Skip to main content
Log in

Parasite scouting and host defence behaviours are influenced by colony size in the slave-making ant Protomognathus americanus

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the slave-making ant Protomognathus americanus, scout workers leave their colony, discover host colonies, and initiate slave raids. Captured host pupae subsequently emerge in the slavemaker colony and replenish the slave workforce. The course of these antagonistic encounters can be influenced by the species, aggressivity, or size of the host colony. We asked how the demography of parasite and host colonies influences the initial raiding phase by observing the scouting behaviour of P. americanus slavemakers during 48 raiding attempts. Experiments were performed under controlled laboratory conditions in a Y-shaped experimental arena. The number of active scouts increased with increasing slavemaker worker numbers, but was unaffected by the slave to slavemaker ratio, showing that slavemaker worker numbers are a good indicator for the scouting workforce. Colonies with fewer slaves discovered host colonies faster (colonies with 15 or less slaves: median 9:53 min, colonies with 42 or more slaves: median 18:55 min), suggesting that small slave workforces lead to intensified scouting behaviour. The more scouts were active, the faster a host colony was discovered, but the time between discovery and trial completion was unaffected by slavemaker colony demography. Host colonies were successfully attacked in 79.2 % of the trials, and they fought off an intruding scout only once. Yet host aggression towards slavemaker scouts increased with host colony size, and higher aggression rates delayed a subsequent attack. Our study demonstrates that colony size influences the behaviour and the course of crucial interspecific interactions of a social parasite and its host.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams P.A. 2000. The evolution of predator-prey interactions: theory and evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 79-105

    Google Scholar 

  • Achenbach A. and Foitzik S. 2009. First evidence for slave rebellion: enslaved ant workers systematically kill the brood of their social parasite Protomognathus americanus. Evolution 63: 1068-1075

    Google Scholar 

  • Alloway T.M. 1979. Raiding behaviour of two species of slave-making ants, Harpagoxenus americanus (Emery) and Leptothorax duloticus Wesson (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Anim. Behav. 27: 202-210

  • Alloway T.M., Buschinger A., Talbot M., Stuart R. and Thomas C. 1982. Polygyny and polydomy in three North American species of the ant genus Leptothorax Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 89: 249-274

    Google Scholar 

  • Alloway T.M. and Del Rio Pesado M.G. 1983. Behavior of the slave-making ant, Harpagoxenus americanus (Emery), and its host species under “seminatural” laboratory conditions (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 90: 425-436

  • Anderson M.J., Gorley R.N. and Clarke K.R. 2008. PERMANOVA + for PRIMER: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UK.

  • Beckers R., Goss S., Deneubourg J.L. and Pasteels J.M. 1989. Colony size, communication and ant foraging strategy. Psyche 96: 239-256

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt M. and Foitzik S. 2004. Community context and specialization influence coevolution between a slavemaking ant and its hosts. Ecology 85: 2997-3009

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger A. 2009. Social parasitism among ants: a review (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 12: 219-235

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger A., Ehrhardt W. and Winter U. 1980. The organization of slave raids in dulotic ants - a comparative study (Hymenoptera; Formicidae). Z. Tierpsychol. 53: 245-264

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger A. and Winter U. 1977. Rekrutierung von Nestgenossen mittels Tandemlaufen bei Sklavenraubzügen der dulotischen Ameise Harpagoxenus sublaevis (Nyl.). Insect. Soc. 24: 183-190

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush A.O., Fernández J.C., Esch G.W. and Seed R.J. 2001. Parasitism: The Diversity and Ecology of Animal Parasites. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Combes C. 2005. The Art of Being a Parasite. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  • Creighton W.S. 1927. The slave-raids of Harpagoxenus americanus. Psyche 34: 11-29

    Google Scholar 

  • Creighton W.S. 1929. Further notes on the habits of Harpagoxenus americanus. Psyche 36: 48-50

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ettorre P., Brunner E., Wenseleers T. and Heinze J. 2004. Knowing your enemies: seasonal dynamics of host-social parasite recognition. Naturwissenschaften 91: 594-597

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Blass B., Heinze J. and Foitzik S. 2006. Microsatellite analysis reveals strong but differential impact of a social parasite on its two host species. Mol. Ecol. 15: 863-872

    Google Scholar 

  • Foitzik S., Achenbach A. and Brandt M. 2009. Locally adapted social parasite affects density, social structure, and life history of its ant hosts. Ecology 90: 1195-1206

    Google Scholar 

  • Foitzik S., DeHeer C.J., Hunjan D.N. and Herbers J.M. 2001. Coevolution in host-parasite systems: behavioural strategies of slave-making ants and their hosts. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 1139-1146

    Google Scholar 

  • Foitzik S. and Herbers J.M. 2001a. Colony structure of a slavemaking ant. I. Intracolony relatedness, worker reproduction, and polydomy. Evolution 55: 307-315

  • Foitzik S. and Herbers J.M. 2001b. Colony structure of a slavemaking ant. II. Frequency of slave raids and impact on the host population. Evolution 55: 316-323

  • Franks N.R. and Richardson T. 2006. Teaching in tandem-running ants. Nature 439: 153

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodloe L.P. and Topoff H. 1987. Pupa acceptance by slaves of the social-parasitic ant Polyergus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 94: 293-302

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T. and Ryan P.D. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4: 9 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbers J.M. and Foitzik S. 2002. The ecology of slavemaking ants and their hosts in north temperate forests. Ecology 83: 148-163

    Google Scholar 

  • Herre E.A., Knowlton N., Mueller U.G. and Rehner S.A. 1999. The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 49-53

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B. 1985. Liquid food transmission and antennation signals in ponerine ants. Isr. J. Entomol. 19: 89-99

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B. and Wilson E.O. 1990. The Ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

  • Krams I., Bērziņš A. and Krama T. 2009. Group effect in nest defence behaviour of breeding pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim. Behav. 77: 513-517

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Moli F. and Mori A. 1987. Why a slave ant species accepts and cares for cocoons of its slave-maker. Insect. Soc. 34: 136-141

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir A. and Jaisson P. 1982. Evolution et rôle des communications antennaires chez les insectes sociaux. In: Social Insects in the Tropics (Jaisson P., Ed), vol. 1, Presses de l’Université Paris XIII, Paris. pp 157-180

  • Lima S.L. 1998. Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator-prey interactions. Bioscience 48: 25-34

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima S.L. and Dill L.M. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68: 619-640

    Google Scholar 

  • Möglich M. 1978. Social organization of nest emigration in Leptothorax (Hym., Form.). Insect. Soc. 25: 205-225

  • Moore J. 2002. Parasites and the Behavior of Animals. Oxford University Press, New York

  • Peckarsky B.L., Abrams P.A., Bolnick D.I., Dill L.M., Grabowski J.H., Luttbeg B., Orrock J.L., Peacor S.D., Preisser E.L., Schmitz O.J. and Trussell G.C. 2008. Revisiting the classics: considering nonconsumptive effects in textbook examples of predator-prey interactions. Ecology 89: 2416-2425

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl S. and Foitzik S. 2011. Slave-making ants prefer larger, better defended host colonies. Anim. Behav. 81: 61-68

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl S., Witte V. and Foitzik S. 2011. Division of labor and slave raid initiation in slave-making ants. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65: 2029-2036

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharf I., Pamminger T. and Foitzik S. 2011. Differential response of ant colonies to intruders: attack strategies correlate with potential threat. Ethology 117: 731-739

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener T.W. 1983. Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am. Nat. 122: 240-285

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart R.J. and Alloway T.M. 1983. The slave-making ant, Harpagoxenus canadensis M.R. Smith, and its host-species, Leptothorax muscorum (Nylander): slave raiding and territoriality. Behaviour 85: 58-90

  • Sturtevant A.H. 1927. The social parasitism of the ant Harpagoxenus americanus. Psyche 34: 1-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Svennungsen T.O. and Holen Ø.H. 2010. Avian brood parasitism: information use and variation in egg-rejection behavior. Evolution 64: 1459-1469

    Google Scholar 

  • Visicchio R., Castracani C., Mori A., Grasso D.A. and Le Moli F. 2003. How raiders of the slave-making ant Polyergus rufescens (Hymenoptera Formicidae) evaluate a target host nest. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 15: 369-378

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesson L.G., Jr. 1939. Contributions to the natural history of Harpagoxenus americanus Emery (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 65: 97-122

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson E.O. 1958. A chemical releaser of alarm and digging behavior in the ant Pogonomyrmex badius (Latreille). Psyche 65: 41-51

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Sofia Lizon à l’Allemand, Christoph von Beeren and two other field assistants for their help during ant collection and Andrea Hintermair for her assistance during the raiding experiments. Special thanks go to Volker Witte who helped us with the data analysis. This work was supported by the Edmund Niles Huyck Preserve, Rensselaerville, New York, and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Fo 298/8).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Pohl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pohl, S., Foitzik, S. Parasite scouting and host defence behaviours are influenced by colony size in the slave-making ant Protomognathus americanus . Insect. Soc. 60, 293–301 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-013-0293-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-013-0293-7

Keywords

Navigation