Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Venöse Interventionen – Teil 1: Interventionstechniken und Thrombosen der Bein- und Beckenvenen

Venous interventions – Part 1: techniques and lower torso thromboses

  • CME Weiterbildung • Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Der Radiologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Venöse Thrombosen zählen zu den häufigsten Gefäßerkrankungen. Unbehandelt können sie zu lebensbedrohlichen Lungenarterienembolien führen. Spätfolgen sind chronisch venöse Insuffizienz und postthrombotisches Syndrom. Die medikamentöse Antikoagulation ist derzeit die Standardtherapie, sie verhindert in erster Linie ein appositionelles Thrombuswachstum, kann aber die Entstehung eines postthrombotischen Syndroms meist nicht verhindern. Durch die Thrombusorganisation kommt es häufig zu einer partiellen Rekanalisation mit Residualstenosen und Klappenfunktionsstörung. Die systemische Thrombolyse kann bei zeitnahem Einsatz und ausreichender Konzentration eine Thrombusauflösung mit Klappenfunktionserhalt bewirken. Als Ergänzung zur konventionellen Therapie ist die lokale Katheterthrombolyse auch bei kontraindizierter systemischer Lyse in der Lage, eine Revaskularisation zu erzielen. Durch mechanische Verfahren lässt sich die Menge des benötigten Thrombolytikums weiter reduzieren. Venöse Stenosen lassen sich mittels Ballondilatation und Stentimplantation behandeln. Dieser Artikel behandelt die einzelnen perkutanen Therapieoptionen und ihren Einsatz bei der Behandlung von Thrombosen der unteren Körperhälfte.

Abstract

Venous thrombosis is one of the most common vascular diseases. Without treatment, pulmonary embolism is a potentially life-threatening complication. Long-term complications are chronic venous insufficiency and post-thrombotic syndrome. Medical anticoagulation is currently the standard therapy, since it prevents appositional thrombus growth although it usually can not prevent the development of post-thrombotic syndrome. The structure of the thrombotic material often leads to partial recanalisation with residual stenosis. Early and sufficient systemic thrombolysis with adequate concentration may achieve disintegration of the thrombus and preservation of venous valve function. Supplementary to conservative therapy, local catheter thrombolysis is possible even in cases with contraindications for a systemic thrombolysis therapy. Additional interventional techniques reduce the required concentration of the thrombolytic. Venous stenosis can be treated by balloon angioplasty and stent implantation. This article reviews the different percutaneous treatment options as well as their application and usefulness in thrombosis of the lower torso.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Kearon C (2001) Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Semin Vasc Med 1: 7–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Markel A, Manzo RA, Strandness DE Jr (1992) The potential role of thrombolytic therapy in venous thrombosis. Arch Intern Med 152: 1265–1267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Snow V, Qaseem A, Barry P et al. (2007) Management of venous thromboembolism: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians. Ann Intern Med 146: 204–210

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schulman S, Granqvist S, Juhlin-Dannfelt A, Lockner D (1986) Long-term sequelae of calf vein thrombosis treated with heparin or low-dose streptokinase. Acta Med Scand 219: 349–357

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Haage P, Günther RW (2005) Iliofemoral and iliocaval interventions in deep venous thrombosis. Rofo 177: 670–680

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mewissen MW, Seabrook GR, Meissner MH et al. (1999) Catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: report of a national multicenter registry. Radiology 211: 39–49

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vorwerk D (1999) Perkutane Interventionen bei Hämodialyseshunts. In: Günther RW, Thelen L (Hrsg) Interventionelle Radiologie. Stuttgart

  8. Sharafuddin MJ, Hicks ME (1998) Current status of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy. Part II. Devices and mechanisms of action. J Vasc Interv Radiol 9: 15–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharafuddin MJ, Hicks ME (1997) Current status of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy. Part I. General principles. J Vasc Interv Radiol 8: 911–921

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vedantham S, Vesely TM, Parti N et al. (2002) Lower extremity venous thrombolysis with adjunctive mechanical thrombectomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13: 1001–1008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Morgan R, Belli AM (2002) Percutaneous thrombectomy: a review. Eur Radiol 12: 205–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McLennan G, Trerotola SO, Davidson D et al. (2001) The effects of a mechanical thrombolytic device on normal canine vein valves. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12: 89–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vedantham S, Vesely TM, Sicard GA et al. (2004) Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis and early stent placement for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15: 565–574

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Truong TH, Spuentrup E, Staatz G et al. (2004) Mechanical thrombectomy of iliocaval thrombosis using a protective expandable sheath. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 27: 254–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. PREPIC Study Group (2005) Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d’Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study. Circulation 112: 416–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Haage P, Krings T, Schmitz-Rode T (2002) Nontraumatic vascular emergencies: imaging and intervention in acute venous occlusion. Eur Radiol 12: 2627–2643

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim V, Spandorfer J (2001) Epidemiology of venous thromboembolic disease. Emerg Med Clin North Am 19: 839–859

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Oguzkurt L, Tercan F, Pourbagher MA et al. (2005) Computed tomography findings in 10 cases of iliac vein compression (May-Thurner) syndrome. Eur J Radiol 55: 421–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldhaber SZ, Meyerovitz MF, Green D et al. (1990) Randomized controlled trial of tissue plasminogen activator in proximal deep venous thrombosis. Am J Med 88: 235–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Witty LA, Krichman A, Tapson VF (1994) Thrombolytic therapy for venous thromboembolism. Utilization by practicing pulmonologists. Arch Intern Med 154: 1601–1604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Kamper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kamper, L., Krüger, K., Altenburg, A. et al. Venöse Interventionen – Teil 1: Interventionstechniken und Thrombosen der Bein- und Beckenvenen. Radiologe 49, 257–268 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-008-1737-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-008-1737-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation