Skip to main content
Log in

Should the autopsy be resuscitated?—Pro

  • Pro/Con Debate
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Roberts WC (1978) The autopsy: its decline and suggestion for its revival. N Engl J Med 299:332–338

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sanner MA (1994) In perspective of the declining autopsy rate. Arch Pathol Lab Med 118:878–383

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marwick C (1995) Pathologists request autopsy revival JAMA 273:188–991

    Google Scholar 

  4. McPhee SJ, Bottles K (1985) Autopsy: moribund art or vital science? Am J Med 78:107–113

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baker PB, Zarbo RJ, Howanitz PJ (1996) Quality assurance of autopsy face sheet reporting, final autopsy report turnaround time, and autopsy rates. Arch Pathol Lab Med 120:1003–1008

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schatz I (1995) Internal medicine residency program violations of the minimum autopsy rate. JAMA 273:1092

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hill RB, Anderson RE (1996) The recent history of the autopsy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 120:702–712

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldman L, Sayson R, Robbins S, Cohn LH, et al (1983) The value of autopsy in three medical eras. N Eng J Med 308:1000–1005

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sondereger-Iselli K, Burger S, Muntwyler J, Salomon F (2000) Diagnostic errors in three medical eras: a necropsy study. Lancet 355:2027–2031

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Roosen J, Frans E, Wilmer A, Knockaert DC, Bobbaers H (2000) Comparison of premortem clinical diagnoses in critically ill patients and subsequent autopsy findings. Mayo Clin Proc 75:562–567

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mort TC, Yeston NS (1999) The relationship of pre mortem diagnoses and post mortem findings in a surgical ICU. Crit Care Med 27:299–303

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chariot P, Witt K, Pautot V, Porcher R, et al (2000) Declining autopsy rate in a French hospital. Arch Pathol Lab Med 214:739–745

    Google Scholar 

  13. Blosser SA, Zimmerman HE, Stauffer JL (1998) Do autopsies of critically ill patients reveal important findings that were clinically undetected? Crit Care Med 26:1332–1336

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fernandez-Segoviano P, Lazaro A, Esteban A, Rubio JM, et al (1988) Autopsy as quality assurance in the ICU. Crit Care Med 16:683–685

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gut AL, Ferreira ALA, Montenegro MR (1999) Autopsy: quality assurance in the ICU. Intensive Care Med 25:360–363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Anonymous (2001) Hospital release details of retained organs. BMJ 322:1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brandel JP, Delasberie-Lauprête N, Laplanche JL, Hauw JJ, Alpérovitch A (2000) Diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Neurology 54:1095–1099

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McPhee SJ (1996) Maximizing the benefits of autopsy for clinicians and families Arch Pathol Lab Med 120:743–748

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sanner MA (1994) Comparison of public attitudes toward autopsy, organ donation and anatomic dissection. JAMA 271:284–288

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am indebted to Samuel Fulli-Lemaire for his helpful editing of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lemaire, F. Should the autopsy be resuscitated?—Pro. Intensive Care Med 29, 518–521 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-002-1630-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-002-1630-x

Keywords

Navigation