Skip to main content
Log in

Die intramedulläre Nagelung der diaphysären Klavikulafraktur in minimal-invasiver Repositionstechnik

Intramedullary nailing in diaphyseal clavicle fractures using minimally invasive percutaneous reduction

  • Tipps und Tricks
  • Published:
Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Operationsziel

Die Versorgung diaphysärer Klavikulaschaftfrakturen durch minimal-invasive Stabilisierung mittels elastisch stabiler intramedullärer Nagelung (ESIN) ermöglicht die Frakturschienung bei Weichteilschonung und geringer kosmetischer Beeinträchtigung.

Indikationen

Bei erfolgloser, geschlossener Reposition stellt das Repositionsmanöver mit Hilfe von zwei perkutan platzierten Repositionszangen ein alternatives Operationsverfahren zur offenen Versorgung/Einstellung dar.

Kontraindikationen

Offene, mehrfragmentäre oder nicht dislozierte Frakturen, Schrägfrakturen wegen postoperativer Dislokations- und Verkürzungsgefahr, drohende Durchspießung, neurovaskuläre Begleitverletzungen, Pseudarthrosen.

Operationstechnik

Der Patient wird in Beach-chair-Position gelagert. Nach Hautschnitt am medialen Ende der Klavikula wird der Markraum eröffnet. Vier Stichinzisionen, jeweils am lateralen und medialen Frakturende kranial und kaudal der Klavikula ermöglichen das perkutane Anbringen zweier Repositionszangen, um so die Reposition zu realisieren und den elastischen Titannagel in das laterale Fragment einzubringen. Das Frakturhämatom wird somit weitestgehend nicht kompromittiert.

Weiterbehandlung

Die Nachbehandlung ist frühfunktionell, Abduktion und Anteversion bis max. 90° für 6 Wochen.

Ergebnisse

Bei kosmetisch geringer Beeinträchtigung lässt sich eine regelhafte knöcherne Konsolidierung erreichen.

Abstract

Objective

Closed reduction and intramedullary nailing is common in diaphyseal clavicle fractures. The aim of this report is to demonstrate a surgical method with minimally invasive percutaneous reduction in cases where closed reduction fails. The procedure is associated with good cosmetic results.

Indications

Percutaneous reduction using two reduction forceps enables intramedullary nailing without an open procedure.

Contraindications

Open, multifragmented or non-dislocated fractures, oblique fractures due to postoperative dislocation or shortening risk, fracture having potential to become compound fractures, neurovascular complications, pseudoarthroses.

Surgical technique

The patient is in beach-chair position. After an incision, the nail is entered from medial, two reduction forceps are mounted percutaneously at the lateral and medial fragment. After reduction the nail is pushed forward into the lateral fragment. Thereby, the fracture hematoma is not disturbed for the most part.

Postoperative management

Early functional rehabilitation with maximal abduction and anteversion of 90° for 6 weeks.

Results

Anatomic reduction can be achieved with mild cosmetic impairment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2a–c
Abb. 3a–c
Abb. 4
Abb. 5a,b
Abb. 6
Abb. 7a,b

Literatur

  1. Pecci M, Kreher JB (2008) Clavicle fractures. Am Fam Physician 77(1):65–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F (2002) Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11(5):452–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Allman FL (1967) Fractures and ligamentous injuries of the clavicle and its articulation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 49(4):774–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Robinson CM (1998) Fractures of the clavicle in the adult. Epidemiology and classification. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(3):476–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Paladini P, Pellegrini A, Merolla G, Campi F, Porcellini G (2012) Treatment of clavicle fractures. Transl Med UniSa 2:47–58

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Jubel A, Andermahr J, Faymonville C, Binnebösel M, Prokop A, Rehm KE (2002) Reconstruction of shoulder-girdle symmetry after midclavicular fractures. Stable, elastic intramedullary pinning versus rucksack bandage. Chirurg 73(10):978–981

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Walz M, Kolbow B, Auerbach F (2006) Elastic, stable intramedullary nailing in midclavicular fractures – a change in treatment strategies? Unfallchirurg 109(3):200–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nowak J, Holgersson M, Larsson S (2004) Can we predict long-term sequelae after fractures of the clavicle based on initial findings? A prospective study with nine to ten years of follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13(5):479–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kraus TM, Martetschläger F, Schrödl C, Siebenlist S, Ganslmeier A, Kirchhoff C et al (2013) Elastic stable intramedullary nailing of clavicular midshaft fractures: comparison of open vs closed fracture reduction. Unfallchirurg 116(2):102–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jubel A, Andermahr J, Schiffer G, Rehm KE (2002) Technique of intramedullary osteosynthesis of the clavicle with elastic titanium nails. Unfallchirurg 105(6):511–516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ligier JN, Metaizeau JP, Prévot J (1983) Closed flexible medullary nailing in pediatric traumatology. Chir Pediatr 24(6):383–385

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Herring AA, Stone MB, Frenkel O, Chipman A, Nagdev AD (2012) The ultrasound-guided superficial cervical plexus block for anesthesia and analgesia in emergency care settings. Am J Emerg Med 30(7):1263–1267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Braunstein V, Kirchhoff C, Buhmann S, Mutschler W, Biberthaler P (2007) Bilateral clavicular fractures occurring at different times. Conservative vs operative therapy using intramedullary nailing – a case report. Orthopäde 36(8):757–760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM, Wakefield AE (2004) Estimating the risk of nonunion following nonoperative treatment of a clavicular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(7):1359–1365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Leroux T, Wasserstein D, Henry P, Khoshbin A, Dwyer T, Ogilvie-Harris D et al (2014) Rate of and risk factors for reoperations after open reduction and internal fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(13):1119–1125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ban I, Troelsen A (2016) Risk profile of patients developing nonunion of the clavicle and outcome of treatment-analysis of fifty five nonunions in seven hundred and twenty nine consecutive fractures. Int Orthop 40(3):587–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ashman BD, Slobogean GP, Stone TB, Viskontas DG, Moola FO, Perey BH et al (2014) Reoperation following open reduction and plate fixation of displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures. Injury 45(10):1549–1553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kettler M, Schieker M, Braunstein V, König M, Mutschler W (2007) Flexible intramedullary nailing for stabilization of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: technique and results in 87 patients. Acta Orthop 78(3):424–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith SD, Wijdicks CA, Jansson KS, Boykin RE, Martetschlaeger F, de Meijer P‑P et al (2014) Stability of mid-shaft clavicle fractures after plate fixation versus intramedullary repair and after hardware removal. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(2):448–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Altamimi SA, McKee MD, Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society (2008) Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 2 Pt 1):1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Müller MC, Burger C, Florczyk A, Striepens N, Rangger C (2007) Elastic titanium nails in minimally invasive osteosynthesis for mid-clavicular fractures. Chirurg 78(4):349–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kolar P, Gaber T, Perka C, Duda GN, Buttgereit F (2011) Human early fracture hematoma is characterized by inflammation and hypoxia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(11):3118–3126

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Müller.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

M. Müller, T. Freude, U. Stöckle und T.M. Kraus geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

Redaktion

U. Bosch, Hannover

Zeichner

C. Hengerer-Henkel, Mannheim

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Müller, M., Freude, T., Stöckle, U. et al. Die intramedulläre Nagelung der diaphysären Klavikulafraktur in minimal-invasiver Repositionstechnik. Oper Orthop Traumatol 29, 97–102 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-016-0479-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-016-0479-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation