional lump-sum grant to a local government increases spending in a greater proportion than an equivalent raise in local income, has been extensively documented in the literature. This paper shows new estimates in the presence of spatial dependence, when local spending is not independent from its neighbor jurisdictions’ behavior. Using county-level data for Buenos Aires (Argentina), this study shows that while the “flypaper effect still holds true in the presence of spillover effects or mimic behavior across jurisdictions, it could be overestimated in the presence of spatial interdependence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anselin L, Bera A (1998) Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In: Ullah A, Giles D (eds.) Handbook of applied economic statistics, pp 237–290
Anselin L, Bera A, Florax R, Yoon M (1996) Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Reg Sci Urban Econ 26: 77–104. doi:10.1016/0166-0462(95)02111-6
Bae S, Feiock R (2004) The flypaper effect revisited: intergovernmental grants and local governance. Int J Public Adm 27: 577–596. doi:10.1081/PAD-120030256
Bailey S, Connolly S (1998) The flypaper effect: identifying areas for future research. Public Choice 95: 335–361. doi:10.1023/A:1005053921709
Besley T, Case A (1995) Incumbent behavior: vote seeking, tax-setting, and yardstick competition. Am Econ Rev 85: 25–45
Boarnet M, Glazer A (2002) Federal grants and yardstick competition. J Urban Econ 52: 53–64. doi:10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00001-3
Bordignon M, Cerniglia F, Revelli F (2003) In search of yardstick competition: a spatial analysis of Italian municipality property tax setting. J Urban Econ 54: 199–217. doi:10.1016/S0094-1190(03)00062-7
Bowman J (1974) Tax exportability, intergovernmental aid, and school finance reform. Natl Tax J 27: 163–173
Bradford D, Oates W (1971) Towards a predictive theory of intergovernmental grants. Am Econ Rev 61: 440–448
Brueckner J (1998) Testing for strategic interaction among local governments: the case of growth controls. J Urban Econ 44: 438–467. doi:10.1006/juec.1997.2078
Brueckner J (2003) Strategic interaction among governments: an overview of empirical studies. Int Reg Sci Rev 26: 175–188. doi:10.1177/0160017602250974
Brueckner J, Saavedra L (2001) Do local governments engage in strategic property-tax competition. Natl Tax J 54: 203–229
Buettner T (2003) Tax base effects and fiscal externalities on local capital taxation: evidence from a panel of German jurisdictions. J Urban Econ 54: 110–128. doi:10.1016/S0094-1190(03)00039-1
Case A, Rosen H, Hines J (1993) Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: evidence from the States. J Public Econ 52: 285–307. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(93)90036-S
Conley T (1999) GMM estimation with cross sectional dependence. J Econom 92: 1–45. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00084-0
Dougan W, Kenyon D (1988) Pressure groups and public expenditures: the flypaper effect reconsidered. Econ Inq 26: 159–170
Feldstein M (1975) Wealth neutrality and local choice in public education. Am Econ Rev 65: 75–89
Fisher R (1982) Income and grant effects on local expenditures: the flypaper effect and other difficulties. J Urban Econ 12: 324–345. doi:10.1016/0094-1190(82)90021-3
Figlio D, Kolpin V, Reid W (1999) Do states play welfare games?. J Urban Econ 46: 437–454. doi:10.1006/juec.1999.2131
Gamkhar S, Oates W (1996) Asymmetries in the response to increases and decreases in intergovernmental grants: Some empirical findings. Natl Tax J 49: 501–512
Gramlich E (1977) A review of the theory of intergovernmental grants. In: Oates W (ed) The political economy of fiscal federalism. Heath, Lexington
Gramlich E (1987) Federalism and federal deficit reduction. Natl Tax J 40: 299–313
Gramlich E, Galper H (1973) State and local fiscal behavior and federal grant policy. Brookings Pap Econ Act 1: 15–58. doi:10.2307/2534084
Hamilton B (1983) The flypaper effect and other anomalies. J Public Econ 22: 347–361. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(83)90040-3
Hamilton B (1986) The flypaper effect and the deadweight loss from taxation. J Urban Econ 19: 148–155. doi:10.1016/0094-1190(86)90036-7
Heyndels B (2001) Asymmetries in the flypaper effect: empirical evidence for the Flemish municipalities. Appl Econ 33: 1329–1334. doi:10.1080/00036840010004536
Hines J, Thaler R (1995) Anomalies: the flypaper effect. J Econ Perspect 9: 217–226
Levaggi R, Zanola R (2003) Flypaper effect and sluggishness: evidence from regional health expenditure in Italy. Int Tax Public Finance 10: 535–547. doi:10.1023/A:1026118222901
Megdal S (1987) The flypaper effect revisited: an econometric explanation. Rev Econ Stat 69: 347–351. doi:10.2307/1927243
Moffitt R (1984) The effects of grants-in-aid on state and local expenditures. J Public Econ 23: 279–305. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(84)90032-X
Moran P (1950) A test for the serial independence of residuals. Biometrika 35: 178–181
Oates W (1979) Lump-sum grants have price effects. In Mieszkowski P, Oakland W (eds) Fiscal federalism and grants-in-aid. The Urban Institute, Washington
Olmsted G, Denzau A, Roberts J (1993) We voted for this? institutions and educational spending. J Public Econ 52: 363–376. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(93)90040-Z
Ponce C (1997) Determinantes del gasto público local: Teoría y evidencia empírica para las municipalidades de la Provincia de Córdoba, Anales de la Asociación Argentina de Economía Política
Revelli F (2001) Spatial patterns in local taxation: tax mimicking or error mimicking?. Appl Econ 33: 1101–1107. doi:10.1080/00036840010007164
Saavedra L (2000) A model of welfare competition with evidence from AFDC. J Urban Econ 47: 248–279. doi:10.1006/juec.1999.2141
Schneider M, Ji B (1987) The flypaper effect and competition in the local market fro public goods. Public Choice 54: 27–39. doi:10.1007/BF00123803
Stine W (1994) Is local government revenue response to federal aid symmetrical? Evidence from Pennsylvania county governments in an era of retrenchment. Natl Tax J 57: 799–816
Strumpf K (1998) A predictive index for the flypaper effect. J Public Econ 69: 389–412. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00008-5
Turnbull G (1992) Fiscal illusion, uncertainty, and the flypaper effect. J Public Econ 48: 207–223. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(92)90027-D
Weicher J (1972) Aid, expenditures, and local government structure. Natl Tax J 25: 573–583
Worthington A, Dollery B (1999) Fiscal illusion and the Australian local government grass process: how sticky is the flypaper effect?. Public Choice 99: 1–13. doi:10.1023/A:1018329802757
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Acosta, P. The “flypaper effect” in presence of spatial interdependence: evidence from Argentinean municipalities. Ann Reg Sci 44, 453–466 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0277-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0277-0