Skip to main content
Log in

Worldwide snapshot of trauma team structure and training: an international survey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Trauma teams (TTs) are a key tool in trauma care, as they bring a multidisciplinary approach to the trauma patient, improving outcomes. Excellent teamwork (TW) requires not only individual skills but also training at non-technical skills (NTS). Although there is evidence supporting TTs, there is little information regarding how they are organized and trained. With this study, we intend to assess the reality of TTs all over the world, focusing on how they are organized and trained.

Materials and methods

We composed a 42-question sheet on Google Forms, in four different languages (English, Polish, Portuguese, and Spanish). The questions regarded the respondents’ background, and their respective hospitals’ trauma patient management, TT features and its training, NTS and TW. The survey was shared on social media, through the International Assessment Group of Online Surgical & Trauma Education community, and the European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. Statistical analysis was performed on Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS®) version 27.

Results

We obtained 296 answers from 52 different countries, with 6 having at least 10 answers (Brazil, Portugal, Poland, Spain, Italy, and USA). While the majority of the respondents (97%) agreed that TTs can improve outcomes, only 61% have a TT in their hospital, with 69% of these being dedicated TTs. General surgery (76%), trauma surgery (68%), and anesthesia (66%) were the three most common specialties in the teams. Teams performed briefings and debriefings with a frequency of, at least, “often” in only 49% and 38%, respectively. Only 50% and 33% of the respondents stated that their hospital provided trauma management courses focusing on individual technical skills, and TT training courses, respectively. The Advanced Trauma Life Support (85%), the Definitive Surgical and Anesthetic Trauma Care (38%), and the European Trauma Course (31%) were the three trauma management courses of choice. Regarding TT training courses, the European Trauma Course (52%) and local/in-house (42%) courses were the most common ones. Most participants (93%) stated that NTS were highly important in trauma care. However, only 60% of the respondents had postgraduate training on NTS and TW, and only 24% had this type of training on an undergraduate level.

Conclusion

The number of TTs worldwide does not match their relevance in trauma care. Institutions are not providing enough trauma courses, particularly TT training courses and NTS teaching. Implementing TT should include promotion of team courses, as well as team briefings and debriefings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset used in the current study (SPSS file) is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

TT/TTs:

Trauma team/trauma teams

TW:

Teamwork

NTS:

Non-technical skills

TL:

Team leader

ATLS:

Advanced Trauma Life Support

ETC:

European Trauma Course

TS:

Trauma surgery

DSATC:

Definitive Surgical and Anesthetic Trauma Care

IAG-OSTE:

International Assessment Group of Online Surgical & Trauma Education

ESTES:

European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery

EM:

Emergency medicine

GS:

General surgery

ER:

Emergency room

DSTC:

Definitive Surgical Trauma Care

DATC:

Definitive Anesthetic Trauma Care

References

  1. WHO. Injuries and violence. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/injuries-and-violence.

  2. Cowley RA. Trauma center. A new concept for the delivery of critical care. J Med Soc N J. 1977;74(11):979–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Clemmer TP, Orme JF Jr, Thomas FO, Brooks KA. Outcome of critically injured patients treated at Level I trauma centers versus full-service community hospitals. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):861–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shatney CH. Initial resuscitation and assessment of patients with multisystem blunt trauma. South Med J. 1988;81(4):501–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. West JG, Trunkey DD, Lim RC. Systems of trauma care. A study of two counties. Arch Surg. 1979;114(4):455–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. West JG, Cales RH, Gazzaniga AB. Impact of regionalization. The Orange County experience. Arch Surg. 1983;118(6):740–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Driscoll PA, Vincent CA. Organizing an efficient trauma team. Injury. 1992;23(2):107–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Adedeji OA, Driscoll PA. The trauma team–a system of initial trauma care. Postgrad Med J. 1996;72(852):587–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. TielGroenestege-Kreb D, van Maarseveen O, Leenen L. Trauma team. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113(2):258–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hjortdahl M, Ringen AH, Naess AC, Wisborg T. Leadership is the essential non-technical skill in the trauma team–results of a qualitative study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009;17:48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Pucher PH, Aggarwal R, Batrick N, Jenkins M, Darzi A. Nontechnical skills performance and care processes in the management of the acute trauma patient. Surgery. 2014;155(5):902–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stahel PF, Cobianchi L, Dal Mas F, Paterson-Brown S, Sakakushev BE, Nguyen C, et al. The role of teamwork and non-technical skills for improving emergency surgical outcomes: an international perspective. Patient Saf Surg. 2022;16(1):8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmed JM, Tallon JM, Petrie DA. Trauma management outcomes associated with nonsurgeon versus surgeon trauma team leaders. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50(1):7–12 (e1).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cummings GE, Mayes DC. A comparative study of designated Trauma Team Leaders on trauma patient survival and emergency department length-of-stay. CJEM. 2007;9(2):105–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hartmann J, Gabram S, Jacobs L, Libby M. A model for an integrated emergency medicine/trauma service. Acad Emerg Med. 1996;3(12):1136–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Petrie D, Lane P, Stewart TC. An evaluation of patient outcomes comparing trauma team activated versus trauma team not activated using TRISS analysis. Trauma and Injury Severity Score. J Trauma. 1996;41(5):870–3 (discussion 3-5).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gerardo CJ, Glickman SW, Vaslef SN, Chandra A, Pietrobon R, Cairns CB. The rapid impact on mortality rates of a dedicated care team including trauma and emergency physicians at an academic medical center. J Emerg Med. 2011;40(5):586–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rainer TH, Cheung NK, Yeung JH, Graham CA. Do trauma teams make a difference? A single centre registry study. Resuscitation. 2007;73(3):374–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ali J, Adam RU, Gana TJ, Williams JI. Trauma patient outcome after the Prehospital Trauma Life Support program. J Trauma. 1997;42(6):1018–21 (discussion 21-2).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. van Olden GD, Meeuwis JD, Bolhuis HW, Boxma H, Goris RJ. Clinical impact of advanced trauma life support. Am J Emerg Med. 2004;22(7):522–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mazzocco K, Petitti DB, Fong KT, Bonacum D, Brookey J, Graham S, et al. Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. Am J Surg. 2009;197(5):678–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Briggs A, Raja AS, Joyce MF, Yule SJ, Jiang W, Lipsitz SR, et al. The role of nontechnical skills in simulated trauma resuscitation. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(4):732–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thies KC, Deakin CD, Lott C, Robinson D, Sabbe MB, Arafat R, et al. The European trauma course–trauma teaching goes European. Resuscitation. 2014;85(1):19–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yánez Benítez C, Güemes A, Aranda J, Ribeiro M, Ottolino P, Di Saverio S, et al. Impact of personal protective equipment on surgical performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. World J Surg. 2020;44(9):2842–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hietbrink F, Mohseni S, Mariani D, Naess PA, Rey-Valcárcel C, Biloslavo A, et al. What trauma patients need: the European dilemma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02014-w.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lavigueur O, Nemeth J, Razek T, Maghraby N. The effect of a multidisciplinary trauma team leader paradigm at a tertiary trauma center: 10-year experience. Emerg Med Int. 2020;2020:8412179.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Steinemann S, Bhatt A, Suares G, Wei A, Ho N, Kurosawa G, et al. Trauma team discord and the role of briefing. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(1):184–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Walker CA, McGregor L, Taylor C, Robinson S. STOP5: a hot debrief model for resuscitation cases in the emergency department. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2020;7(4):259–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kobusingye DO, Lett DR. Trauma Team Training course. https://www.cnis.ca/what-we-do/safer-communities-in-africa-program/trauma-team-training-course-ttt/.

  30. Alexandrino H, Baptista S, Vale L, Júnior JHZ, Espada PC, Junior DS, et al. Improving intraoperative communication in trauma: the educational effect of the joint DSTC™-DATC™ courses. World J Surg. 2020;44(6):1856–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Edinburgh TRCoSo. Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) https://www.rcsed.ac.uk/professional-support-development-resources/learning-resources/non-technical-skills-for-surgeons-notss.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Mariana Pinto for her contribution with the artwork. Helena Carvalho and Victor Böhmeke Picallo for the Spanish survey translation. The authors would like to thank the Associação Lusitana de Trauma e Emergência Cirúrgica (ALTEC), the Sociedade Brasileira de Atendimento Integrado ao Traumatizado (SBAIT), and the European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) for the help sharing our survey internationally.

Funding

No funding or grant support was received for this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Bento.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

André Bento, Luís Ferreira, Carlos Yánez, Piotr Koleda, Gustavo P. Fraga, Piotr Kozera, Sérgio Baptista, Carlos Mesquita, and Henrique Alexandrino have no conflict of interest in this manuscript.

Ethical standards

This article does not contain any experimental studies involving human or animal participants performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 308 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bento, A., Ferreira, L., Yánez Benitez, C. et al. Worldwide snapshot of trauma team structure and training: an international survey. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 49, 1771–1781 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02166-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02166-9

Keywords

Navigation