Skip to main content
Log in

Two-year outcomes following ACL reconstruction with allograft tibialis anterior tendons: a retrospective study

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

The outcomes of 18 patients (11 females, 7 males; age, 40.4±11 years) at 2 years after ACL reconstruction with cryopreserved tibialis anterior allografts using a double bundle technique are presented. Most subjects (72%) described themselves as being moderately active before surgery. After providing written informed consent, subjects completed the 2000 IKDC Knee Form, underwent arthrometric knee measurements, and performed one-leg hop and isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring torque tests (60°/s). Ninety-four percent (17/18) of the subjects had normal or near-normal grades for manual knee ligament tests. Knee arthrometry measurements revealed a mean 1.1-mm involved side increase at 134 N (8.9±2 mm vs 7.8±3 mm) and a 2-mm involved side increase during manual maximum testing (11.3±2 mm vs 9.3±3 mm). Group means revealed active knee flexion (136±8° vs 139±6°) and knee hyper-extension (3±2° vs 5±2°), which were slightly reduced at the involved knee. One-leg hop testing revealed a 15% mean deficit at the involved side (0.81±0.3 m vs 0.95±0.3 m). Isokinetic testing revealed an 11% mean deficit at the involved side (143.4±60 Nm vs 161.8±54 Nm) for the quadriceps and 7% greater strength at the involved side (105.9±35 Nm vs 98.8±35 Nm) for the hamstrings. Side-to-side comparisons revealed that many patients displayed less than normal quadriceps femoris torque (72%, 13/18), hamstring torque (28%, 5/18) and hop test (28%, 5/18) performance. Moderate positive correlations existed between involved side quadriceps (r=0.80) and hamstring (r=0.83) torque/bodyweight and hop test performance. Scores were 77.6±21 (range 28.7–100) and 78.1±16 (range 41.7–100) for the 2000 IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation and Health Assessment forms. Most subjects (83%, 15/18) rated their current function at ≥91% of pre-injury levels and all subjects continued to participate at their pre-injury perceived activity level. At 2 years after ACL reconstruction with tibialis anterior allografts, this subject group displayed satisfactory functional outcomes. Tibialis anterior allograft use provides an effective ACL reconstruction alternative, particularly for older individuals who want to continue recreational sports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anonymous (2001) Update: Unexplained deaths following knee surgery—Minnesota, 2001. MMWR 50:1080

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aune AK, Holm I, Risberg MA, Jensen HK, Steen H (2001) Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft compared with patellar tendon-bone autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A randomized study with two-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 29:722–728

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrett GR, Noojin FK, Hartzog CW, Nash CR (2002) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in females: A comparison of hamstring versus patellar tendon autograft. Arthroscopy 18:46–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonatus TJ, Alexander AH (1991) Patellar fracture and avulsion of the patellar ligament complicating arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop Rev 20:770–774

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caborn DNM, Selby JB (2002) Allograft anterior tibialis tendon with bioabsorbable interference screw fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 18:102-105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Charlick DA, Caborn DNM (2000) Technical note: alternative soft-tissue graft preparation technique for cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 16:E20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper DE, Deng XH, Burstein AL, Warren RF (1993) The strength of the central third patellar tendon graft. a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 21:818–823

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. DuMontier TA, Metcalf MH, Simonian PT, Larson RV (2001) Patella fracture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the patellar tendon: a comparison between different shaped bone block excisions. Am J Knee Surg 14:9–15

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eriksson K, Anderberg P, Hamberg P, Lofgren AC, Bredenberg M, Westman I, Wredmark T (2001) A comparison of quadruple semitendinosus and patellar tendon grafts in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:348–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harris NL, Indelicato PA, Bloomberg MS, Meister K, Wheeler DL (2002) Radiographic and histologic analysis of the tibial tunnel after allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in goats. Am J Sports Med 30:368–373

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haut Donahue TL, Howell SM, Hull ML, Gregersen C (2002) A biomechanical evaluation of anterior and posterior tibialis tendons as suitable single-loop anterior cruciate ligament grafts. Arthroscopy 18:589–597

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Heimstra LA, Webber S, MacDonald PB, Kriellaars DJ (2000) Knee strength after hamstring tendon and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:1472–1479

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hollis JM, Pearsall AW IV, Stutuz JD, Russell GV (2001) The biomechanical properties of the tibialis anterior, tibialis posterior and peroneus longus tendons as potential graft sources. Orthop Trans 26, abstract 715

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jackson DW, Corsetti J, Simon T (1996) Biologic incorporation of allograft anterior cruciate ligament replacements. Clin Orthop Rel Res 324:126–133

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jomha NM, Pinczewski LA, Clingeleffer A, Otto DD (1999) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with patellar-tendon autograft and interference screw fixation: the results at seven years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:775–779

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kartus J, Movin T, Karlsson J (2001) Donor-site morbidity and anterior knee problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autografts. Arthroscopy 17:971–980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Keays SL, Bullock-Saxton J, Keays AC, Newcombe P (2001) Muscle strength and function before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis. Knee 8:229–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller MD, Nichols T, Butler CA (1999) Patella fracture and proximal tendon rupture following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 15:640–643

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moebius UG, Georgoulis AD, Papageorgiou CD, Papadonikolakis A, Rossis J, Soucacos PN (2001) Alterations of the extensor apparatus after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the medial third of the patellar tendon. Arthroscopy 17:953–959

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakamura N, Horibe S, Sasaki S, et al (2002) Evaluation of active knee flexion and hamstring strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Arthroscopy 18:598–602

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD (1996) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with human allograft. Comparison of early and later results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:524–537

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Petsche TS, Hutchinson MR (1999) Loss of extension after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 7:119–127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pinczewski LA, Clingeleffer AJ, Otto DD, Bonar SF, Corry IS (1997) Integration of hamstring tendon graft with bone in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 13:641–643

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pinczewski LA, Deehan DJ, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Clingeleffer A (2002) A five-year comparison of patellar tendon versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 30:523–536

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rodeo SA, Arnoczky SP, Torzilli PA, Hidaka C, Warren RF (1993) Tendon-healing in a bone tunnel. A biomechanical and histological study in the dog. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:1795-1803

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shino K, Inoue M, Horibe S, Hamada M, Ono K (1990) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using allogeneic tendon: long term follow up. Am J Sports Med 18:457–465

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shino K, Kimura T, Hirose H, Inoue M, Ono K (1986) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament by allogeneic tendon graft. An operation for chronic ligamentous insufficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68:739–746

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shino K, Nakagawa S, Inoue M, Horibe S, Yoneda M (1993) Deterioration of patello-femoral articular surfaces after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 21:206–211

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shino K, Oakes BW, Horibe S, Nakata K, Nakamura N (1995) Collagen fibril populations in human anterior cruciate ligament allografts. Am J Sports Med 23:203–209

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tomita F, Yasuda K, Mikami S, Sakai T, Yamazaki S, Tohyama H (2001) Comparisons of intraosseous graft healing between the doubled flexor tendon graft and the bone-patella tendon-bone graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 17:461–476

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Nyland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nyland, J., Caborn, D.N.M., Rothbauer, J. et al. Two-year outcomes following ACL reconstruction with allograft tibialis anterior tendons: a retrospective study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11, 212–218 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-003-0371-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-003-0371-x

Keywords

Navigation