Skip to main content
Log in

Difference in knee rotation between total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties during stair climbing

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare knee kinematics during stair walking in patients with simultaneous total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA). It was hypothesized that UKA would reproduce more normalized knee kinematics than TKA during stair ascent and descent.

Methods

Six patients who received UKA in one knee and TKA in the other knee were included in the study. For this study, a four-step staircase was assembled with two force platforms being positioned at the centre of the second and third steps. Each patient was attached with 16 reflective markers at both lower extremities and was asked to perform five roundtrip trials of stair climbing. Kinematic parameters including stance duration, knee angle, vertical ground reaction force (GRF), joint reaction force, and moments were obtained and analysed using a10-camera motion system (VICON, Oxford, UK). Nonparametric Friedman test was used to compare the results between two arthroplasty methods and between stair ascent and descent.

Results

Compared to TKA, UKA knees exhibited significantly greater degree of rotation in transverse planes (5.0 degrees during ascent and 6.0 degrees during descent on average), but showed no difference in terms of the other parameters. When comparing the results during stair ascent with descent, overall greater knee angle, vertical GRF, joint reaction force, and moment were observed during stair descent.

Conclusions

Both UKA and TKA knees have shown overall similar knee kinematics, though UKA knee may allow greater degree of rotation freedom, which resembles normal knee kinematics during stair walking.

Level of evidence

Case–control study, Level III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andriacchi TP, Galante JO, Fermier RW (1982) The influence of total knee-replacement design on walking and stair-climbing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:1328–1335

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barker KL, Jenkins C, Pandit H, Murray D (2012) Muscle power and function two years after unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 19:360–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berti L, Benedetti MG, Ensini A, Catani F, Giannini S (2006) Clinical and biomechanical assessment of patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 21:610–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bolanos AA, Colizza WA, McCann PD, Gotlin RS, Wootten ME, Kahn BA, Insall JN (1998) A comparison of isokinetic strength testing and gait analysis in patients with posterior cruciate-retaining and substituting knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplast 13:906–915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Borden LS, Perry JE, Davis BL, Owings TM, Grabiner MD (1999) A biomechanical evaluation of one-stage vs two-stage bilateral knee arthroplasty patients. Gait Posture 9:24–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Catani F, Belvedere C, Ensini A, Feliciangeli A, Giannini S, Leardini A (2011) In-vivo knee kinematics in rotationally unconstrained total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 29:1484–1490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Catani F, Benedetti MG, Bianchi L, Marchionni V, Giannini S, Leardini A (2012) Muscle activity around the knee and gait performance in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty patients: a comparative study on fixed- and mobile-bearing designs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1042–1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Catani F, Benedetti MG, De Felice R, Buzzi R, Giannini S, Aglietti P (2003) Mobile and fixed bearing total knee prosthesis functional comparison during stair climbing. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 18:410–418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chassin EP, Mikosz RP, Andriacchi TP, Rosenberg AG (1996) Functional analysis of cemented medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 11:553–559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Choy W-S, Kim H-Y, Kim K-J, Kam B-S (2007) A comparison of gait analysis after total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the same patient. J Korean Orthop Assoc 42:505–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Costigan PA, Deluzio KJ, Wyss UP (2002) Knee and hip kinetics during normal stair climbing. Gait Posture 16:31–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Draganich LF, Whitehurst JB, Chou LS, Piotrowski GA, Pottenger LA, Finn HA (1999) The effects of the rotating-hinge total knee replacement on gait and stair stepping. J Arthroplast 14:743–755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fantozzi S, Benedetti MG, Leardini A, Banks SA, Cappello A, Assirelli D, Catani F (2003) Fluoroscopic and gait analysis of the functional performance in stair ascent of two total knee replacement designs. Gait Posture 17:225–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grood ES, Suntay WJ (1983) A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 105:136–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hatfield GL, Hubley-Kozey CL, Astephen Wilson JL, Dunbar MJ (2011) The effect of total knee arthroplasty on knee joint kinematics and kinetics during gait. J Arthroplast 26:309–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hsue BJ, Su FC (2009) Gait and kinematics of the trunk and lower extremities in stair ascent using quadricane in healthy subjects. Gait Posture 29:146–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kowalk DL, Duncan JA, Vaughan CL (1996) Abduction-adduction moments at the knee during stair ascent and descent. J Biomech 29:383–388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC (1991) Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273:151–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Walter CA, Aziz-Jacobo J, Cheney NA (2009) Is recovery faster for mobile-bearing unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1450–1457

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McClelland JA, Webster KE, Feller JA, Menz HB (2011) Knee kinematics during walking at different speeds in people who have undergone total knee replacement. Knee 18:151–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA (1998) Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:862–865

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Orishimo KF, Kremenic IJ, Deshmukh AJ, Nicholas SJ, Rodriguez JA (2012) Does total knee arthroplasty change frontal plane knee biomechanics during gait? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:1171–1176

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Patil S, Colwell CW Jr, Ezzet KA, D’Lima DD (2005) Can normal knee kinematics be restored with unicompartmental knee replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:332–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reid SM, Lynn SK, Musselman RP, Costigan PA (2007) Knee biomechanics of alternate stair ambulation patterns. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:2005–2011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Riener R, Rabuffetti M, Frigo C (2002) Stair ascent and descent at different inclinations. Gait Posture 15:32–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Saccomanni B (2010) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review of literature. Clin Rheumatol 29:339–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stacoff A, Kramers-de Quervain IA, Luder G, List R, Stussi E (2007) Ground reaction forces on stairs. Part II: knee implant patients versus normals. Gait Posture 26:48–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Weinstein JN, Andriacchi TP, Galante J (1986) Factors influencing walking and stairclimbing following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 1:109–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wilson SA, McCann PD, Gotlin RS, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME, Insall JN (1996) Comprehensive gait analysis in posterior-stabilized knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 11:359–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini A, Rosenbaum D, Whittle M, D’Lima DD, Cristofolini L, Witte H, Schmid O, Stokes I (2002) ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion–part I: ankle, hip, and spine. Int Soc Biomech J Biomech 35:543–548

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant of the Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (A091120) and was supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2011-0019730).

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byoung-Hyun Min.

Additional information

Myung-Chul Jung and Jun Young Chung have contributed equally as the first author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jung, MC., Chung, J.Y., Son, KH. et al. Difference in knee rotation between total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties during stair climbing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22, 1879–1886 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3064-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3064-8

Keywords

Navigation