Skip to main content
Log in

Surrogate measures to optimize structures for robust and predictable progressive failure

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optimizing complex structures for robust and predictable progressive failure using probabilistic approaches is computationally expensive. In this paper we investigate the progressive failure characteristics of structures subjected to random variability and deduce patterns to identify surrogate measures that correlate with robustness and predictability of the design’s progressive failure. The procedure is demonstrated for the optimization of robustness and predictability in progressive failure of truss structures. Deterministic optimization of trusses was used to generate candidate designs to compare and contrast robustness and predictability. The stochastic analyses of the candidate designs are then used to identify surrogate features that correlate to robustness and predictability of progressive failure response. These features are converted to numerical surrogate objectives or constraints and used in optimization to demonstrate their effectiveness and computational efficiency. The example shows that surrogate measures can be developed for robustness and predictability optimization, and that such measures are computationally efficient compared to robustness optimization using sampling based methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Feng Y (1988) Theory of structural redundancy and its effects on structural design. Comput Struct 28:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y, Moses F (1986) Optimum design, redundancy and reliability of structural systems. Comput Struct 24:239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkel DE (2003) DIRECT optimization algorithm user guide. Center for Research in Scientific Computation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, March 2003

  • Frangopol DM, Curley JP (1987) Effects of damage and redundancy on structural reliability. J Struct Eng 13:1533–1549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DR, Perttunen CD, Stuckman BE (1993) Lipschitzian optimization without the Lipschitz constant. J Optim Theory Appl 79:157–181

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller KM, Liu M, Burns SA (2002) Fully stressed design of frame structures and multiple load paths. J Struct Eng 128:806–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtha-Smith E (1988) Alternate path analysis of space trusses for progressive collapse. J Struct Eng 114:1978–1999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebastian MW (2003) Collapse considerations and electrical analogies for statically indeterminate structures. J Struct Eng 130:1445–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman S, Salas P (2007) Optimization of composite laminates for robust and predictable progressive failure response. AIAA J 45(5):1113–1125

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satchi Venkataraman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marhadi, K., Venkataraman, S. Surrogate measures to optimize structures for robust and predictable progressive failure. Struct Multidisc Optim 39, 245–261 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-008-0326-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-008-0326-4

Keywords

Navigation