Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nutzen und Risiko von früher vs. später Ureterstententfernung nach Nierentransplantation

Benefits and risks of early versus late ureteric stent removal after kidney transplantation

  • Evidenzbasierte Medizin
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Montgomery JR, Berger JC, Warren DS, James NT, Montgomery RA, Segev DL (2012) Outcomes of AB0-incompatible kidney transplantation in the United States. Transplantation 93:603–609

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bardapure M, Sharma A, Hammad A (2014) Forgotten ureteric stents in renal transplant recepients: three case reports. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 25:109–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wingate JT, Brandenberger J, Weiss A, Scovel LG (2017) Ureteral stent duration and the risk of BK polyomavirus viremia or bacteriuria after kidney transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.12644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Caskurlu H, Karadag FY, Arslan F, Cag Y, Vahaboglu H (2018) Comparison of universal prophylaxis and preemptive approach for CMV associated outcome measures in renal transplant patients: a meta-analysis of available data. Transpl Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.13016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu S, Luo G, Sun B, Lu J, Zu Q, Yang S, Zhang X, Dong J (2017) Early removal of double-J stents decreases urinary tract infections in living donor renal transplantation: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Transplant Proc 49:297–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yahav D, Green H, Eliakim-Raz N, Mor E, Hussain S (2018) Early double J stent removal in renal transplant patients to prevent urinary tract infection—systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 37:773–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Innere Medizin C – Hämatologie/Onkologie/Transplantationszentrum, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruchstraße, 17475, Greifswald, Deutschland

    Laila Schneidewind FEBU

  2. UroEvidence@Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie, Nestorstraße 8/9, 10709, Berlin, Deutschland

    Laila Schneidewind FEBU

Authors
  1. Laila Schneidewind FEBU
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laila Schneidewind FEBU.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

L. Schneidewind gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

Die Zusammenfassung ist eine Übersetzung des Abstracts der Originalpublikation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schneidewind, L. Nutzen und Risiko von früher vs. später Ureterstententfernung nach Nierentransplantation. Urologe 58, 168–171 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-019-0856-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-019-0856-y

Search

Navigation