Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Computerassistierte Rekonstruktion des vorderen Kreuzbandes mit dem Navigationssystem

Computer-assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with the OrthoPilot navigation system

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Arthroskopie Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Mit der navigierten vorderen Kreuzbandplastik sind auch weniger geübte Operateure in der Lage, die richtigen Bohrkanäle legen zu können. Durch umfangreiche Studien in der Anatomie und den Gebrauch des Systems durch Assistenten konnte die Sicherheit der navigierten Bohrkanallegung dokumentiert werden. Somit kann die navigierte Durchführung der vorderen Kreuzbandplastik zum Wohle der Patienten und der Kostenträger einen deutlichen Beitrag zur präzisen Durchführung der vorderen Kreuzbandplastik leisten.

Abstract

The computed-navigated technique for surgical repair of the anterior cruciate ligament enables even less experienced surgeons to correctly place drilling channels. The safety of navigated channel drilling was documented by comprehensive anatomical studies and use of the system by assistants. Employment of the computed-navigated technique for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament can be beneficial to both patients and health insurance providers by ensuring accuracy of the procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Amis A, Jakob R (1998) Anterior cruciate ligament graft positioning, tension and twisting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:S2–S12

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bensmann K, Rosenthal A et al. (2001) Multicentererfahrungen mit einem System zur computerassistierten vorderen Kreuzbandrekonstruktion. Orthop Praxis 37(1):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernard M, Hertel P (1996) Die intraoperative und postoperative Insertionskontrolle bei vorderen Kreuzbandplastiken. Unfallchirurg 99:332–340

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bernhard M, Hertel P et al. (1997) Femoral insertion of the ACL; radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg 10:14

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burkart A, Debski R et al. (2002) Precision of ACL tunnel placement using traditional and robotic techniques. Comp Aided Surg 6:270–278

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fu FH, Bennett C et al. (2000) Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part II: operative procedures and clinical correlations. Am J Sports Med 28:124–130

    Google Scholar 

  7. Griffin JR, Hamer CD (2001) Failed anterior cruciate ligament surgery, overview of the problem. Am J Knee Surg 14:185–192

    Google Scholar 

  8. Howell S (1998) Principles for placing the tibial tunnel and avoiding roof impingement during reconstruction of a torn anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:S49–S55

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hutchinson M, Ash S (2003) Resident's ridge: assessing the cortical thickness of the lateral wall and roof of the intercondylar notch. Arthroscopy 9:931–935

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klos T, Banks S et al. (2000) Sagittal plane imaging: parameters for computer assisted fluoroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Comp Aided Surg 5:28–34

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klos TV, Habets RJ et al. (1998) Computer assistance in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop 354:65–69

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lobenhoffer P, Bernard M et al. (2003) Qualitätssicherung in der Kreuzbandchirurgie. Arthroskopie 16:202–208

    Google Scholar 

  13. McGuire DA, Hendricks SD et al. (1997) The relationship between anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction tibial tunnel location and the anterior aspect of the posterior cruciate ligament insertion. Arthroscopy 13:465–473

    Google Scholar 

  14. McGuire DA, Wolchok M (1998) Arthroscopic Lachman test: a new technique using anatomic references. Arthroscopy 6:641–642

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miller M, Olszewski M (1997) Cruciate ligament graft intra-articular distances. Arthroscopy 3:291–295

    Google Scholar 

  16. Musahl V, Burkart A et al. (2002) Accuracy of anterior cruciate ligament tunnel placement with an active robotic system: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 9:968–973

    Google Scholar 

  17. Musahl V, Burkart A et al. (2003) Anterior cruciate ligament tunnel placement: comparison of insertion site with the guidelines of a computer-assisted surgical system. Arthroscopy 19:154–160

    Google Scholar 

  18. Olszewski M, Miller M et al. (1998) Ideal tibial tunnel length for endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 1:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pässler H, Höher J (2004) Intraoperative Qualitätskontrolle bei der Bohrkanalplazierung zum vorderen Kreuzbandersatz. Unfallchirurg 107:263–272

    Google Scholar 

  20. Petermann J, Schierl M et al. (2000) Computerassistierte Planung und roboterassistierte Ersatzplastik des vorderen Kreuzbandes mit dem CASPAR-System. Arthroskopie 13:270–279

    Google Scholar 

  21. Picard F, DiGioia A et al. (2002) Accuracy in tunnel placement for ACL reconstruction. Comparison of traditional arthroscopic and computer-assisted navigation techniques. Comp Aided Surg 6:279–298

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sati M, Staeubli HU et al. (2000) Clinical integration of computer-assisted technology for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Operat Techn Ortho 10:40

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sati M, Staeubli HU et al. (2002) Real-time computerized in situ guidance system for ACL graft replacement. Comp Aided Surg 7:25–40

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stäubli H-U, Rauschning W (1994) Tibial attachment area of the torn anterior cruciate ligament in the extended knee position. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2:138–146

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stäubli H-U, Adam O et al. (1999) Anterior cruciate ligament and intercondylar notch in the coronal oblique plane: anatomy complemented by magnetic resonance imaging in cruciate ligament-intact knees. Arthroscopy 4:349–359

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt:

Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopädische Gemeinschaftspraxis Straubing

    J. Eichhorn & N. Girdano

  2. Orthopädische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Hebbelstr. 14a, 94315 , Straubing

    J. Eichhorn

Authors
  1. J. Eichhorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Girdano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Eichhorn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eichhorn, J., Girdano, N. Computerassistierte Rekonstruktion des vorderen Kreuzbandes mit dem Navigationssystem. Arthroskopie 18, 24–26 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00142-004-0291-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00142-004-0291-x

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation