Skip to main content
Log in

Triple-bundle ACL grafts evaluated by second-look arthroscopy

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the morphology of transplanted triple-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts by second-look arthroscopy.

Methods

The subjects were 41 patients with a mean age of 25.5 ± 8.5 years who underwent second-look arthroscopy at between 6 and 22 months after the anatomical triple-bundle ACL reconstruction using semitendinosus tendon autograft. Lachman test was negative in 38 knees and mildly positive with a firm endpoint in 3 knees. Arthroscopic evaluation of grafts was performed for the anteromedial graft (AM), the intermediate graft (IM), and the posterolateral graft (PL), focusing on tension and graft damage.

Results

All grafts showed “fan-out” shape approaching the tibial attachment, which looked closer to the natural ACL compared to the double-bundle grafts. As to graft tension, 93% of AM, 90% of IM, and 88% of PL grafts were evaluated as taut, respectively. As to graft damage, there was no apparent rupture in the AM and IM grafts, while complete or substantial rupture was observed in 10% of PL grafts around the femoral tunnel aperture. The incidence of graft rupture in PL grafts was significantly greater than those in the AM and IM grafts. As to synovial coverage, 76% of AM, 78% of IM, and 59% of PL grafts were evaluated as “Good,” while 41% of PL grafts were not fully covered with synovium. All of the synovial defects were observed around the femoral tunnel aperture.

Conclusion

The morphology of the triple-bundle grafts resembled that of the natural ACL, while complete or substantial rupture was observed in 10% of the PL grafts.

Level of evidence

Study of case series with no comparison group, Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amis AA, Dawkins GP (1991) Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Fibre bundle actions related to ligament replacements and injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:260–267

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnoczky SP (1983) Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 172:19–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Danylchuk KD, Finlay JB, Krcek JP (1978) Microstructural organization of human and bovine cruciate ligaments. Clin Orthop Relat Res 131:294–298

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Giron F, Aglietti P, Cuomo P, Mondanelli N, Ciardullo A (2005) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft directly fixed to cortical bone: 5 year results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:81–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gohil S, Annear PO, Breidahl W (2007) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous double hamstrings: a comparison of standard versus minimal debridement techniques using MRI to assess revascularisation. A randomised prospective study with a one-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1165–1171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamada M, Shino K, Horibe S, Mitsuoka T, Miyama T, Shiozaki Y, Mae T (2001) Single- versus bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous multiple-stranded hamstring tendons with endo Button femoral fixation: a prospective study. Arthroscopy 17:801–807

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Höher J, Livesay GA, Ma CB, Withrow JD, Fu FH, Woo SL (1999) Hamstring graft motion in the femoral bone tunnel when using titanium button/polyester tape fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:215–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Howell SM, Clark JA, Blasier RD (1991) Serial magnetic resonance imaging of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament autografts during the first year of implantation. A preliminary study. Am J Sports Med 19:42–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Iwahashi T, Shino K, Nakata K, Nakamura N, Yamada Y, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K (2008) Assessment of the “functional length” of the three bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:167–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kinugasa K, Mae T, Matsumoto N, Nakagawa S, Yoneda M, Shino K (2011) Effect of patient age on morphology of anterior cruciate ligament grafts at second-look arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 27:38–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee JH, Bae DK, Song SJ, Cho SM, Yoon KH (2010) Comparison of clinical results and second-look arthroscopy findings after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3 different types of grafts. Arthroscopy 26:41–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. L’Insalata JC, Klatt B, Fu FH, Harner CD (1997) Tunnel expansion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:234–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mae T, Shino K, Matsumoto N, Hamada M, Yoneda M, Nakata K (2007) Anatomical two-bundle versus Rosenberg’s isometric bi-socket ACL reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison in laxity match pretension. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:328–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Maeda A, Shino K, Horibe S, Nakata K, Buccafusca G (1996) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with multistranded autogenous semitendinosus tendon. Am J Sports Med 24:504–509

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Muneta T, Koga H, Mochizuki T, Ju YJ, Hara K, Nimura A, Yagishita K, Sekiya I (2007) A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double-bundle techniques. Arthroscopy 23:618–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Natsu-ume T, Shino K, Nakata K, Nakamura N, Toritsuka Y, Mae T (2001) Endoscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with quadrupled hamstring tendons. A correlation between MRI changes and restored stability of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:834–837

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Norwood LA, Cross MJ (1979) Anterior cruciate ligament: functional anatomy of its bundles in rotatory instabilities. Am J Sports Med 7:23–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Otsubo H, Shino K, Nakamura N, Nakata K, Nakagawa S, Koyanagi M (2007) Arthroscopic evaluation of ACL grafts reconstructed with the anatomical two-bundle technique using hamstring tendon autograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:720–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Samuelsson K, Andersson D, Karlsson J (2009) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries with special reference to graft type and surgical technique: an assessment of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy 25:1139–1174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sastre S, Popescu D, Núñez M, Pomes J, Tomas X, Peidro L (2010) Double-bundle versus single-bundle ACL reconstruction using the horizontal femoral position: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:32–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Segawa H, Koga Y, Omori G, Sakamoto M, Hara T (2005) Contact pressure in anterior cruciate ligament bone tunnels: comparison of endoscopic and two-incision technique. Arthroscopy 21:439–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shino K, Mae T, Maeda A, Miyama T, Shinjo H, Kawakami H (2002) Graft fixation with predetermined tension using a new device, the double spike plate. Arthroscopy 18:908–911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shino K, Nakata K, Nakamura N, Mae T, Ohtsubo H, Iwahashi T, Nakagawa S (2005) Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using two double-looped hamstring tendon grafts via twin femoral and triple tibial tunnels. Oper Tech Orthop 15:130–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith BA, Livesay GA, Woo SL (1993) Biology and biomechanics of the anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Sports Med 12:637–670

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Toritsuka Y, Shino K, Horibe S, Mitsuoka T, Hamada M, Nakata K, Nakamura N, Yoshikawa H (2004) Second-look arthroscopy of anterior cruciate ligament grafts with multistranded hamstring tendons. Arthroscopy 20:287–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, Debski RE, Fu FH, Woo SL (2002) Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30:660–666

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshinari Tanaka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tanaka, Y., Shino, K., Horibe, S. et al. Triple-bundle ACL grafts evaluated by second-look arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20, 95–101 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1551-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1551-8

Keywords

Navigation