Abstract
Introduction
Trauma teams (TTs) are a key tool in trauma care, as they bring a multidisciplinary approach to the trauma patient, improving outcomes. Excellent teamwork (TW) requires not only individual skills but also training at non-technical skills (NTS). Although there is evidence supporting TTs, there is little information regarding how they are organized and trained. With this study, we intend to assess the reality of TTs all over the world, focusing on how they are organized and trained.
Materials and methods
We composed a 42-question sheet on Google Forms, in four different languages (English, Polish, Portuguese, and Spanish). The questions regarded the respondents’ background, and their respective hospitals’ trauma patient management, TT features and its training, NTS and TW. The survey was shared on social media, through the International Assessment Group of Online Surgical & Trauma Education community, and the European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. Statistical analysis was performed on Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS®) version 27.
Results
We obtained 296 answers from 52 different countries, with 6 having at least 10 answers (Brazil, Portugal, Poland, Spain, Italy, and USA). While the majority of the respondents (97%) agreed that TTs can improve outcomes, only 61% have a TT in their hospital, with 69% of these being dedicated TTs. General surgery (76%), trauma surgery (68%), and anesthesia (66%) were the three most common specialties in the teams. Teams performed briefings and debriefings with a frequency of, at least, “often” in only 49% and 38%, respectively. Only 50% and 33% of the respondents stated that their hospital provided trauma management courses focusing on individual technical skills, and TT training courses, respectively. The Advanced Trauma Life Support (85%), the Definitive Surgical and Anesthetic Trauma Care (38%), and the European Trauma Course (31%) were the three trauma management courses of choice. Regarding TT training courses, the European Trauma Course (52%) and local/in-house (42%) courses were the most common ones. Most participants (93%) stated that NTS were highly important in trauma care. However, only 60% of the respondents had postgraduate training on NTS and TW, and only 24% had this type of training on an undergraduate level.
Conclusion
The number of TTs worldwide does not match their relevance in trauma care. Institutions are not providing enough trauma courses, particularly TT training courses and NTS teaching. Implementing TT should include promotion of team courses, as well as team briefings and debriefings.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The dataset used in the current study (SPSS file) is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- TT/TTs:
-
Trauma team/trauma teams
- TW:
-
Teamwork
- NTS:
-
Non-technical skills
- TL:
-
Team leader
- ATLS:
-
Advanced Trauma Life Support
- ETC:
-
European Trauma Course
- TS:
-
Trauma surgery
- DSATC:
-
Definitive Surgical and Anesthetic Trauma Care
- IAG-OSTE:
-
International Assessment Group of Online Surgical & Trauma Education
- ESTES:
-
European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
- EM:
-
Emergency medicine
- GS:
-
General surgery
- ER:
-
Emergency room
- DSTC:
-
Definitive Surgical Trauma Care
- DATC:
-
Definitive Anesthetic Trauma Care
References
WHO. Injuries and violence. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/injuries-and-violence.
Cowley RA. Trauma center. A new concept for the delivery of critical care. J Med Soc N J. 1977;74(11):979–87.
Clemmer TP, Orme JF Jr, Thomas FO, Brooks KA. Outcome of critically injured patients treated at Level I trauma centers versus full-service community hospitals. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):861–3.
Shatney CH. Initial resuscitation and assessment of patients with multisystem blunt trauma. South Med J. 1988;81(4):501–6.
West JG, Trunkey DD, Lim RC. Systems of trauma care. A study of two counties. Arch Surg. 1979;114(4):455–60.
West JG, Cales RH, Gazzaniga AB. Impact of regionalization. The Orange County experience. Arch Surg. 1983;118(6):740–4.
Driscoll PA, Vincent CA. Organizing an efficient trauma team. Injury. 1992;23(2):107–10.
Adedeji OA, Driscoll PA. The trauma team–a system of initial trauma care. Postgrad Med J. 1996;72(852):587–93.
TielGroenestege-Kreb D, van Maarseveen O, Leenen L. Trauma team. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113(2):258–65.
Hjortdahl M, Ringen AH, Naess AC, Wisborg T. Leadership is the essential non-technical skill in the trauma team–results of a qualitative study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009;17:48.
Pucher PH, Aggarwal R, Batrick N, Jenkins M, Darzi A. Nontechnical skills performance and care processes in the management of the acute trauma patient. Surgery. 2014;155(5):902–9.
Stahel PF, Cobianchi L, Dal Mas F, Paterson-Brown S, Sakakushev BE, Nguyen C, et al. The role of teamwork and non-technical skills for improving emergency surgical outcomes: an international perspective. Patient Saf Surg. 2022;16(1):8.
