Skip to main content
Log in

The accuracy of bone tunnel position using fluoroscopic-based navigation system in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The first purpose of this study was to examine whether fluoroscopic-based navigation system contributes to the accuracy and reproducibility of the bone tunnel placements in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The second purpose was to investigate the application of the navigation system for double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Methods

A hospital-based case–control study was conducted, including a consecutive series of 55 patients. In 37 patients who received single-bundle ACL reconstruction, surgeries were performed with this system for 19 knees (group 1) and without this system for 18 knees (group 2). The positioning of the femoral and tibial tunnels was evaluated by plain sagittal radiographs. In 18 patients who received double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the navigation system (group 3), the bone tunnel positions were assessed by three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). Clinical assessment of all patients was followed with the use of Lysholm Knees Score and IKDC.

Results

Taking 0% as the anterior and 100% as the posterior extent, the femoral tunnels were 74.9 ± 3.0% in group 1 and 71.5 ± 5.8% in group 2 along Blumensaat’s line, and the tibial tunnels were 42.3 ± 1.4% in group 1 and 42.5 ± 4.6% in group 2 along the tibia plateau. The bone tunnel positions in group 1 were located significantly closer to the position planned preoperatively and varied less in both femur and tibial side, compared with those without navigation (group 2). (Femur: P < 0.05, Tibia: P < 0.001) 3D-CT evaluation of double-bundle ACL reconstruction (group 3) also demonstrated that the bone tunnel positions of both anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) were placed as we expected.

Conclusion

The fluoroscopic-based navigation system contributed to the more reproducible placement of the bone tunnel during single-bundle ACL reconstruction compared with conventional technique. Additionally, this device was also useful for double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Level of evidence

Case–control study, Therapeutic study, Level III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Giron F, Losco M, Cuomo P, Ciardullo A, Mondanelli N (2010) Comparison between single-and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 38:25–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Almekinders LC, Chiavetta J (2001) Tibial subluxation in anterior ligament-deficient knees: implications for tibial tunnel placement. Arthroscopy 17:960–962

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Amis AA, Jakob RP (1998) Anterior cruciate ligament graft positioning, tensioning and twisting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6(Suppl 1):S2–S12

    Google Scholar 

  4. Behrend H, Stutz G, Kessler MA, Rukavina A, Giesinger K, Kuster MS (2006) Tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: quality control in a teaching hospital. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1159–1165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T (1997) Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg 10:14–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bicer EK, Lustig S, Servien E, Selmi TA, Neyret P (2010) Current knowledge in the anatomy of the human anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1075–1084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burkart A, Debski RE, McMahon PJ (2001) Precision of ACL tunnel placement using traditional and robotic techniques. Comput Aided Surg 6:270–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng T, Liu T, Zhang G, Zhang X (2011) Computer-navigated surgery in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: are radiographic outcomes better than conventional surgery? Arthroscopy 27:97–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG et al (2007) G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Foley KT, Simon DA, Rampersaud YR (2001) Virtual fluoroscopy: computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation. Spine 26:347–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fu FH, Jordan SS (2007) The lateral intercondylar ridge-a key to anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2103–2104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Halbrecht J, Levy IM (1993) Fluoroscopic assist in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 9:533–535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hantes ME, Liantsis AK, Basdekis GK, Karantanas AH, Christel P, Malizos KN (2010) Evaluation of the bone bridge between the bone tunnels after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multidetector computed tomography study. Am J Sports Med 38:1618–1625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hart R, Krejzla J, Svab P, Kocis J, Stipcak V (2008) Outcomes after conventional versus computer-navigated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24:569–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Howell SM, Taylor MA (1993) Failure of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament due to impingement by the intercondylar roof. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:1044–1055

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Iriuchishima T, Ingham SJ, Tajima G, Horaguchi T, Saito A, Tokuhashi Y, Van Houten AH, Aerts MM, Fu FH (2010) Evaluation of the tunnel placement in the anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1226–1231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Fukuda A, Tsukada H, Toh S (2006) Future of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: incorporation of ACL anatomic data into the navigation system. Orthopedics 29:S108–S112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jaureguito JW, Paulos LE (1996) Why grafts fail. Clin Orthop Relat Res 325:25–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kasten P, Szczodry M, Irrgang J, Kropf E, Costello J, Fu FH (2010) What is the role of intra-operative fluoroscopic measurement to determine tibial tunnel placement in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1169–1175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kamath GV, Redfern JC, Greis PE, Burks RT (2011) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 39:199–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Khadem R, Yeh CC, Sadeghi-Tehrani M (2000) Comparative tracking error analysis of five different optical tracking systems. Comput Aided Surg 5:98–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Khalfayan EE, Sharkey PF, Alexander AH, Bruckner JD, Bynum EB (1996) The relationship between tunnel placement and clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 24:335–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Klos TV, Habets RJ, Banks AZ, Banks SA, Devilee RJ, Cook FF (1998) Computer assistance in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:65–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lane CG, Warren RF, Stanford FC, Kendoff D, Pearle AD (2008) In vivo analysis of the pivot shift phenomenon during computer navigated ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:487–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nakagawa T, Hiraoka H, Fukuda A (2007) Fluoroscopic-based navigation-assisted placement of the tibial tunnel in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 23:441–444

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nakagawa T, Takeda H, Nakajima K (2008) Intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging-based navigation-assisted anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24:1161–1167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pietrini SD, Ziegler CG, Anderson CJ, Wijdicks CA, Westerhaus BD, Johansen S, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF (2011) Radiographic landmarks for tunnel positioning in double bundle ACL reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:792–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Plaweski S, Cazal J, Rosell P, Merloz P (2006) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using navigation: a comparative study on 60 patients. Am J Sports Med 34:542–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Purnell ML, Larson AI, Clancy W (2008) Anterior cruciate ligament insertions on the tibia and femur and their relationships to critical bony landmarks using high-resolution volume-rendering computed tomography. Am J Sports Med 36:2083–2090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Seon JK, Gadikota HR, Wu JL, Sutton K, Gill TJ, Li G (2010) Comparison of single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in restoration of knee kinematics and anterior cruciate ligament forces. Am J Sports Med 38:1359–1367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shino K, Suzuki T, Iwahashi T (2010) The resident’s ridge as an arthroscopic landmark for anatomical femoral tunnel drilling in ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1164–1168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Snow M, Stanish WD (2010) Double-bundle ACL reconstruction: how big is the learning curve? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1195–1200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Song EK, Seon JK, Park SJ, Hur CI, Lee DS (2009) In vivo laxity of stable versus anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees using a navigation system: a comparative study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:941–945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Staubli HU, Rauschning W (1994) Tibial attachment area of the anterior cruciate ligament in the extended knee position. Anatomy and cryosections in vitro complemented by magnetic resonance arthrography in vivo. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2:138–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Taketomi S, Nakagawa T, Takeda H, Nakajima K, Nakayama S, Fukai A, Hirota J, Kachi Y, Kawano H, Miura T, Fukiu N, Nakamura K (2011) Anatomical placement of double femoral tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anteromedial tunnel first or posterolateral tunnel first? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:424–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tensho K, Kodaira H, Yasuda G, Yoshimura Y, Narita N, Morioka S, Kato H, Saito N (2011) Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using CT-based navigation and fiducial markers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:378–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Topliss C, Webb J (2001) An audit of tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 8:59–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Tsukada H, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Fukuda A, Toh S (2008) Anatomical analysis of the anterior cruciate ligament femoral and tibial footprints. J Orthop Sci 13:122–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Vergis A, Gillquist J (1995) Graft failure in intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a review of the literature. Arthroscopy 11:312–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Voos JE, Musahl V, Maak TG, Wickiewicz TL, Peale AD (2010) Comparison of tunnel positions in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using computer navigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1282–1289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zantop T, Wellmann M, Fu FH, Petersen W (2008) Tunnel positioning of anteromedial and posterolateral bundles in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anatomic and radiographic findings. Am J Sports Med 36:65–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ms. Janina Tubby and Mr. Daniel Gilpin for help in preparing the manuscript. No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article, nor have any funds been received in support of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yohei Kawakami or Takafumi Hiranaka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kawakami, Y., Hiranaka, T., Matsumoto, T. et al. The accuracy of bone tunnel position using fluoroscopic-based navigation system in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20, 1503–1510 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1726-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1726-3

Keywords

Navigation