Abstract
It is often found that heterosis tends to increase with genetic distance of the parents, though the correlation is not usually very close. It is therefore important to test the null hypothesis that the correlation is zero. The present work shows that standard procedures tend to yield too liberal tests, owing to the lack of independence among genetic distances and among heterosis estimates. A valid alternative is to use a permutation test, which was first suggested by Mantel [(1967) Cancer Res 27: 209–220). This test is well-known among plant breeders and geneticists, who often use it to test the correlation among two distance matrices. Its use is not restricted to the comparison of distance matrices. This is demonstrated in the present work, using two published datasets on marker-based genetic distances of maize inbreds or populations and heterosis of their crosses. It is shown that the test is also applicable in the presence of missing data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barbosa NJF, Neto JF, Sorrells ME, Cisar G (1996) Prediction of heterosis in wheat using coefficient of parentage and RFLP-based estimates of genetic relationship. Genome 39:1142–1149
Barbosa AMM, Geraldi IO, Benchimol LL, Garcia AAF, Souza CL, Souza AP (2003) Relationship of intra- and interpopulation tropical maize single cross hybrid performance and genetic distances computed from AFLP and SSR markers. Euphytica 130:87–99
Betran FJ, Ribaut JM, Beck D, de Leon DG (2003) Genetic diversity, specific combining ability, and heterosis in tropical maize under stress and nonstress environments. Crop Sci 43:797–806
Charcosset A, Essioux L (1994) The effect of population-structure on the relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci. Theor Appl Genet 89:336–343
Drinic SM, Trifunovic S, Drinic G, Konstantinov K (2002) Genetic divergence and its correlation to heterosis in maize as revealed by SSR-based markers. Maydica 47:1–8
Dutilleul P, Stockwell JD, Frigon D, Legendre P (2000) The Mantel test versus Pearson’s correlation analysis: assessment of the difference for biological and environmental studies. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 5:131–150
Girke A, Engqvist G, Becker HC (2001) Predicting heterosis from genetic distances for RFLP markers in resynthesized oilseed rape. In: Gallais A, Dillmann C, Goldringer I (eds) Quantitative genetics and breeding methods: the way ahead. Proceedings of the 11th Meeting of the EUCARPIA section biometrics in plant breeding, Paris, France, 30–31 August–1 September 2000, pp 257–262
Good IJ (2000) Permutation tests: a practical guide to resampling methods for testing hypotheses, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Gopal J, Minocha JL (1997) Genetic divergence for cross prediction in potato. Euphytica 97:269–275
Joyce TA, Abberton MT, Michaelson-Yeates TPT, Forster JW (1999) Relationships between genetic distance measured by RAPD-PCR and heterosis in inbred lines of white clover (Trifolium repens L.). Euphytica 107:159–165
Kwon SJ, Ahn SN, Jeong EG, Jeon YH, Hwang HG, Choi HC, Moon-HP (2002a) Relationship between genetic divergence and hybrid performance in japonica rice grown in a cold water-irrigated field. Euphytica 128:389–396
Kwon SJ, Ha WG, Hwang HG, Yang SJ, Choi HC, Moon HP, Ahn SN (2002b) Relationship between heterosis and genetic divergence in “Tongil”-type rice. Plant Breed 121:487–492
Lanza LLB, Souza CL, Ottoboni LMM, Vieira MLC, Souza AP (1997) Genetic distance of inbred lines and prediction of maize single-cross performance using RAPD markers. Theor Appl Genet 94:1023–1030
Manly BFJ (1997) Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, New York
Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220
Maroof MAS, Yang GP, Zhang QF, Gravois KA (1997) Correlation between molecular marker distance and hybrid performance in U.S. southern long grain rice. Crop Sci 37:145–150
Melchinger AE (1999) Genetic diversity and heterosis. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. Proceedings of an international symposium, CIMMYT, Mexico City, Mexico, 17–22 August 1997. Crop Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp 99–118
Meng A, Gong G, Chen D, Zhang H, Qi S, Tang H, Gao Z (1996) DNA fingerprint variability within and among parental lines and its correlation with performance of F1 laying hens. Theor Appl Genet 92:769–776
Parentoni SN, Magalhaes JV, Pacheco CAP, Santos MX, Abadie T, Gama EEG, Guimaraes PEO, Meirelles WF, Lopes MA, Vasconcelos MJV, Paiva E (2001) Heterotic groups based on yield-specific combining ability data and phylogenetic relationship determined by RAPD markers for 28 tropical maize open pollinated varieties. Euphytica 121:197–208
Reif JC, Melchinger AE, Xia XC, Warburton ML, Hoisington DA, Vasal SK, Srinivasan G, Bohn M, Frisch M (2003a) Genetic distance based on simple sequence repeats and heterosis in tropical maize populations. Crop Sci 43:1275–1282
Reif JC, Melchinger AE, Xia XC, Warburton ML, Hoisington DA, Vasal SK, Beck D, Bohn M, Frisch M (2003b) Use of SSRs for establishing heterotic groups in subtropical maize. Theor Appl Genet 197:947–957
Riaz A, Li G, Quresh Z, Swati MS, Quiros CF (2001) Genetic diversity of oilseed Brassica napus inbred lines based on sequence-related amplified polymorphism and its relation to hybrid performance. Plant Breed 120:411–415
Rohlf FJ (1998) NTSYS-pc: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2.0. Exeter Software, Setauket
Sant VJ, Patankar AG, Sarode ND, Mhase LB, Sainani MN, Deshmukh RB, Ranjekar PK, Gupta VS (1999) Potential of DNA markers in detecting divergence and in analysing heterosis in Indian elite chickpea cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 98:1217–1225
Shieh GJ, Thseng FS (2002) Genetic diversity of Tainan-white maize inbred lines and prediction of single cross hybrid performance using RAPD markers. Euphytica 124:307–313
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. WH Freeman, New York
Xiao J, Li J, Yuan L, McCouch SR, Tanksley SD (1996) Genetic diversity and its relationship to hybrid performance and heterosis in rice as revealed by PCR-based markers. Theor Appl Genet 92:637–643
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by H. C. Becker
Appendix
Appendix
Using results on the distribution of linear functions of random variables, it is straightforward to see that heterosis estimates involving the same parent are stochastically dependent. For example, consider two mid-parant heterosis estimates h ij =z ij –(y i +y j )/2 (parents i and j) and hik=zik–(y i +y k )/2 (parents i and k), where z ij , z ik , y i , y j , and y k are independent normal deviates with constant variance. The correlation of h ij and h ik is 1/6, so the two estimates are stochastically dependent.
Here is a simple example demonstrating that genetic distances involving the same parent are stochastically dependent. Assume that three lines i, j, and k are selected at random from a population of inbred lines, and consider a single locus with alleles a1 und a2. Let p be the allele frequency of a1 and q the allele frequency of a2 and define a dummy variable, w, indexed by parents. For example, w i =0 when parent i is homozygous for allele a1 and w i =1 when parent i is homozygous for allele a2. The Euclidean distances of the three parents at the locus are d ij =|w i -w j |, d ik =|w i -w k |, and d jk =|w j -wk|. Table 4 gives the joint distribution of the three pairwise distances. To see that the distances are stochastically dependent, consider the conditional probability of the event d ij =0, given that d ik =1, P(d ij =0|d ik =1)=(p2 q+pq2)/(p2 q+pq2+p2 q+pq2)=0.5, and the marginal probability of the event d ij =0, P(d ij =0)=p3+p2 q+pq3+q3. Under stochastical independence, both probabilities must be equal. Obviously, P(d ij =0|d ik =1) ≠ P(d ij =0) when p≠q, in which case the distances d ij and dik are stochastically dependent. For example, when p=0.7, one finds P(d ij =0)=0.58≠0.5=P(d ij =0|dik=1).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Piepho, H.P. Permutation tests for the correlation among genetic distances and measures of heterosis. Theor Appl Genet 111, 95–99 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-1995-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-1995-7