Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measurement of tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance: evaluation of inter- and intraobserver correlation dependent on the severity of trochlear dysplasia

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Excessive tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance (TT–TG) is considered as one of the major risk factors in patellofemoral instability (PFI). TT–TG characterises the lateralisation of the tibial tuberosity and the medialisation of the trochlear groove in the case of trochlear dysplasia. The aim of this study was to assess the inter- and intraobserver reliability of the measurement of TT–TG dependent on the grade of trochlear dysplasia.

Methods

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 99 consecutive knee joints were analysed retrospectively. Hereof, 61 knee joints presented with a history of PFI and 38 had no symptoms of PFI. After synopsis of the axial MRI scans with true lateral radiographs of the knee, the 61 knees presenting with PFI were assessed in terms of trochlear dysplasia. The knees were distributed according to the four-type classification system described by Dejour.

Results

Regarding interobserver correlation for the measurements of TT–TG in trochlear dysplasia, we found r = 0.89 (type A), r = 0.90 (type B), r = 0.74 (type C) and 0.62 (type D) for Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Regarding intraobserver correlation, we calculated r = 0.89 (type A), r = 0.91 (type B), r = 0.77 (type C) and r = 0.71 (type D), respectively. Pearson’s correlation coefficient for the measurement of TT–TG in normal knees resulted in r = 0.87 for interobserver correlation and r = 0.90 for intraobserver correlation.

Conclusion

Decreasing inter- and intraobserver correlation for the measurement of TT–TG with increasing severity of trochlear dysplasia was detected. In our opinion, the measurement of TT–TG is of significance in low-grade trochlear dysplasia. The final decision to perform a distal realignment procedure based on a pathological TT–TG in the presence of high-grade trochlear dysplasia should be reassessed properly.

Level of evidence

Retrospective study, Level II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alemparte J, Ekdahl M, Burnier L, Hernandez R, Cardemil A, Cielo R, Danilla S (2000) Patellofemoral evaluation with radiographs and computed tomography scans in 60 knees of asymptomatic subjects. Arthroscopy 23(2):170–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Camp CL, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ, Levy BA, Bond JR, Collins MS, Dahm DL (2013) CT and MRI measurements of tibial tubercule-trochlear groove distances are not equivalent in patients with patellar instability. Am J Sports Med 41(8):1835–1840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dejour D, Saggin P (2010) The sulcus deepening trochleoplasty—the Lyon’s procedure. Int Orthop 34(2):311–316

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Dejour H, Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Guier CH (1994) Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2:19–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dietrich TJ, Betz M, Pfirrmann CW, Koch PP, Fucentese SF (2014) End-stage extension and its influence on the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance (TT–TG) in asymptomatic volunteers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(1):214–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Howells NR, Barnett AJ, Ahearn N, Ansari A, Eldrige JD (2012) Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. A prospective outcome assessment of a large single centre series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94(12):1655–1659

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Koeter S, Diks MJF, Anderson PG, Wymenga AB (2007) A modified tibial tubercle osteotomy for patellar maltracking. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(2):180–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McNally EG, Osterle SJ, Pal C (2000) Assessment of patellar maltracking using combined static and dynamic MRI. Eur Radiol 10:1051–1055

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Monk AP, Doll HA Gibbons CLMH, Osterle S, Beard DJ, Gill HD, Murray DW (2011). The patho-anatomy of patellofemoral subluxation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93-B:1341–1347

  10. Nelitz M, Lippacher S, Reichel H, Dornacher D (2014) Evaluation of trochlear dysplasia using MRI: correlation between the classification system of Dejour and objective parameters of trochlear dysplasia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(1):120–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pandit S, Frampton C, Stoddart J, Lynskey T (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance: normal values for males and females. Int Orthop 35(12):1799–1803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pfirrmann CW, Zanetti M, Romero J, Hodler J (2000) Femoral trochlear dysplasia: MR findings. Radiology 216(3):858–864

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schoettle PB, Zanetti M, Seifert B, Pfirrmann CW, Fucentese SF, Romero J (2006) The tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance; a comparative study between CT and MRI scanning. Knee 13(1):26–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stäubli HU, Dürrenmatt U, Porcellini B, Rauschning W (1999) Anatomy and surface geometry of the patellofemoral joint in the axial plane. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81(3):452–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tecklenburg K, Feller JA, Whitehead TS, Webster KE, Elzarka A (2010) Outcome of surgery for recurrent patellar dislocation based on the distance of the tibial tuberosity to the trochlear groove. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(10):1376–1380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wittstein JR, Bartlett EC, Easterbrook J, Byrd JC (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of patellofemoral malalignment. Arthroscopy 22(6):643–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedics, University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany

    Daniel Dornacher, Heiko Reichel & Sabine Lippacher

Authors
  1. Daniel Dornacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heiko Reichel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sabine Lippacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Dornacher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dornacher, D., Reichel, H. & Lippacher, S. Measurement of tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance: evaluation of inter- and intraobserver correlation dependent on the severity of trochlear dysplasia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22, 2382–2387 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3083-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3083-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation