Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perceived risk of LSD varies with age and race: evidence from 2019 United States cross-sectional data

  • Research
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Psychedelics are being explored for their potential therapeutic benefits across a wide range of psychiatric diagnoses and may usher in a new age in psychiatric treatment. There is stigma associated with these currently illegal substances, and use varies by race and age. We hypothesized that minoritized racial and ethnic populations, relative to White respondents, would perceive psychedelic use as riskier.

Methods

Using 2019 cross-sectional data from the National Survey of Drug Use and Health, we conducted a secondary analysis of 41,679 respondents. Perceived risk of heroin was used as a surrogate for overall risk of illegal substance use; heroin and lysergic acid diethylamide were the only substances queried this way in the sample.

Results

A majority regarded lysergic acid diethylamide (66.7%) and heroin (87.3%) as a great risk if used once or twice. There were clear differences by race, with White respondents and those indicating more than one race having significantly lower perceived risk of lysergic acid diethylamide than respondents from other groups. Perceived risk of use also significantly increased with age.

Conclusion

Perceived risk of lysergic acid diethylamide is unevenly distributed across the population. Stigma and racial disparities in drug-related crimes likely contribute to this. As research into potential therapeutic indications for psychedelics continues, perceived risk of use may change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available in Substance Abuse & Mental Health Data Archive at https://www.datafiles.samhsa.gov/dataset/national-survey-drug-use-and-health-2019-nsduh-2019-ds0001. These data were derived from the following resources available in the public domain: National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NDDUH).

References

  1. Hyman SE (2013) Psychiatric drug development: diagnosing a crisis. Cerebrum 2013:5

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Becker RE, Seeman MV, Greig NH, Lahiri DK (2015) What can triumphs and tribulations from drug research in Alzheimer’s disease tell us about the development of psychotropic drugs in general? Lancet Psychiatry 2:756–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00214-X

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Belouin SJ, Henningfield JE (2018) Psychedelics: Where we are now, why we got here, what we must do. Neuropharmacology 142:7–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.02.018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hadar A, David J, Shalit N et al (2022) The psychedelic renaissance in clinical research: a bibliometric analysis of three decades of human studies with psychedelics. J Psychoactive Drugs. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2021.2022254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carhart-Harris RL, Bolstridge M, Rucker J et al (2016) Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: an open-label feasibility study. Lancet Psychiatry 3:619–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30065-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carhart-Harris RL, Giribaldi B, Watts R et al (2021) Trial of psilocybin versus escitalopram for depression. N Engl J Med 384:1402–1411. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2032994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Palhano-Fontes F, Barreto D, Onias H et al (2019) Rapid antidepressant effects of the psychedelic ayahuasca in treatment-resistant depression: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Psychol Med 49:655–663. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718001356

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Mithoefer MC, Wagner MT, Mithoefer AT et al (2011) The safety and efficacy of {+/–}3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-assisted psychotherapy in subjects with chronic, treatment-resistant posttraumatic stress disorder: the first randomized controlled pilot study. J Psychopharmacol 25:439–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881110378371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mithoefer MC, Mithoefer AT, Feduccia AA et al (2018) 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-assisted psychotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder in military veterans, firefighters, and police officers: a randomised, double-blind, dose-response, phase 2 clinical trial. Lancet Psychiatry 5:486–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30135-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bogenschutz MP, Ross S, Bhatt S et al (2022) Percentage of heavy drinking days following psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy vs placebo in the treatment of adult patients with alcohol use disorder: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiat 79:953–962. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.2096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson MW, Garcia-Romeu A, Cosimano MP, Griffiths RR (2014) Pilot study of the 5-HT2AR agonist psilocybin in the treatment of tobacco addiction. J Psychopharmacol 28:983–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881114548296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Nutt D, Erritzoe D, Carhart-Harris R (2020) Psychedelic psychiatry’s brave new world. Cell 181:24–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Palamar JJ, Le A, Mateu-Gelabert P (2019) Perceived risk of heroin in relation to other drug use in a representative US sample. J Psychoactive Drugs 51:463–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2019.1632506

