Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic basis of heterosis explored by simple sequence repeat markers in a random-mated maize population

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The genetic basis of heterosis in crop plants has not been completely resolved. Our objective in this study was to determine the level of dominance for quantitative trait loci (QTLs) that underlie heterosis in maize (Zea mays L.). An F2 population of an elite maize single cross, LH200 × LH216, was random mated for three generations in an attempt to break up repulsion linkages that might lead to pseudo-overdominance. The population was analyzed with 160 simple-sequence repeat markers. Phenotypic data analyses indicated overdominance for grain yield and partial dominance for plant height, grain moisture and stalk lodging. A total of 28 QTLs were identified for grain yield, 16 for grain moisture, 8 for stalk lodging, and 11 for plant height. For grain yield, 24 QTLs (86%) showed overdominance. In contrast, most of the QTLs for plant height, grain moisture and stalk lodging showed partial to complete dominance. Little epistasis was detected among the QTLs for any of the traits. Our results can be interpreted in one of two ways, or a combination of both: (1) QTLs for grain yield in maize exhibit true overdominance, or (2) QTLs for grain yield show partial to complete dominance, but they are so tightly linked such that three generations of random mating failed to separate their individual effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basten CJ, Weir BS, Zeng ZB (1998) QTL Cartographer version 1.13. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA

  • Bingham ET (1998) Role of chromosome blocks in heterosis and estimates of dominance and overdominance. In: Lamkey KR, Staub JE (eds) Concepts and breeding of heterosis in crop plants. Crop Sci Soc Am, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp 71–87

  • Churchill GA, Doerge RW (1994) Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138:963–971

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran WG, Cox GM (1950) Experimental designs. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York

  • Cockerham CC, Zeng ZB (1996) Design III with marker loci. Genetics 143:1437–1456

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Comstock RE, Robinson HF (1948) The components of genetic variance in populations. Biometrics 4:254–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow JF (1999) Dominance and overdominance. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) Genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. Am Soc Agron, Crop Sci Soc Am, Soil Sci Soc Am, Inc, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp 49–58

  • Davenport CB (1908) Degeneration, albinism and inbreeding. Science 28:454–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkhuizen A, Dudley JW, Rocheford TR (1996) Marker-QTL linkages estimated using F2 and random-mated generations. Illinois Corn Breeders School 32:144–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn LC, Landauer W (1934) The genetics of the rumpless fowl with evidence of a case of changing dominance. J Genet 29:217–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvick DN (1999) Heterosis: feeding people and protecting natural resources. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) Genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. Am Soc Agron, Crop Sci Soc Am, Soil Sci Soc Am, Inc, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp 19–29

  • East EM (1908) Inbreeding in corn. Rep Connecticut Agric Exp Stn for 1907, pp 419–428

  • Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Ltd, Edinburgh Gate, Harlow, England

  • Fisher RA (1928) The possible modifications of the response of the wild-type to recurrent mutations. Am Nat 62:115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford EB (1940) Genetic research in the Lepidoptera. Ann Eugen 10:227–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner CO (1963) Estimates of genetic parameters in cross-fertilizing plants and their implications in plant breeding. In: Hanson WD, Robinson HF (eds) Stat genet and plant breed. NAS-NRC Publ 982, Washington DC, pp 225–252

  • Graham GI, Wolff DW, Stuber CW (1997) Characterization of a yield quantitative trait locus on chromosome five of maize by fine mapping. Crop Sci 37:1601–1610

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harland SC (1936) The genetical conception of the species. Biol Rev 11:83–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfer RG (1939) Dominance modifiers of scute in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 24:278–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones DF (1917) Dominance of linked factors as a means of accounting for heterosis. Genetics 2:466–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacser H, Burns JA (1981) The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 97:639–666

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kettlewell HBD (1965) Insect survival and selection for pattern. Science 148:1290–1296

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander ES, Bostein D (1989) Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121:185–199

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln S, Daly MJ, Lander ES (1992) Constructing genetic linkage maps with MAPMAKER/EXP version 3.0b. Whitehead Inst Tech Rep, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

  • Lu H, Romero-Severson J, Bernardo R (2002) Chromosomal regions associated with segregation distortion in maize. Theor Appl Genet 105:622–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA

  • Mackay TFC (2001) The genetic architecture of quantitative traits. Annu Rev Genet 35:303–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf AJ (1952) Gene interaction in heterosis. In: Gowen JW (ed) Heterosis. Iowa State College Press, Ames, Iowa, USA, pp 321–329

  • MBS, Inc (1999) Genetic handbook, 26th edn. MBS, Inc, Story City, Iowa, USA

  • Rhodes D, Ju GC, Yang W-J, Samaras Y (1992) Plant metabolism and heterosis. Plant Breed Rev 10:53–91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW (1984) Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphism in barley: mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:8014–8018

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shull GH (1908) The composition of a field of maize. Rep Am Breeders Assoc 4:296–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuber CW, Lincoln SE, Wolff DW, Helentjaris T, Lander ES (1992) Indentification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132:823–839

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao J, Li J, Yuan L, Tanksley SD (1995) Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics 140:745–754

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yu SB, Li JX, Xu CG, Tan YF, Gao YJ, Li XH, Zhang QF, Saghai Maroof MA (1997) Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:9226–9231

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements.

This research was funded by Holden's Foundation Seeds and Monsanto. We gratefully acknowledge the support provided by Drs. Jeff Maughan, Robert Reiter, Thomas Ruff and Lance Veldboom.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Bernardo.

Additional information

Communicated by H.C. Becker

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lu, H., Romero-Severson, J. & Bernardo, R. Genetic basis of heterosis explored by simple sequence repeat markers in a random-mated maize population. Theor Appl Genet 107, 494–502 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1271-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1271-7

Keywords.

Navigation