Abstract
Objective
The objective was to determine the minimum volume of instillation fluid for intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurement, and to evaluate the effect of instillation volume on transvesically measured IAP.
Design
Prospective cohort study
Setting
Twenty-two-bed surgical ICU of the Ghent University Hospital
Patients and participants
Twenty patients at risk of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH).
Interventions
Transvesical IAP measurement using volumes from 10 to 100 ml. Minimal volume at which an IAP was measured was recorded (IAPmin), as well as IAP at 50 and 100 ml of instillation volume (IAP50 and IAP100). The percentage difference for IAP50 and IAP100 was calculated.
Measurements and results
The minimal volume for IAP measurement was 10 ml in all patients. Mean IAPmin was 12.8 mmHg (± 4.9), mean IAP50 15 mmHg (± 4.5) and mean IAP100 17.1mmHg (± 4.7). The mean percentage difference for IAP50 was 21% (± 17%), and 40% (± 29%) for IAP100.
Twelve patients were categorised as suffering from IAH when 10 ml of saline was used for IAP measurement, increasing to 15 and 17 patients respectively when using 50 and 100 ml.
In patients with IAH, there was a significant correlation between the duration of bladder drainage and percentage difference for IAP100 (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.60, p = 0.03).
Conclusions
Using 50 or 100 ml of saline for IAP measurement in critically ill patients results in higher IAP values compared with the use of 10 ml, and possibly, in overestimation of the incidence of intra-abdominal hypertension.
References
Malbrain ML (2004) Is it wise not to think about intraabdominal hypertension in the ICU? Curr Opin Crit Care 10:132–145
Malbrain ML, Chiumello D, Pelosi P, Wilmer A, Brienza N, Malcangi V, Bihari D, Innes R, Cohen J, Singer P, Japiassu A, Kurtop E, De Keulenaer BL, Daelemans R, Del Turco M, Cosimini P, Ranieri M, Jacquet L, Laterre PF, Gattinoni L (2004) Prevalence of intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients: a multicentre epidemiological study. Intensive Care Med 30:822–829
Kron IL, Harman PK, Nolan SP (1984) The measurement of intra-abdominal pressure as a criterion for abdominal re-exploration. Ann Surg 199:28–30
Fusco MA, Martin RS, Chang MC (2001) Estimation of intra-abdominal pressure by bladder pressure measurement: validity and methodology. J Trauma 50:297–302
Johna S (2001) Can we use the bladder to estimate intra-abdominal pressure? J Trauma 51:1218
Malbrain ML (2004) Different techniques to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP): time for a critical re-appraisal. Intensive Care Med 30:357–371
Cheatham ML, Safcsak K (1998) Intraabdominal pressure: a revised method for measurement. J Am Coll Surg 186:594–595
Hackler RH, Hall MK, Zampieri TA (1989) Bladder hypocompliance in the spinal cord injury population. J Urol 141:1390–1393
Johna S, Taylor E, Brown C, Zimmerman G (1999) Abdominal compartment syndrome: does intra-cystic pressure reflect actual intra-abdominal pressure? A prospective study in surgical patients. Crit Care (Lond) 3:135–138
Iberti TJ, Lieber CE, Benjamin E (1989) Determination of intra-abdominal pressure using a transurethral bladder catheter: clinical validation of the technique. Anesthesiology 70:47–50
Balogh Z, Jones F, D'Amours S, Parr M, Sugrue M (2004) Continuous intra-abdominal pressure measurement technique. Am J Surg 188:679–684
Lonardo M, Piazza O (2005) Incidence of intraabdominal hypertension in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 33:2150
Burch JM, Moore EE, Moore FA, Franciose R (1996) The abdominal compartment syndrome. Surg Clin North Am 76:833–842
Cheatham ML, White MW, Sagraves SG, Johnson JL, Block EF (2000) Abdominal perfusion pressure: a superior parameter in the assessment of intra-abdominal hypertension. J Trauma 49:621–626
Acknowledgements
Jan J. De Waele is supported by a Clinical Doctoral Grant from the Fund for Scientific Research — Flanders (Belgium; F.W.O. – Vlaanderen).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was presented at the annual meeting of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam 10–13 October 2005
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Waele, J., Pletinckx, P., Blot, S. et al. Saline volume in transvesical intra-abdominal pressure measurement: enough is enough. Intensive Care Med 32, 455–459 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-0062-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-0062-9