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Shalit N, Rehm J, Lev-Ran S (2019) Epidemiology of hallucinogen use in the U.S. results from the National epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions III. Addict Behav 89:35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.09.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Killion B, Hai AH, Alsolami A et al (2021) LSD use in the United States: Trends, correlates, and a typology of us. Drug Alcohol Depend 223:108715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yockey RA, Vidourek RA, King KA (2020) Trends in LSD use among US adults: 2015–2018. Drug Alcohol Depend 212:108071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith DT, Faber SC, Buchanan NT et al (2021) The need for psychedelic-assisted therapy in the black community and the burdens of its provision. Front Psychiatry 12:774736. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.774736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Strauss D, de la Salle S, Sloshower J, Williams MT (2021) Research abuses against people of colour and other vulnerable groups in early psychedelic research. J Med Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cooper HLF (2015) War on drugs policing and police brutality. Subst Use Misuse 50:1188–1194. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2015.1007669

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kulesza M, Larimer ME, Rao D (2013) Substance use related stigma: what we know and the way forward. J Addict Behav Ther Rehabil. https://doi.org/10.4172/2324-9005.1000106

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Link BG, Struening EL, Rahav M et al (1997) On stigma and its consequences: evidence from a longitudinal study of men with dual diagnoses of mental illness and substance abuse. J Health Soc Behav 38:177–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (2020) 2019 National survey on drug use and health public use file codebook. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Rockville

    Google Scholar 

  23. StataCorp (2021) Stata statistical software: release 17. StataCorp LLC, College State, TX

  24. Levy P, Lemeshow S (2013) Sampling of populations: methods and applications, 4th edn. Wiley

  25. Lipari RN, Ahrnsbrak RD, Pemberton MR, Porter JD (2017) Risk and protective factors and estimates of substance use initiation: results from the 2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. NSDUH Data Review, Rockville

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chilcoat HD, Schütz CG (1996) Age-specific patterns of hallucinogen use in the US population: an analysis using generalized additive models. Drug Alcohol Depend 43:143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-8716(96)01297-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Golub A, Johnson BD, Sifaneck SJ et al (2001) Is the U.S. experiencing an incipient epidemic of hallucinogen use? Subst Use Misuse 36:1699–1729. https://doi.org/10.1081/ja-100107575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Wells JE, McGee MA, Baxter J et al (2009) Onset and lifetime use of drugs in New Zealand: results from Te Rau Hinengaro: the New Zealand Mental Health Survey 2003–2004. Drug Alcohol Rev 28:166–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2008.00043.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kuerbis A, Sacco P, Blazer DG, Moore AA (2014) Substance abuse among older adults. Clin Geriatr Med 30:629–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2014.04.008

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kuerbis A (2020) Substance use among older adults: an update on prevalence, etiology, assessment, and intervention. Gerontology 66:249–258. https://doi.org/10.1159/000504363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Arndt S, Clayton R, Schultz SK (2011) Trends in substance abuse treatment 1998–2008: increasing older adult first-time admissions for illicit drugs. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 19:704–711. https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e31820d942b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Weber A, Lynch A, Miskle B et al (2022) Older adult substance use treatment first-time admissions between 2008 and 2018. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2022.03.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. West SL, O’Neal KK (2004) Project D.A.R.E. outcome effectiveness revisited. Am J Public Health 94:1027–1029. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.94.6.1027

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Michaels TI, Purdon J, Collins A, Williams MT (2018) Inclusion of people of color in psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy: a review of the literature. BMC Psychiatry 18:245. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1824-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Vis PJ, Goudriaan AE, ter Meulen BC, Blom JD (2021) On Perception and Consciousness in HPPD: a systematic review. Front Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.675768

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Iowa Department of Public Health State Opioid Response Corrections Liaison and SBIRT under Grants 5881SA144E, 5881SA145E, and 5881SA137E; the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration under Grant TI081620; and the Health Resources and Services Administration under Grant T25HP37624. N.L.B. was supported by the University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine Physician Scientist Training Pathway, Iowa City, IA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N.L.B, A.N.W. and S.A. wrote the main manuscript text, and S.A. and A.C.L. prepared figures. S.A. conceived of and preformed the analysis. A.C.L. obtained funding. All authors reviewed the manuscript and provided editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas L. Bormann.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interest to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bormann, N.L., Weber, A.N., Miskle, B. et al. Perceived risk of LSD varies with age and race: evidence from 2019 United States cross-sectional data. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 58, 1503–1508 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-023-02448-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-023-02448-6

Keywords

Navigation