Abstract
Copulation in the blue-tailed damselfly, Ischnura elegans, can last over 5 hours, during which the pair may fly from place to place in the so-called “wheel position”. We filmed copulatory free-flight and analyzed the wingbeat kinematics of males and females in order to understand the contribution of the two sexes to this cooperative flight form. Both sexes flapped their wings but at different flapping frequencies resulting in a lack of synchronization between the flapping of the two insects. Despite their unusual body posture, females flapped their wings in a stroke-plane not significantly different to that of the males (repeated-measures ANOVA, F1,7 = 0.154, p = 0.71). However, their flapping amplitudes were smaller by 42 ± 17 %, compared to their male mates (t test, t 7 = 9.298, p < 0.001). This was mostly due to shortening of the amplitude at the ventral stroke reversal point. Compared to solitary flight, males flying in copula increased flapping frequency by 19 %, while females decreased flapping amplitude by 27 %. These findings suggest that although both sexes contribute to copulatory flight, females reduce their effort, while males increase their aerodynamic output in order to carry both their own weight and some of the female’s weight. This increased investment by the male is amplified due to male I. elegans being typically smaller than females. The need by smaller males to fly while carrying some of the weight of their larger mates may pose a constraint on the ability of mating pairs to evade predators or counter interference from competing solitary males.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcock J (1981) Seduction on the wing. Nat Hist 90:36–41
Alexander DE (1984) Unusual phase relationships between the forewings and hindwings in flying dragonflies. J Exp Biol 109:379–383
Andrés J, Cordero Rivera A (2000) Copulation duration and fertilization success in a damselfly: an example of cryptic female choice? Anim Behav 59:695–703
Anholt BR, Marden JH, Jenkins DM (1991) Pattern of mass gain and sexual dimorphism in adult dragonflies (Insecta : Odonata). Can J Zool 69:1156–1163
Corbet PS (1980) Biology of Odonata. Annu Rev Entomol 25:189–217
Cordoba-Aguilar A, Cordero-Rivera A (2005) Evolution and ecology of Calopterygidae ( Zygoptera : Odonata ): status of knowledge and research perspectives. Neotrop Entomol 34:861–879
Ellington CP (1999) The novel aerodynamics of insect flight: applications to micro-air vehicles. J Exp Biol 202:3439–3448
Fincke OM, Waage JK, Koenig WD (1997) Natural and sexual selection components of Odonate mating patterns. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) In the evolution of mating systems in insects and archnids. Cambridge, Cambridge, pp. 58–74
Grabow K, Rüppell G (1995) Wing loading in relation to size and flight characteristics of European odonata. Odonatologica 24:175–186
Gravish N, Peters JM, Combes S a, Wood RJ (2015) Collective flow enhancement by tandem flapping wings. Phys Rev Lett 115:1–5
Grodnitsky DL, Morozov PP (1993) Vortex formation during tethered flight of functionally and morphologically two-winged insects, including evolutionary considerations on insect flight. J Exp Biol 182:11–40
Hedrick TL (2008) Software techniques for two- and three-dimensional kinematic measurements of biological and biomimetic systems. Bioinspir Biomim 3:034001
Hefler, C., Qiu, H. and Shyy, W. (2014). The interaction of wings in different flight modes of a dragonfly. 17th Int. Symp. Appl. Laser Tech. fluid Mech. 7–10.
Hu Z, Deng X (2014) Aerodynamic interaction between forewing and hindwing of a hovering dragonfly. Acta Mech Sinica 30:787–799
Kassner Z, Dafni E, Ribak G (2016) Kinematic compensation for wing loss in flying damselflies. J Insect Physiol 85:1–9
Lehmann FO (2008) Wing–wake interaction reduces power consumption in insect tandem wings. Exp Fluids 46:765–775
Lin N (1966) Copulatory behaviour of the cicada killer wasp, Sphecius speciosus. Anim Behav 14:130–131
Lin N (1967) Role differentiation in copulating cicada killer wasps. Science 157:1334–1335
Marden JH (1987) Maximum lift production during takeoff in flying animals. J Exp Biol 130:235–238
Marden JH (1989a) Effects of load-lifting constraints on the mating system of a dance fly. Ecology 70:496–502
Marden JH (1989b) Bodybuilding dragonflies:costs and benefits of maximizing flight muscles. Physiol Zool 62:505–521
Maybury WJ, Lehmann FO (2004) The fluid dynamics of flight control by kinematic phase lag variation between two robotic insect wings. J Exp Biol 207:4707–4726
Miller PL (1987) An examination of the prolonged copulations pf Ischnura elegans (Vander Linden) (zygoptera: Coenagrionidae). Odonatologica 16:37–56
Miller PL, Miller CA (1981) Field observations on copulatory behaviour in the zygoptera with an examination of the structure and activity of the male genitalia. Odonatologica 10:201–218
Norberg RA (1975) Hovering flight of the dragonfly Aeschna juncea L., kinematics and aerodynamics. In: Wu TY, Brokaw CJ, Brennen C (eds) Flying and swimming in nature. Plenum Press, pp. 763–782
Robertson HM (1985) Female dimorphism and mating behaviour in a damselfly, Ischnura ramburi: females mimicking males. Anim Behav 33:805–809
Rüppell G (1989) Kinematic analysis of symmetrical flight manoeuvres of odonata. J Exp Biol 144:13–42
Rutowski RL (1980) Temporal variation in male copulatory behaviour in the solitary bee Nomadopsis puellae (Hymanoptera : andrenidae). Behaviour 73:175–187
Saharon, D. and Luttges, M. (1989). Dragonfly unsteady aerodynamics: the role of the wing phas relations in controlling the produced flows. AIAA, Aerosp. Sci. Meet. 27th. Reno, NV AIAA, 1989.
Sharp JL, Leppla NC, Bennett DR, Turner WK, Hamilton EW (1969) Flight ability of Plecia nearctica in the laboratory. Ann Entomol Soc Am 67:735–738
Shields O, Emmel JF (1973) A review of carrying pair behavior and mating times in butterflies. J Res Lepid 12:25–64
Somps C, Luttges M (1985) Dragonfly flight : novel uses of unsteady separated flows. Science 228:1326–1329
Taylor GK (2001) Mechanics and aerodynamics of insect flight control. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 76:449–471
Thornhill R (1975) Reproductive behavior of the lovebug, Plecia nearctica (Diptera : Bibionidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 69:843–847
Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press
Usherwood JR, Lehmann FO (2008) Phasing of dragonfly wings can improve aerodynamic efficiency by removing swirl. J R Soc Interface 5:1303–1307
Wang ZJ, Russell D (2007) Effect of forewing and hindwing interactions on aerodynamic forces and power in hovering dragonfly flight. Phys Rev Lett 99:1–4
Weis-Fogh T (1973) Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanisms for lift production. J Exp Biol 59:169–230
Acknowledgments
The authors thank E. Dafni for the invaluable assistance with various aspects of this work and with the preparation of Fig. 3 in particular. We also thank N. Paz for the English editing and Z. Kassner, Y. Meresman, and the staff of the I. Meier Segals Garden for Zoological Research for the logistical assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by: Sven Thatje
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davidovich, H., Ribak, G. Flying with eight wings: inter-sex differences in wingbeat kinematics and aerodynamics during the copulatory flight of damselflies (Ischnura elegans). Sci Nat 103, 65 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-016-1390-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-016-1390-z