Skip to main content
Log in

Polycubes with Small Perimeter Defect

  • Published:
Annals of Combinatorics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we consider enumeration of d-dimensional polycubes, whose perimeter (defined as the number of empty cells neighboring the polycube) has a fixed deviation from the maximum possible value. We provide a general framework for deriving such formulae, as well as several explicit formulae. In particular, we prove that for any fixed dimension d, the generating function that enumerates polycubes with a fixed defect (with respect to their volume) is rational. Moreover, its denominator is a product of cyclotomic polynomials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It is easy to observe [11] that polycubes of size n can span at most \(n{-}1\) dimensions, hence, \(\text {DX}(n,d) = 0\) for any \(d \ge n\). Therefore, Lunnon’s formula can be rewritten as \(A_d(n) = \sum _{i=0}^{\min (d,n{-}1)} \left( {\begin{array}{c}d\\ i\end{array}}\right) \text {DX}(n,i)\).

  2. The sporadic values are 0 for \(1 \le n \le 3\); 9 for \(n = 4\); and 28 for \(n = 5\). In the sequel, we will not provide sporadic values due to lack of interest.

  3. A quasi-polynomial is a generalization of a polynomial, in which coefficients are periodic functions with an integral period.

  4. The nth cyclotomic polynomial \(\Phi _n(x)\) is the (unique) irreducible polynomial with integer coefficients that divides \(x^n-1\), and does not divide \(x^k-1\) for any \(k<n\). The first cyclotomic polynomials are \(\Phi _1(x)=x-1\), \(\Phi _2(x)=x+1\), \(\Phi _3(x)=x^2+x+1\).

  5. That is, in a polycube of size at least 2, any cell Z is an L-cell unless it has degree 1, or its degree is 2 and both its neighbors are attached to opposite faces of Z.

  6. To see a simpler example for this phenomenon, one can consider the case shown in Fig. 3(b) for \(k=2\), split it into three subcases depending on whether the left vertical bar is shorter, longer, or equal in length to the right one, and calculate generating functions for each of them. We leave the details to the reader.

References

  1. The online encyclopedia of integer sequences (OEIS). http://oeis.org.

  2. The open problems project. http://cs.smith.edu/~jorourke/TOPP/.

  3. G. Aleksandrowicz and G. Barequet. Counting \(d\)-dimensional polycubes and nonrectangular planar polyominoes. Int. J. of Computational Geometry & Applications, 19(3):215–229, 2009.

  4. A. Asinowski, G. Barequet, R. Barequet, and G. Rote. Proper \(n\)-cell polycubes in \(n{-}3\) dimensions. J. of Integer Sequences, 15(2):3, 2012.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Asinowski, G. Barequet, and Y. Zheng. Enumerating polyominoes with fixed perimeter defect. Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics, 61:61–67, 2017.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Asinowski, G. Barequet, and Y. Zheng. Polycubes with small perimeter defect. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 93–100. SIAM, 2018.

  7. G. Barequet and B. Magal. Automatic generation of formulae for polyominoes with a fixed perimeter defect. Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications, 2022. Accepted for publication.

  8. G. Barequet, G. Rote, and M. Shalah. \(\lambda > 4\): An improved lower bound on the growth constant of polyominoes. Comm. of the ACM, 59(7):88–95, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Barequet and M. Shalah. Counting \(n\)-cell polycubes proper in \(n{-}k\) dimensions. European J. of Combinatorics, 63:146–163, 2017.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Barequet and M. Shalah. Improved upper bounds on the growth constants of polyominoes and polycubes. In Latin American Symposium on Theoretical Informatics, pages 532–545. Springer, 2021. Full version: Algorithmica, accepted for publication.

  11. R. Barequet, G. Barequet, and G. Rote. Formulae and growth rates of high-dimensional polycubes. Combinatorica, 30(3):257–275, 2010.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Bousquet-Mélou and A. Rechnitzer. The site-perimeter of bargraphs. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 31(1):86–112, 2003.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. S.R. Broadbent and J.M. Hammersley. Percolation processes: I. Crystals and mazes. In Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, volume 53, pages 629–641. Cambridge University Press, 1957.

  14. A.R. Conway and A.J. Guttmann. On two-dimensional percolation. J. of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 28(4):891, 1995.

  15. M. Eden. A two-dimensional growth process. Dynamics of fractal surfaces, 4:223–239, 1961.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. D.S. Gaunt. The critical dimension for lattice animals. J. of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 13(4):L97, 1980.

  17. D.S. Gaunt, M.F. Sykes, and H. Ruskin. Percolation processes in d-dimensions. J. of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 9(11):1899, 1976.

  18. S.W. Golomb. Polyominoes: Puzzles, patterns, problems, and packings. Princeton University Press, 1996.

  19. F. Harary. Unsolved problems in the enumeration of graphs. Publications of the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 5:1–20, 1960.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. I. Jensen. Enumerations of lattice animals and trees. J. of Statistical Physics, 102(3–4):865–881, 2001.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. I. Jensen. Counting polyominoes: A parallel implementation for cluster computing. In International Conference on Computational Science, Melbourne, Australia and St. Petersburg, Russia, pages 203–212. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2659, Springer, 2003.

  22. D.A. Klarner. Cell growth problems. Canadian J. of Mathematics, 19(851–863):23, 1967.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. W.F. Lunnon. Counting multidimensional polyominoes. The Computer Journal, 18(4):366–367, 1975.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Luther and S. Mertens. Counting lattice animals in high dimensions. J. of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2011(09):546–565, 2011.

  25. S. Luther and S. Mertens. The perimeter of proper polycubes. J. of Integer Sequences, 20(2):22, 2017.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. N. Madras. A pattern theorem for lattice clusters. Annals of Combinatorics, 3(2-4):357–384, 1999.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. N. Madras, C.E. Soteros, S.G. Whittington, J.L. Martin, M.F. Sykes, S. Flesia, and D.S. Gaunt. The free energy of a collapsing branched polymer. J. of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 23(22):5327, 1990.

  28. J.L. Martin. The impact of large-scale computing on lattice statistics. J. of Statistical Physics, 58(3-4):749–774, 1990.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. A. Rechnitzer. The anisotropic generating function of self-avoiding polygons is not D-finite. In Polygons, polyominoes and polycubes, volume 775 of Lecture Notes in Phys., pages 93–115. Springer, Dordrecht, 2009.

  30. D.H. Redelmeier. Counting polyominoes: Yet another attack. Discrete Mathematics, 36(2):191–203, 1981.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. H.N.V. Temperley. Combinatorial problems suggested by the statistical mechanics of domains and of rubber-like molecules. Physical Review, 103(1):1, 1956.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gill Barequet.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest. Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Additional information

Communicated by Frédérique Bassino.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Research by the first author has been supported by FWF Grants SFB F50-03 and P28466-N35. Research by the second and third authors has been supported in part by Grant 575/15 from the Israel Science Foundation (ISF) and by Grant 2017684 from the Binational Science Foundation (BSF). Preliminary versions of this paper appeared in Ref. [5] (2D only) and Ref. [6]

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asinowski, A., Barequet, G. & Zheng, Y. Polycubes with Small Perimeter Defect. Ann. Comb. 26, 997–1020 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00026-022-00601-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00026-022-00601-7

Keywords

Navigation