Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of a computer-generated alert system on the quality of tight glycemic control

  • Original
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the impact of a computer-generated blood glucose (BG) alert, generated by a Patient Data Management System (PDMS) and superimposed on a paper-based guideline, on tight glycemic control (TGC) in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods

TGC in the Leuven University Hospitals is performed by nurses using a paper-based guideline that allows anticipative, intuitive decision-making. An electronic alert was implemented on 1 August 2007 in which a pop-up appears in the PDMS at the following BG thresholds: >180, >110, 60–80, 40–60 and <40 mg/dl. The impact of this electronic alert was assessed by a sequential cohort study: the mean BG, the glycemic penalty index (GPI), the hyperglycemic index (HGI), the number of hypoglycemic events, the standard deviation (SD) of the BG time series and the number of BG measurements were compared in all adults admitted 6 months before (‘pre-alert group’, n = 729) and after (‘alert group’, n = 644) the implementation of the electronic alert.

Results

The alert resulted in a reduction of mean BG (112 vs. 110 mg/dl, p = 0.002), GPI (20 vs. 19, p = 0.029) and HGI (10 vs. 9 mg/dl, p = 0.004), without increasing BG sampling (median 25 measurements/patient in both groups, p = 0.776). The alert reduced the proportion of patients experiencing an episode of hypoglycemia from 6.5 to 4.0% (p = 0.043). The SD of the BG time series was not affected (28 mg/dl in both groups, p = 0.566).

Conclusion

A computer-generated alert was able to statistically significantly improve the quality of TGC in ICU patients without increasing the need for blood sampling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, Vlasselaers D, Ferdinande P, Lauwers P, Bouillon R (2001) Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 345:1359–1367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van den Berghe G, Wilmer A, Hermans G, Meersseman W, Wouters PJ, Milants I, Van Wijngaerden E, Bobbaers H, Bouillon R (2006) Intensive Insulin Therapy in the Medical ICU. N Engl J Med 354:449–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vlasselaers D, Milants I, Desmet L, Wouters PJ, Vanhorebeek I, van den Heuvel I, Mesotten D, Casaer MP, Meyfroidt G, Ingels C, Muller J, Van Cromphaut S, Schetz M, Van den Berghe G (2009) Intensive insulin therapy for patients in pediatric intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled study. Lancet 373(9663):547–556

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brunkhorst FM, Engel C, Bloos F, Meier-Hellmann A, Ragaller M, Weiler N, Moerer O, Gruendling M, Oppert M, Grond S, Olthoff D, Jaschinski U, John S, Rossaint R, Welte T, Schaefer M, Kern P, Kuhnt E, Kiehntopf M, Hartog C, Natanson C, Loeffler M, Reinhart K, German Competence Network Sepsis (SepNet) (2008) Intensive Insulin Therapy and Pentastarch Resuscitation in Severe Sepsis. N Engl J Med 358:125–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Preiser JC, Devos P, Ruiz-Santana S, Mélot C, Annane D, Groeneveld J, Iapichino G, Leverve X, Nitenberg G, Singer P, Wernerman J, Joannidis M, Stecher A, Chioléro R (2009) A prospective randomised multi-centre controlled trial on tight glucose control by intensive insulin therapy in adult intensive care units: the Glucontrol study. Intensive Care Med 35:1738–1748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. De La Rosa GC, Donado JH, Restrepo AH, Quintero AM, González LG, Saldarriaga NE, Bedoya M, Toro JM, Velásquez JB, Valencia JC, Arango CM, Aleman PH, Vasquez EM, Chavarriaga JC, Yepes A, Pulido W, Cadavid CA, Grupo de Investigacion en Cuidado intensivo: GICI-HPTU (2008) Strict glycemic control in patients hospitalized in a mixed medical and surgical intensive care unit: a randomized clinical trial. Crit Care 12:R120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arabi YM, Dabbagh OC, Tamim HM, Al-Shimemeri AA, Memish ZA, Haddad SH, Syed SJ, Giridhar HR, Rishu AH, Al-Daker MO, Kahoul SH, Britts RJ, Sakkijha MH (2008) Intensive versus conventional insulin therapy: a randomized controlled trial in medical and surgical critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 36:3190–3197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators, Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY, Blair D, Foster D, Dhingra V, Bellomo R, Cook D, Dodek P, Henderson WR, Hébert PC, Heritier S, Heyland DK, McArthur C, McDonald E, Mitchell I, Myburgh JA, Norton R, Potter J, Robinson BG, Ronco JJ (2009) Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 360:1283–1297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. The COIITSS Study Investigators (2010) Corticosteroid treatment and intensive insulin therapy for septic shock in adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 303:341–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vriesendorp TM, DeVries JH, van Santen S, Moeniralam HS, de Jonge E, Roos YB, Schultz MJ, Rosendaal FR, Hoekstra JB (2006) Evaluation of short term consequences of hypoglycemia in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 34:2714–2718

