Abstract
Background
It has been suggested that community treatment orders (CTOs) will prevent readmission to hospital, but controlled studies have been inconclusive. We aimed to test the hypothesis that hospital discharges made subject to CTOs are associated with a reduced risk of readmission. The use of such a measure is likely to change after its introduction as clinicians acquire familiarity with it, and we also tested the hypothesis that the characteristics of patients subject to CTOs changed over time in the first decade of their use in Victoria, Australia.
Method
A database from Victoria, Australia (total population 4.8 million) was used. Cox proportional hazard models compared the hazard ratios of readmission to hospital before the end of the study period (1992–2000) for 16,216 discharges subject to a CTO and 112,211 not subject to a CTO.
Results
Community treatment orders used on discharge from a first admission to hospital were associated with a higher risk of readmission, but CTOs following subsequent admissions were associated with lower readmission risk. The risk also declined over the study period.
Conclusions
The effect of using a CTO depends on the patient’s history. At a population level their introduction may not reduce readmission to hospital. Their impact may change over time.
Declaration of interest
None.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Applebaum P (2001) Thinking carefully about outpatient commitment. Psych Serv 52(3):347–350
Bindman J (2002) Involuntary outpatient treatment in England and Wales. Curr Opin Psych 15:595–598
Department of Health (2000) Reforming The Mental Health Act. Part 1: The new legal framework. para 2.18, p.17. http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/05/89/14/04058914.pdf (last accessed 13.1.06)
Department of Health (2004) Draft Mental Health Bill. http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/08/89/14/04088914.pdf (last accessed 13.1.06)
Holloway F, Szmukler G, Sullivan D (2000) Involuntary outpatient treatment. Curr Opin Psych 13:689–692
Kisely S, Campbell LA, Preston N (2005) Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD004408. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004408.pub2
Preston NJ, Kisely S, Xiao J (2002) Assessing the outcome of compulsory psychiatric treatment in the community: epidemiological study in Western Australia. Br Med J 324:1244
STATA Statistical Software (2002) Release 7.0. STATA Corporation. College Station, Texas
Steadman HJ, Gounis KL, Dennis D, et al. (2001) Assessing the New York City Involuntary Outpatient Commitment Pilot Program. Psych Serv 52:330–336
Swartz MS, Swanson JW, Hiday VA, et al. (2001) A randomised controlled trial of outpatient commitment in North Carolina. Psych Serv 52:325–329
Swartz MS, Swanson JW, Wagner HR, et al. (2001) Effects of involuntary outpatient commitment and depot anti-psychotics on treatment adherence in persons with severe mental illness. J Nerv Ment Dis 189(9):583–591
Sytema S, Burgess P (1999) Continuity of care, readmission and service consumption of patients with schizophrenia and related disorders in Victoria and Groningen: a comparative case-register study. Acta Psych Scand 100:212–219
Szmukler G, Hotopf M (2001) Effectiveness of involuntary outpatient commitment [letter]. Am J Psychiatry 158(4):653–654
Acknowledgements
The project was conducted while Philip Burgess was Head, Policy and Analysis Group at the Mental Health Research Institute of Victoria.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burgess, P., Bindman, J., Leese, M. et al. Do community treatment orders for mental illness reduce readmission to hospital?. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 41, 574–579 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-006-0063-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-006-0063-1