Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem during intermittent and continuous intravenous application in patients treated by continuous renal replacement therapy

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The clinical effect of beta-lactam antibiotics depends on the time of drug concentration above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for a susceptible bacterium. Continuous infusion (CI) of ß-lactams such as meropenem may therefore be a more rational approach than intermittent bolus injections (IB). The aim of this study was to test whether CI of meropenem achieves effective drug concentrations comparable to IB in patients treated by continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

Design

Prospective, randomised cross-over study.

Setting

Twelve-bed medical intensive care unit (ICU).

Patients and interventions

Six ICU patients were randomised to receive either meropenem 1 g IB every 12 h or a 0.5 g i.v. loading dose followed by 2 g i.v. CI over 24 h. After 2 days, regimens were crossed over. Meropenem pharmacokinetics were determined on days 2 and 4.

Measurements and results

Peak serum concentration [median (25% and 75% quartiles)] after short infusion of 1 g meropenem were 62.8 (51.4; 85.0) mg/l, trough levels at 12 h were 8.1 (4.5; 18.7) mg/l, and serum half-life was 5.3 (5.1; 7.0) h. Steady-state concentrations during CI were 18.6 (13.3; 24.5) mg/l. The AUCs during either treatment were comparable and determined as 233 (202; 254) mg/l*h (IB) and 227 (182; 283) mg/l*h (CI), respectively. Four hours after IB, drug concentrations dropped below CI steady-state concentrations.

Conclusion

Appropriate antibacterial concentrations of meropenem in patients with CRRT are easily achievable with CI. CI may be an effective alternative dosing regimen to IB. A prospective comparison of the clinical efficacy of the two dosage regimens is warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Craig WA, Ebert SC (1990) Killing and regrowth of bacteria in vitro: a review. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl 74:63–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Craig WA, Ebert SC (1992) Continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 36:2577–2583

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Turnidge JD (1998) The pharmacodynamics of beta-lactams. Clin Infect Dis 27:10–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vogelman B, Craig WA (1986) Kinetics of antimicrobial activity. J Pediatr 108:835–840

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Craig WA (1998) Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin Infect Dis 26:1–10; quiz 11–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nicolau DP (2001) Predicting antibacterial response from pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles. Infection 29 Suppl 2:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nicolau DP, Nightingale CH, Banevicius MA, Fu Q, Quintiliani R (1996) Serum bactericidal activity of ceftazidime: continuous infusion versus intermittent injections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40:61–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Elkhaili H, Niedergang S, Pompei D, Linger L, Leveque D, Jehl F (1996) High-performance liquid chromatographic assay for meropenem in serum. J Chromatogr B 686:19–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jaruratanasirikul S, Sriwiriyajan S (2003) Stability of meropenem in normal saline solution after storage at room temperature. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 34:627–629

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Takeuchi Y, Takebayashi Y, Sunagawa M, Isobe Y, Hamazume Y, Uemura A, Noguchi T (1993) The stability of a novel carbapenem antibiotic, meropenem (SM-7338), in a solid state formulation for injection. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 41:1998–2002

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel PR, Cook SE (1997) Stability of meropenem in intravenous solutions. Am J Health Syst Pharm 54:412–421

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuti JL, Nightingale CH, Knauft RF Nicolau DP (2004) Pharmacokinetic properties and stability of continuous-infusion meropenem in adults with cystic fibrosis. Clin Ther 26:493–501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Viaene E, Chanteux H, Servais H, Mingeot-Leclercq MP, Tulkens PM (2002) Comparative stability studies of antipseudomonal beta-lactams for potential administration through portable elastomeric pumps (home therapy for cystic fibrosis patients) and motor-operated syringes (intensive care units). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:2327–2332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ververs TF, van Dijk A, Vinks SA, Blankestijn PJ, Savelkoul JF, Meulenbelt J, Boereboom FT (2000) Pharmacokinetics and dosing regimen of meropenem in critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration. Crit Care Med 28:3412–3416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Valtonen M, Tiula E, Backman JT, Neuvonen PJ (2000) Elimination of meropenem during continuous veno-venous haemofiltration and haemodiafiltration in patients with acute renal failure. J Antimicrob Chemother 45:701–704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Krueger WA, Neeser G, Schuster H, Schroeder TH, Hoffmann E, Heininger A, Dieterich HJ, Forst H, Unertl KE (2003) Correlation of meropenem plasma levels with pharmacodynamic requirements in critically ill patients receiving continuous veno-venous hemofiltration. Chemotherapy 49:280–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Thalhammer F, Traunmuller F, El Menyawi I, Frass M, Hollenstein UM, Locker GJ, Stoiser B, Staudinger T, Thalhammer-Scherrer R, Burgmann H (1999) Continuous infusion versus intermittent administration of meropenem in critically ill patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 43:523–527

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tegeder I, Neumann F, Bremer F, Brune K, Lötsch J, Geisslinger G (1999) Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients with acute renal failure undergoing continuous venovenous hemofiltration. Clin Pharmacol Ther 65:50–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Thalhammer F, Schenk P, Burgmann H, El Menyawi I, Hollenstein UM, Rosenkranz AR, Sunder-Plassmann G, Breyer S, Ratheiser K (1998) Single-dose pharmacokinetics of meropenem during continuous venovenous hemofiltration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:2417–2420

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Krueger WA, Schroeder TH, Hutchison M, Hoffmann E, Dieterich HJ, Heininger A, Erley C, Wehrle A, Unertl K (1998) Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients with acute renal failure treated by continuous hemodiafiltration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:2421–2424

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Giles LJ, Jennings AC, Thomson AH, Creed G, Beale RJ, McLuckie A (2000) Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in intensive care unit patients receiving continuous veno-venous hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration. Crit Care Med 28:632–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Meyer MM, Munar MY, Kohlhepp SJ, Bryant RE (1999) Meropenem pharmacokinetics in a patient with multiorgan failure from meningococcemia undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration. Am J Kidney Dis 33:790–795

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuti JL, Nicolau DP (2005) Derivation of meropenem dosage in patients receiving continuous veno-venous hemofiltration based on pharmacodynamic target attainment. Chemotherapy 51:211–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Robatel C, Decosterd L A, Biollaz J, Eckert P, Schaller MD, Buclin T (2003) Pharmacokinetics and dosage adaptation of meropenem during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration in critically ill patients. J Clin Pharmacol 43:1329–1340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Carl Waldman for his stimulating comments on our work.

This work was supported by a grant from AstraZeneca for pharmacokinetic analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Regensburg, 93042, Regensburg, Germany

    Julia Langgartner & Antje Vasold

  2. Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital Traunstein, Postfach 1820, 83276, Traunstein, Germany

    Thomas Glück

  3. Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital Bogen, Mussinanstr. 8, 94327, Bogen, Germany

    Michel Reng

  4. Department of Pharmacology, University of Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany

    Frieder Kees

Authors
  1. Julia Langgartner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antje Vasold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas Glück
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michel Reng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Frieder Kees
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Langgartner.

Additional information

The authors wrote this article in cooperation with the TAHI section of the ESICM.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langgartner, J., Vasold, A., Glück, T. et al. Pharmacokinetics of meropenem during intermittent and continuous intravenous application in patients treated by continuous renal replacement therapy. Intensive Care Med 34, 1091–1096 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1034-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1034-7

Keywords