Abstract
This study was carried out to evaluate the agricultural usage of an anaerobically digested sludge in the contents and fractions of heavy metals. Therefore, a sequential extraction scheme according to the BCR’s (Community Bureau of Reference) guidelines and total acid digestion were applied to sewage sludge samples. The results of total heavy metal concentrations in sewage sludge showed that the highest total concentrations were Fe, Zn and Mn. When Turkish, Europe and US EPA directives were compared with each other by depending on the use of sludge for agricultural purposes, all the heavy metals determined for this sludge were below the maximum permitted levels, except for Cd. This sludge should not be applied to land due to its high Cd content. The results of heavy metal fractions indicated that some metals (Cd, Mn, Pb, and Fe) distributed mainly in the residual fraction. All fractions of Zn showed no variation. Cu and Cr were most abundant in the oxidizable phase while Ni was in exchangeable phase. Although total content of Ni in the sludge is lower than the maximum levels allowed by all the directives, it tends to be easily moved and dispersed in the environment. Due to its high mobility, the examined sewage sludge may cause phyto-toxicity after its agricultural application.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alonso Alvarez E, Callejon M, Jimenez JC, Ternero M (2002) Heavy metal extractable forms in sludge from wastewater treatment plants. Chemosphere 47:765–775. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00021-8
Babel S, Dacera DM (2006) Heavy metal removal from contaminated sludge for land application: a review. Waste Manage 26:988–1004. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2005.09.017
Fuentes A, Lloren M, Saez J, Soler A, Aguilar MI, Ortuno JF, Meseguer VF (2004) Simple and sequential extractions of heavy metals from different sewage sludge. Chemosphere 54:1039–1047. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.10.029
Fuentes A, Llorens M, Saez J, Aguilar MI, Perez-Marin AB, Ortuno JF, Meseguer VF (2006) Ecotoxicity, phytotoxicity and extractability of heavy metals from different stabilised sewage sludges. Environ Pollut 143:355–360. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2005.11.035
Mossakowska A, Hellström BG, Hultman B (1998) Strategies for sludge handling in the Stockholm region. Water Sci Technol 38:111–118. doi:10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00436-3
Mossop KF, Davidson CM (2003) Comparison of original and modified BCR sequential extraction procedures for the fractionation of copper, iron, lead, manganese and zinc in soils and sediments. Anal Chim Acta 478:111–118. doi:10.1016/S0003-2670(02)01485-X
Sahuquillo A, Lopez-Sanchez JF, Rubio R, Rauret G, Thomas RP, Davidson CM, Ure AU (1999) Use of a certifired reference material for extractable trace metals to assess sources of uncertainty in the BCR three-stage sequential extraction procedure. Anal Chim Acta 382:317–327. doi:10.1016/S0003-2670(98)00754-5
Wang C, Hu X, Chen ML, Wu YH (2005) Total concentrations and fractions of Cd, Cr, Pb, Cu, Ni and Zn in sewage sludge from municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants. J Hazard Mater 119:245–249. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.11.023
Walter I, Martinez F, Cala V (2006) Heavy metal speciation and phytotoxic effects of three representative sewage sludges for agricultural uses. Environ Pollut 139:507–514. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2005.05.020
Wang C, Li CX, Ma HT, Qian J, Zhai JB (2006) Distribution of extractable fractions of heavy metals in sludge during the wastewater treatment process. J Hazard Mater 137:1277–1283. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.04.026
Zufiaurre R, Olivar A, Chamarro P, Callizo A (1998) Speciation of metals in sewage sludge for agricultural uses. Analyst 123:255–259. doi:10.1039/a705168i
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hanay, Ö., Hasar, H., Kocer, N.N. et al. Evaluation for Agricultural Usage with Speciation of Heavy Metals in a Municipal Sewage Sludge. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 81, 42–46 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-008-9451-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-008-9451-4