Skip to main content
Log in

Trachealkanülen(TK)-Management, TK-Weaning und Versorgungsaspekte in der Dysphagietherapie

Tracheostomy managment and tube weaning within a framework of dysphagia intervention

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Nervenarzt Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Persistierende Dysphagien sind ein wesentlicher Prädiktor für prolongiertes Beatmungsweaning und erfolglose Dekanülierungsversuche. Aufgrund der hohen Dysphagieinzidenz bei Tracheotomierten müssen Trachealkanülen(TK)-Management und Dysphagietherapie koordiniert erfolgen. Zentrales Element für das TK-Management in der Dysphagietherapie ist die Herstellung physiologischer Luftstromführung. Diese ermöglicht willkürliche Reinigungsfunktionen wie Husten und Räuspern und verringert signifikant die Aspiration. Es wird unterschieden zwischen spontanen und gestaffelten Dekanülierungspfaden mit Ausbau der Cuff-Entblockungszeiten und Okklusionstraining. Weitere therapeutische Maßnahmen sind Sekret- und Speichelmanagement, Training der Hustenfunktion mit Verbesserung von Kraft und Sensibilität, pharyngeale Elektrostimulation, TK-Anpassung zur Optimierung der Atem- und Schluckfunktion, Kontrolle und Therapie von Atemwegsstenosen sowie die Standardisierung von Prozessen zur Qualitätssicherung.

Abstract

Persistent dysphagia is a major predictor of prolonged ventilation weaning and unsuccessful attempts at decannulation. Due to the high incidence of dysphagia in tracheotomized patients, tracheal cannula management and dysphagia treatment must be coordinated. A central element of tracheal cannula management in dysphagia treatment is the establishment of physiological airflow. This enables voluntary clearing functions, such as coughing and throat clearing and significantly reduces aspiration. A distinction is made between spontaneous and staged decannulation pathways with expansion of cuff unblocking times and occlusion training. Other therapeutic measures include secretion and saliva management, cough function training with improvement of strength and sensitivity, pharyngeal electrical stimulation, adaptation of tracheal tubes to optimize respiratory and swallowing function, control and treatment of airway stenosis, and standardization of processes for quality assurance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Literatur

  1. Pohl M, Bertram M, Bucka C, Hartwich M, Jöbges M, Ketter G, Leineweber B, Mertl-Rötzer M, Nowak D, Platz T (2016) Rehabilitationsverlauf von Patienten in der neurologisch-neurochirurgischen Frührehabilitation. Der Nervenarzt, 87(6):634–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-016-0093-1

  2. Schönhofer B et al (2019) Prolongiertes weaning. Pneumologie 73(12):723–814

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ponfick M, Linden R, Nowak DA (2015) Dysphagia—a common, transient symptom in critical illness polyneuropathy: a fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing study. Crit Care Med 43(2):365–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dziewas R, Pflug C, Allescher H (2020) Neurogene Dysphagie, S1-Leitlinie. In: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie (Hrsg) Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bartolome G, Schröter-Morasch H (2022) Schluckstörungen – Interdisziplinäre Diagnostik und Rehabilitation. Elsevier, München

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cameron J, Reynolds J, Zuidema G (1973) Aspiration in patients with tracheostomies. Surg Gynecol Obstet 136(1):68–70

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bechet S et al (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of the modified Evan’s blue dye test in detecting aspiration in patients with tracheostomy: a systematic review of the evidence. Dysphagia 31(6):721–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Skoretz SA et al (2020) Investigating swallowing and tracheostomy following critical illness: a scoping review. Crit Care Med 48(2):e141–e151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ledl C, Ullrich YY (2017) Occlusion of tracheostomy tubes does not alter pharyngeal phase kinematics but reduces penetration by enhancing pharyngeal clearance: a prospective study in patients with neurogenic dysphagia. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 96(4):268–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Heidler M (2007) Rehabilitation schwerer pharyngo-laryngo-trachealer Sensibilitätsstörungen bei neurologischen Patienten mit geblockter Trachealkanüle. Neurol Rehabil 13(1):3–14

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schwegler H (2022) Trachealkanülenmanagement: In sicheren Schritten Richtung Dekanülierung. Schulz-Kirchner

    Google Scholar 

  12. Whitmore KA, Townsend SC, Laupland KB (2020) Management of tracheostomies in the intensive care unit: a scoping review. BMJ Open Resp Res 7(1):e651