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Eslami S, de Keizer NF, de Jonge E, Schultz MJ, Abu-Hanna A (2008) A systematic review on quality indicators for tight glycaemic control in critically ill patients: need for an unambiguous indicator reference subset. Crit Care 12:R139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vogelzang M, van der Horst IC, Nijsten MW (2004) Hyperglycemic index as a tool to assess glucose control: a retrospective study. Crit Care 8:R122–R127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Herpe T, De Brabanter J, Beullens M, De Moor B, Van den Berghe G (2008) Glycemic penalty index for adequately assessing and comparing different blood glucose control algorithms. Crit Care 12:R24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wintergerst KA, Buckingham B, Gandrud L, Wong BJ, Kache S, Wilson DM (2006) Association of hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia and glucose variability with morbidity and death in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatrics 118:173–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Egi M, Bellomo R, Stachowski E, French CJ, Hart G (2006) Variability of blood glucose concentration and short term mortality in critically ill patients. Anesthesiology 105:244–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ali NA, O’Brien JM Jr, Dungan K, Phillips G, Marsh CB, Lemeshow S, Connors AF Jr, Preiser JC (2008) Glucose variability and mortality in patients with sepsis. Crit Care Med 36:2316–2321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Meyfroidt G, Keenan DM, Wang X, Wouters PJ, Veldhuis JD, Van den Berghe G (2010) Dynamic characteristics of blood glucose time series during the course of critical illness: effects of intensive insulin therapy and relative association with mortality. Crit Care Med 38:1021–1029

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. de Graaff MJ, Spronk PE, Schultz MJ (2007) Tight glycemic control: intelligent technology or a nurse-wise strategy? Crit Care 11:421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cordingley JJ, Vlasselaers D, Dormand NC, Wouters PJ, Squire SD, Chassin LJ, Wilinska ME, Morgan CJ, Hovorka R, Van den Berghe G (2009) Intensive insulin therapy: enhanced Model Predictive Control algorithm versus standard care. Intensive Care Med 35:123–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kucher N, Castellanos LR, Quiroz R, Koo S, Fanikos J, Goldhaber SZ (2005) Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients. N Eng J Med 352:969–977

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Eslami S, Abu-Hanna A, de Jonge E, de Keizer NF (2009) Tight glycemic control and computerized decision-support systems: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med 35:1505–1517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Morris AH (2000) Developing and implementing computerized protocols for standardization of clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med 132:373–383

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rood E, Bosman RJ, van der Spoel JI, Taylor P, Zandstra DF (2005) Use of a computerized guideline for glucose regulation in the intensive care unit improved both guideline adherence and glucose regulation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 12:172–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Morris AH, Orme J Jr, Truwit JD, Steingrub J, Grissom C, Lee KH, Li GL, Thompson BT, Brower R, Tidswell M, Bernard GR, Sorenson D, Sward K, Zheng H, Schoenfeld D, Warner H (2008) A replicable method for blood glucose control in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 36:1787–1795

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. DuBose JJ, Nomoto S, Higa L, Paolim R, Teixeira PG, Inaba K, Demetriades D, Belzberg H (2009) Nursing involvement improves compliance with tight blood glucose control in the trauma ICU: a prospective observational study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 25:101–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chase JG, Shaw G, Le Compte A, Lonergan T, Willacy M, Wong XW, Lin J, Lotz T, Lee D, Hann C (2006) A pilot study of the SPRINT protocol for tight glycemic control in critically ill patients. Diabetes Tech Therapeut 8:449–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Dr. Dieter Mesotten for proofreading the manuscript. This work was presented in part as an abstract at the 29th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Brussels, Belgium on 24 March 2009. The work was funded by the Research Fund of the University of Leuven (GOA 2007/14), a doctoral fellowship to GM from the Belgian Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO) and by long-term structural funding to GVdB via the Methusalem program of the Flemish Government. The work was supported by the Fund for Scientific Research (FWO), Flanders, Belgium (G.0533.06 and G.0310.08), the Research Council of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (GOA/2007/14), and the Methusalem Programme from the Flemish Government to GVdB. GM was a doctoral fellow of the Fund for Scientific Research (FWO), Flanders, Belgium (1700809 N).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geert Meyfroidt.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Appendix 1 (DOC 33 kb)

Supplementary Appendix 2 (DOC 27 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyfroidt, G., Wouters, P., De Becker, W. et al. Impact of a computer-generated alert system on the quality of tight glycemic control. Intensive Care Med 37, 1151–1157 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-011-2159-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-011-2159-7

Keywords

Navigation