Ahmed JM, Tallon JM, Petrie DA. Trauma management outcomes associated with nonsurgeon versus surgeon trauma team leaders. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50(1):7–12 (e1).
Cummings GE, Mayes DC. A comparative study of designated Trauma Team Leaders on trauma patient survival and emergency department length-of-stay. CJEM. 2007;9(2):105–10.
Hartmann J, Gabram S, Jacobs L, Libby M. A model for an integrated emergency medicine/trauma service. Acad Emerg Med. 1996;3(12):1136–9.
Petrie D, Lane P, Stewart TC. An evaluation of patient outcomes comparing trauma team activated versus trauma team not activated using TRISS analysis. Trauma and Injury Severity Score. J Trauma. 1996;41(5):870–3 (discussion 3-5).
Gerardo CJ, Glickman SW, Vaslef SN, Chandra A, Pietrobon R, Cairns CB. The rapid impact on mortality rates of a dedicated care team including trauma and emergency physicians at an academic medical center. J Emerg Med. 2011;40(5):586–91.
Rainer TH, Cheung NK, Yeung JH, Graham CA. Do trauma teams make a difference? A single centre registry study. Resuscitation. 2007;73(3):374–81.
Ali J, Adam RU, Gana TJ, Williams JI. Trauma patient outcome after the Prehospital Trauma Life Support program. J Trauma. 1997;42(6):1018–21 (discussion 21-2).
van Olden GD, Meeuwis JD, Bolhuis HW, Boxma H, Goris RJ. Clinical impact of advanced trauma life support. Am J Emerg Med. 2004;22(7):522–5.
Mazzocco K, Petitti DB, Fong KT, Bonacum D, Brookey J, Graham S, et al. Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. Am J Surg. 2009;197(5):678–85.
Briggs A, Raja AS, Joyce MF, Yule SJ, Jiang W, Lipsitz SR, et al. The role of nontechnical skills in simulated trauma resuscitation. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(4):732–9.
Thies KC, Deakin CD, Lott C, Robinson D, Sabbe MB, Arafat R, et al. The European trauma course–trauma teaching goes European. Resuscitation. 2014;85(1):19–20.
Yánez Benítez C, Güemes A, Aranda J, Ribeiro M, Ottolino P, Di Saverio S, et al. Impact of personal protective equipment on surgical performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. World J Surg. 2020;44(9):2842–7.
Hietbrink F, Mohseni S, Mariani D, Naess PA, Rey-Valcárcel C, Biloslavo A, et al. What trauma patients need: the European dilemma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02014-w.
Lavigueur O, Nemeth J, Razek T, Maghraby N. The effect of a multidisciplinary trauma team leader paradigm at a tertiary trauma center: 10-year experience. Emerg Med Int. 2020;2020:8412179.
Steinemann S, Bhatt A, Suares G, Wei A, Ho N, Kurosawa G, et al. Trauma team discord and the role of briefing. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(1):184–9.
Walker CA, McGregor L, Taylor C, Robinson S. STOP5: a hot debrief model for resuscitation cases in the emergency department. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2020;7(4):259–66.
Kobusingye DO, Lett DR. Trauma Team Training course. https://www.cnis.ca/what-we-do/safer-communities-in-africa-program/trauma-team-training-course-ttt/.
Alexandrino H, Baptista S, Vale L, Júnior JHZ, Espada PC, Junior DS, et al. Improving intraoperative communication in trauma: the educational effect of the joint DSTC™-DATC™ courses. World J Surg. 2020;44(6):1856–62.
Edinburgh TRCoSo. Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) https://www.rcsed.ac.uk/professional-support-development-resources/learning-resources/non-technical-skills-for-surgeons-notss.
Acknowledgements
Mariana Pinto for her contribution with the artwork. Helena Carvalho and Victor Böhmeke Picallo for the Spanish survey translation. The authors would like to thank the Associação Lusitana de Trauma e Emergência Cirúrgica (ALTEC), the Sociedade Brasileira de Atendimento Integrado ao Traumatizado (SBAIT), and the European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) for the help sharing our survey internationally.
Funding
No funding or grant support was received for this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
André Bento, Luís Ferreira, Carlos Yánez, Piotr Koleda, Gustavo P. Fraga, Piotr Kozera, Sérgio Baptista, Carlos Mesquita, and Henrique Alexandrino have no conflict of interest in this manuscript.
Ethical standards
This article does not contain any experimental studies involving human or animal participants performed by any of the authors.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bento, A., Ferreira, L., Yánez Benitez, C. et al. Worldwide snapshot of trauma team structure and training: an international survey. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 49, 1771–1781 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02166-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02166-9