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Winklmaier U et al (2006) Leakage of fluid in different types of tracheal tubes. Dysphagia 21(4):237–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blot SI, Rello J, Koulenti D (2016) The value of polyurethane-cuffed endotracheal tubes to reduce microaspiration and intubation-related pneumonia: a systematic review of laboratory and clinical studies. Crit Care 20(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pannunzio TG (1996) Aspiration of oral feedings in patients with tracheostomies. AACN Adv Crit Care 7(4):560–569

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Prigent H et al (2006) Characteristics of tracheostomy phonation valves. Eur Respir J 27(5):992–996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bach JR, Saporito LR (1996) Criteria for extubation and tracheostomy tube removal for patients with ventilatory failure. A different approach to weaning. Chest 110:1566–1671

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ledl C, Ullrich YY (2022) Management von Schluckstörungen auf der Intensivstation. In: Bartolome G, Schröter-Morasch H (Hrsg) Schluckstörungen – Interdisziplinäre Diagnostik und Rehabilitation. Elsevier, München

    Google Scholar 

  19. Steffen A et al (2019) Hypersalivation: update of the German S2k guideline (AWMF) in short form. J Neural Transm 126:853–862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Duan J et al (2015) Semiquantitative cough strength score for predicting reintubation after planned extubation. Am J Crit Care 24(6):e86–e90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kutchak FM et al (2015) Reflex cough PEF as a predictor of successful extubation in neurological patients. J Bras Pneumol 41:358–364

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Suntrup S et al (2015) Electrical pharyngeal stimulation for dysphagia treatment in tracheotomized stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 41(9):1629–1637

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dziewas R et al (2018) Pharyngeal electrical stimulation for early decannulation in tracheotomised patients with neurogenic dysphagia after stroke (PHAST-TRAC): a prospective, single-blinded, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 17(10):849–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Warnecke T et al (2013) Standardized endoscopic swallowing evaluation for tracheostomy decannulation in critically ill neurologic patients. Crit Care Med 41(7):1728–1732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Warnecke T et al (2020) Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the “standardized endoscopic swallowing evaluation for tracheostomy decannulation in critically ill neurologic patients”. Neurol Res Pract 2:9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Santus P et al (2014) A systematic review on tracheostomy decannulation: a proposal of a quantitative semiquantitative clinical score. BMC Pulm Med 14(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Farrell MS, Gillin TM, Emberger JS, Getchell J, Caplan RJ, Cipolle MD, Bradley KM (2019) Improving tracheostomy decannulation rate in trauma patients. Critical care explorations, 1(7):e0022. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000022

  28. Singh RK, Saran S, Baronia AK (2017) The practice of tracheostomy decannulation—a systematic review. J Intensive Care 5:38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Muhle P et al (2021) Standardized endoscopic swallowing evaluation for tracheostomy decannulation in critically ill neurologic patients—a prospective evaluation. Neurol Res Pract 3(1):26

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. de Medeiros GC et al (2019) Criteria for tracheostomy decannulation: literature review. Codas. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20192018228 (SciELO Brasil)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bishnoi T, Sahu PK, Arjun A (2020) Evaluation of factors determining tracheostomy decannulation failure rate in adults: an Indian perspective descriptive study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 74(S3):4849–4854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-01982

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ledl C, Wagner-Sonntag E (2016) Highway to decanulation: a bi-center analysis of decanulation rates and causes of weaning failure. Dysphagia 31:250–338

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schönhofer B et al (2014) Prolongiertes weaning. Pneumologie 68(01):19–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Perin C et al (2017) Parameters influencing tracheostomy decannulation in patients undergoing rehabilitation after severe acquired brain injury (sABI). Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 21:382–389

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Troche M et al (2010) Aspiration and swallowing in Parkinson disease and rehabilitation with EMST: a randomized trial. Neurology 75(21):1912–1919

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Gundogdu I et al (2017) Implementation of a respiratory rehabilitation protocol: weaning from the ventilator and tracheostomy in difficult-to-wean patients with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 39(12):1162–1170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Epstein SK (2005) Late complications of tracheostomy. Respir Care 50(4):542–549

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ledl C, Mertl-Roetzer M (2009) Tracheal and tracheostomal hypergranulation and related stenosis in long-term cannulated patients: does the tracheostomy procedure make a difference? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 118(12):876–880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Ledl M.A..

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

C. Ledl, U. Frank und Y.Y. Ullrich geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autor/-innen keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

figure qr

Zusatzmaterial online – bitte QR-Code scannen

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ledl, C., Frank, U. & Ullrich, Y.Y. Trachealkanülen(TK)-Management, TK-Weaning und Versorgungsaspekte in der Dysphagietherapie. Nervenarzt 94, 694–701 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-023-01489-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-023-01489-1

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation